I am using Kmail 1.8.2 within Kontact 1.1.2, KDE 3.4.2, on a Debian box
I have finished writing an email in HTML with Kmail, and had it saved in drafts
folder.
Then, when open it from drafts folder again, all format is lost, now it is
simply an ordinary plain-text one, and I have to re-edit it!
orcishhan wrote:
> I am using Kmail 1.8.2 within Kontact 1.1.2, KDE 3.4.2, on a Debian box
http://groups.google.com/group/macromedia.dreamweaver/browse_thread\
/thread/fde6351e2cf91f41/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thread_Hijacking
Best,
Matěj
--
Matej Cepl, http://www.ceplovi.cz/matej
I am using Kmail 1.8.2 within Kontact 1.1.2, KDE 3.4.2, on a Debian box
I have finished writing an email in HTML with Kmail, and had it saved in drafts
folder.
Then, when open it from drafts folder again, all format is lost, now it is
simply an ordinary plain-text one, and I have to re-edit it!
Randy Kramer wrote:
> On Tuesday 27 September 2005 01:44 pm, Pete Jewell wrote:
>
>>However, ReiserFS is *much* more efficient when you have thousands of
>>files in one directory, because it uses a hashing algorithm to determine
>>where the required file is (or starts) in the filesystem. This is
* David Goodenough [Tue, 27 Sep 2005 10:28:56 +0100]:
> This may well be the case, but it still does not answer the question as to
> where the official packages are. Maybe the time has now come to say
> that the original request not to put in bugs against packages which have
> not been updated is
On Tuesday 27 September 2005 01:44 pm, Pete Jewell wrote:
> However, ReiserFS is *much* more efficient when you have thousands of
> files in one directory, because it uses a hashing algorithm to determine
> where the required file is (or starts) in the filesystem. This is
> something I know about
I think it's time to drink a bit from the hose.. :)
For info on hotplug:
http://linux-hotplug.sourceforge.net/
For info on udev:
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/kernel/hotplug/udev-FAQ
(Udev handles /dev. Nothing more, nothing less.)
A thread about udev on debian planet:
http://www.deb
Derek Broughton wrote:
> Randy Kramer wrote:
>
>
>>On Tuesday 27 September 2005 09:27 am, Derek Broughton wrote:
>>
>>>Why do you think Maildir would perform worse for folders with thousands
>>>of
>>>emails? Everything I've read suggests it will perform better - and more
>>>reliably.
>>
>>First
André Wöbbeking wrote:
> On Tuesday 27 September 2005 15:27, Derek Broughton wrote:
>> Randy Kramer wrote:
>> > I suppose maildir will be OK (and maybe even better) for my inbox,
>> > which I generally keep "trimmed" (not too many emails).
>> >
>> > I don't think I want to do that for my mail fold
Randy Kramer wrote:
> On Tuesday 27 September 2005 09:27 am, Derek Broughton wrote:
>>
>> Why do you think Maildir would perform worse for folders with thousands
>> of
>> emails? Everything I've read suggests it will perform better - and more
>> reliably.
>
> First a quick (but dumb, I should lo
Theo Schmidt wrote:
> Derek Broughton schrieb:
>> Bellegarde Cedric wrote:
>>> Roman Kreisel wrote:
> ...
And no, afaik, hotplug is _not_ obsolete.
> ...
>>>hotplug is obsolete, udev is now the good way to do (and not hal):
>
> Oh great, even the experts disagree...
Oooh, I hope he's not ta
Am Dienstag, 27. September 2005 16:48 schrieb Randy Kramer:
> First a quick (but dumb, I should look it up) question. Does Linux do the
> thing that Dos/Windows does (used to do?) of each file requiring a minimum
> space (one cluster?), or does it vary by filesystem?
That never had anything to do
On Monday 26 September 2005 19:11, Bellegarde Cedric wrote:
> On Monday 26 September 2005 10:30, Roman Kreisel wrote:
> > And no, afaik, hotplug is _not_ obsolete.
>
> hotplug is obsolete, udev is now the good way to do(and not hal):
> >Thanks to the replacement of hotplug with udev functions,
> >a
On Tuesday 27 September 2005 09:27 am, Derek Broughton wrote:
> Randy Kramer wrote:
> > I suppose maildir will be OK (and maybe even better) for my inbox, which
> > I generally keep "trimmed" (not too many emails).
> >
> > I don't think I want to do that for my mail folders which often have a
> > l
On Tuesday 27 September 2005 15:27, Derek Broughton wrote:
> Randy Kramer wrote:
> > I suppose maildir will be OK (and maybe even better) for my inbox,
> > which I generally keep "trimmed" (not too many emails).
> >
> > I don't think I want to do that for my mail folders which often
> > have a lot
Randy Kramer wrote:
> I suppose maildir will be OK (and maybe even better) for my inbox, which I
> generally keep "trimmed" (not too many emails).
>
> I don't think I want to do that for my mail folders which often have a lot
> (thousands) of archived emails (usually short).
>
> Is it the genera
Derek Broughton schrieb:
Bellegarde Cedric wrote:
Roman Kreisel wrote:
...
And no, afaik, hotplug is _not_ obsolete.
...
hotplug is obsolete, udev is now the good way to do (and not hal):
Oh great, even the experts disagree... I gleaned my clip on "obsolete
hotplug" from an article about
Bellegarde Cedric wrote:
> On Monday 26 September 2005 10:30, Roman Kreisel wrote:
>> And no, afaik, hotplug is _not_ obsolete.
>
> hotplug is obsolete, udev is now the good way to do(and not hal):
>
>>Thanks to the replacement of hotplug with udev functions,
>>all machines now boot faster.
>
>
On Tuesday 27 September 2005 00:51, Matej Cepl wrote:
> Alan Chandler wrote:
> > Anybody any idea what is holding up the koffice transision. I have my
> > updated KDE for a few weeks now, but I am still without kword (and
> > others). Occassional messages to this list all have replies that express
On Monday 26 September 2005 19:11, Bellegarde Cedric wrote:
> On Monday 26 September 2005 10:30, Roman Kreisel wrote:
> > And no, afaik, hotplug is _not_ obsolete.
>
> hotplug is obsolete, udev is now the good way to do(and not hal):
http://packages.debian.org/unstable/admin/udev :
" It resp
20 matches
Mail list logo
