Randy Kramer wrote: > I suppose maildir will be OK (and maybe even better) for my inbox, which I > generally keep "trimmed" (not too many emails). > > I don't think I want to do that for my mail folders which often have a lot > (thousands) of archived emails (usually short). > > Is it the general consensus that mbox is more subject to corruption than > maildir?
By definition. Why do you think Maildir would perform worse for folders with thousands of emails? Everything I've read suggests it will perform better - and more reliably. -- derek -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
