On Monday, July 25, 2016 5:22:08 PM CEST Sandro Knauß wrote: > Hey, > > no the sender client is wrong. > multipart/alternative is defined as the mail client should select ONLY one > part of the alternatives and ignore every other part, if one is selected. > See https://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc1341/7_2_Multipart.html > > The corect type would be multipart/mixed
Yes, that makes sense. > But unfortunatelly a mail client needs to work with broken senders, there > are already a lot of places with comments like "broken apple client" :D The > hard one here is to find a solution not to break the good clients, that > using multipart/alternative correctly. > > Can you create a upsteam bug for it and append the mail (and send me the > bugnumber)? Than I can have a deeper look and find a solution. I'm currently > reworking the messageviewer, so I'm deeply into the code... It would be much more time efficient to send a prepared mail to you. You decide to open a bug at KDE or just to fix it. I prepared a relatively small email that behaves like the original one. I send it to you via sendmail. Regards, Tim
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
