on script which saves the information in a sqlite
> database and that same script can search for a class or can list the
> classes in a package. Also, has an option to update the database. Tony
> (added in Cc) had been testing it. But I have not made any attempt to
> package it yet, as
> What is the preferred solution for this? Can I rename the plugin to:
> org.eclipse.wst.common.emfworkbench ? or just ignore the lintian warning?
In my opinion, you should prefer consistent naming and ignore (or
override) the lintian warning.
Cheers,
tony
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
e should be
building it from source.
If you are interested, here is a link to the DFSG and an excellent FAQ
about [3,4].
Cheers,
tony
[1] https://github.com/oracle/graal
[2] https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-archive#s-non-free
[3] https://www.debian.org/social_contract.html#guidelines
Hi Dongjin,
On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 07:43:20PM +0900, Dongjin Lee wrote:
> Hi Tony,
>
> > In this case, given that Graal is GPLv2 with the CPE, it feels like we
> should be building it from source.
>
> Thanks for the comprehensive explanation. It was the very answer I ne
f the sources:
➜ cdk-2.3.134.g1bb9a64587 find . -name Isomorphism.java
./legacy/src/main/java/org/openscience/cdk/smsd/Isomorphism.java
But the legacy pom is ignored:
https://salsa.debian.org/java-team/cdk/-/blob/master/debian/libcdk-java.poms#L91
I'll look into the discrepancy with libjgrapht0.6-java, which doesn't
include maven metadata.
Cheers,
tony
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi Andrius,
On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 08:51:49AM +0300, mer...@debian.org wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 2020-07-27 08:38, tony mancill wrote:
> >> It actually seems that org/openscience/cdk/smsd/Isomorphism is not
> >> part of the currently packaged CDK. Any idea how t
On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 11:56:24AM +0300, mer...@debian.org wrote:
> Hi Tony,
>
> On 2020-07-27 16:50, tony mancill wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 08:51:49AM +0300, mer...@debian.org wrote:
> >> What is more, the subtree tool/smsd/ contains only pom.xml, what mig
anks and I hope everyone is having a great week!
Same to you!
Cheers,
tony
eed to package version 7.x. Debian can start with
8.x from the sources here: https://github.com/openjdk/jmc
Cheers,
tony
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
y suggested changes then I can go
> ahead and team-upload them. All the changes are only in the
> MANIFEST.MF and nothing in the code.
Hi Sudip,
Sounds reasonable to me.
Cheers,
tony
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, Sep 20, 2020 at 01:01:43AM +0100, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 19, 2020 at 11:34 PM tony mancill wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 12:40:44PM +0100, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> > > Hi All,
> > >
> > > While working on #943552 I faced few
On Sat, Sep 26, 2020 at 03:40:39PM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote:
> In short: 3.6.2 will not be released again, 8.x could make it into
> Debian 11 but there is a big question mark at the moment, more help is
> appreciated.
Hi Markus,
Can you post a list of what others can help with?
Che
tream.
I like the idea of focusing on a toolchain to make it easier to build
these packages. We should be able to offer them via contrib [1].
Cheers,
tony
[1]
https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-archive.html#the-contrib-archive-area
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
411
Uid: pgtdeb...@free.fr
Allowed: libdsiutils-java
Cheers,
tony
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
pdate, would you mind if I prepare an upload of
11.0.9.1 for Debian stable?
Thank you,
tony
[1] https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/openjdk-11
[2] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8250861
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 09:26:13AM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 03:05:26PM -0800, tony mancill wrote:
> > Hello Matthias, Tiago, and other members of the OpenJDK team,
> >
> > Thank you for the recent uploads of 11.0.9.1 [1]. Given that it
>
n do it to take the load off people.
+1, both for getting this into the Debian and I am also offering to help (if
that helps).
Thank you for noticing this Thorsten.
Cheers,
tony
On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 05:34:25PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Thu, 2020-12-03 at 11:28 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > [adding d-java to Cc for greater visibility]
> >
> > On Mon, 2020-11-30 at 09:21 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2020-11-2
;m using the
schroot on the porterbox.
In any event, my inclination is to close the unaligned access bug and
open a new bug for the test failure on this architecture. I can't
reproduce it on amd64.
Cheers,
tony
if it didn't work.
Cheers,
tony
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
e added to the Salsa group? My username is pollo.
Hi Louis-Philippe Véronneau,
Welcome to the Java Team!
Cheers,
tony
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
> dcut dm --uid "Pierre Gruet" --allow libmiglayout-java
Done.
> With a bit of advance, best wishes for 2021!
Likewise!
Cheers,
tony
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
lacement. (I'm
assuming that eclipse-collections is a drop-in replacement, or nearly so
- maybe just a Java package name change?)
> Best wishes for the new year
Same to you!
Cheers,
tony
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 07:10:25PM +0100, Vincent Prat wrote:
> Hi Tony,
>
> >> Should we package Eclipse Collections as a separate project (in which
> >> case I will submit an ITP bug), or update and rename the existing package?
> >> For your information,
Hi Pierre,
I reviewed the diff, built the package, and build the r-deps
(libspring-java) with ratt.
Thank you for the bug fix. DM rights granted.
Cheers,
tony
On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 05:15:55PM +0100, Pierre Gruet wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have updated the package eclipselink, which FTB
s well.)
Thank you for packaging this.
Cheers,
tony
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
to enable salsa-ci for every package I'd work on,
> please consider to bump my access level to maintainer
I have added you to the team as a Maintainer. Thank you for
contributing!
Be aware that there is not consensus among members of the Java Team
regarding use of salsa-ci, so please discuss on-list before enabling for
large numbers of team-maintained packages.
Cheers,
tony
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 10:47:36AM -0400, Olek Wojnar wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 27, 2021, 04:09 Peymaneh Nejad wrote:
> > Is it intended or wished for that additional runtimes other than Java are
> > packaged in seperate source packages, or would it be better to add another
> > binary package (that'd b
pens if the
version of the ANTLR parser for language X is subtly incompatible with
language Y, and a user runs a system on Debian that requires both
bindings?)
tony
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
was originally me who asked Peymaneh to contact
> this list, and I was sponsoring the same.
> I was initially of the same opinion that it should be unified into a
> single source package, but ebourg's points against doing that are pretty
> strong too.
> 2) Do "$something-else" for all these packages to stay in sync - again,
> probably bumping versions only when needed.
> With this approach, I do not see a problem in introducing a Go runtime
> source package there
100% agreed. I don't mean to belabor the point. Thank you for the
discussion and for the links to the other language packages.
Cheers,
tony
ebian, I thought readers of this list might have
opinions about whether I should switch the Debian packaging from
building against lapack to openblas.
Thank you for your input!
tony
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, Dec 12, 2021 at 10:37:54AM +0100, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 10/12/2021 à 15:20, Felix Lechner a écrit :
>
> > Lintian cites your manual as supporting documentation for several
> > tags. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8] Such references help users when
> > grasping the conditions that provoke Linti
? Since it addresses a security concern, I
am intending to set the urgency=high. I have kicked off a ratt build
(133 reverse build dependencies) that is still underway, but everything
has been successful so far. If there are any build failures, I can
follow-up on them sooner.
Thank you,
tony
On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 10:22:04PM +0100, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> libjpf-java is affected by an RC which in turn affects its rdepds like
> osmosis.
>
> I've updated the package in git to modernize the packaging.
>
> tony, do you want to make any changes before upl
ction:
> Version 3
> • uscan invokes the custom script as "script --upstream-version version
> ../spkg_version.orig.tar.gz".
>
> Version 4
> • uscan invokes the custom script as "script --upstream-version version".
I have tested locally, updated debian/watch, and pushed this to the
Salsa repo.
My apologies for the confusion.
tony
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
n, if nothing else,
it is consistent with other languages in Debian. So my vote is to
accept the change.
That fact that so many packages are affected does mean there will be a
lot of uploads, but ideally we will upload at least once per release
cycle (anyway), so the timing of this patch and proposal is reasonable.
I am interested to hear other opinions from the Debian Java Team.
Cheers,
tony
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
at if you would like. (I recently
configured a local s390x QEMU environment for another project and so
have it ready to go.)
Regards,
tony
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi Paul,
On Sat, Aug 13, 2022 at 09:51:03PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, 3 Jul 2022 21:25:49 +0200 Paul Gevers wrote:
> > Your package failed to build from source on arm64 and armhf while it
> > built there successfully in the past.
>
> I just checked to see if there would be a c
Hi Phil,
On Sat, Aug 20, 2022 at 05:10:10PM +0100, Phil Morrell wrote:
> Feel free to chat with me in #debian-java on irc/matrix and if anyone
> has permissions to the Salsa java-team, please could you add me there.
Done.
Cheers,
tony
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
rs
> * URL : https://codeberg.org/tob/stegosuite
> * License : GPL3
> Programming Lang: Java
> Description : Steganography tool to hide information in image files
Hello Tobias,
I will sponsor this update. Thank you for your contribution to Debian!
Cheers,
Tony
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
t, but after a quick first glance at the source
tree, it appears that the packaging should be straight-forward. For
example, I didn't notice any build dependencies that we would have to
package first.
Filing either an RFP [1] or ITP [2] bug would be a good next step.
Cheers,
ton
bian Java team" or something else in the
> ITP bug?
That's great! (And I meant to mention that in my first response.) It
definitely sounds like a good package for team maintenance, and the Java
Team is the right one. Please let me know if I can help with reviews,
sponsoring, etc.
Th
ution to Debian!
Cheers,
tony
the standards version
- update the debhelper dependency
Cheers,
tony
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
on) will be able to configure
itself, even if perhaps not optimally, without setting either
"+UseParallelGC" or "+UseG1GC". Is that all we need to change?
We should be able to build and ship the package with conservative
(compatible) defaults and document tuning for better per
pload target unstable or experimental? (Unless you plan to
file an unblock request with the release team for bookworm, I think it
should experimental.)
If that's okay with you, I will update the changelog before sponsoring
the upload.
Cheers,
tony
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
ccessful:
sbuild --chroot=unstable --dist=unstable --arch-any --arch-all
And this build is also successful:
sbuild --chroot=unstable --dist=unstable --no-arch-any --arch-all
Let me know if you have any problems reproducing this locally. It might
be helpful to invoke the build with DH_VERBOSE=1.
Che
the fix should also include
updating debian/control to strictly depend on the version(s) specified
in the patched pom. Without some explicit declaration of dependencies,
it seems like this is going to break again, right?
Thanks,
tony
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
ava-team/jabref/-/blob/master/debian/rules#L13
And be declared as a dependency of the binary package:
https://salsa.debian.org/java-team/jabref/-/blob/master/debian/control#L55
Cheers,
tony
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
n up anyway. The dependency on gcj-jdk was dropped from javahelper
(src:javatools) for buster [0].
Thanks for catching this.
Cheers,
tony
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=892530
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
t cases, but will either update this bug or upload
in the 2-3 days.
Regards,
tony
at do you think?
Hi Felix,
In my opinion we should be remove the outdated freeplane package from
Debian.
Cheers,
tony
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
; built successfully.
Hi Chris,
If it saves you any time (it's a long build), I was able to build
zeroc-ice successfully on armel after adding Vladimir's suggestion to
debian/rules.
Cheers,
tony
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
k this is suitable for all builds.
Cheers,
tony
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
es for video conference at Debconf, we
could schedule a Java BoF to discuss your plans. Afternoon in GMT+9
will the morning in Europe and late evening in the evening in the US.
(Of course, we could do that before or after Debconf too.)
Cheers,
tony
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
new upstream versions are somewhat easier via mentors
anyway.)
Thank you,
tony
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
make it easier to
maintain the packages we do have.
- Less version drift from upstream (where possible).
Thank you for compiling the list, and happy new year!
tony
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 07:59:53PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
>https://salsa.debian.org/java-team/liblastfm-java/
>
> has visibility set to private. Could some owner please set it to
> public, please.
Done.
Cheers,
tony
packaging XMLUnit 2.x.
Cheers,
tony
[1] https://github.com/xmlunit/user-guide/wiki/Migrating-from-XMLUnit-1.x-to-2.x
On Thu, May 01, 2025 at 01:25:16PM +0200, Mechtilde wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Do you have any problems if I start directly with a version 2 of xmlunit.
>
> It will create som
On Sat, Jul 19, 2025 at 11:36:43AM +0200, Jérôme Charaoui wrote:
> I would also like to propose adding Debian's Java packages to the BTS
> bot [1] on IRC, to post BTS and archive notifications to
> #debian-java-changes as well.
>
> This is akin to what other teams are doing in Debian.
>
> I belie
ill
> likely be required by OpenJDK 26 and later.
Yes, it is certainly okay. Please let me know if you lack any of the
necessary permissions in the Salsa project.
Thank you,
tony
801 - 861 of 861 matches
Mail list logo
