On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 09:26:13AM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 03:05:26PM -0800, tony mancill wrote: > > Hello Matthias, Tiago, and other members of the OpenJDK team, > > > > Thank you for the recent uploads of 11.0.9.1 [1]. Given that it > > addresses JDK-8250861 [2] (which is serious, although I'm unsure as to > > whether it is DSA-worthy) and there are likely derivatives that would > > benefit from the update, would you mind if I prepare an upload of > > 11.0.9.1 for Debian stable? > > This doesn't seem like a security issue, but a generic bug affecting > 11.0.9? > > If this can't wait until the next CPU in January, fixing this > via the upcoming 10.7 point release is an option: > https://lists.debian.org/debian-live/2020/11/msg00000.html > https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/pkgs.en.html#special-case-uploads-to-the-stable-and-oldstable-distributions
I agree that it's a generic bug affecting 11.0.9 (albeit a serious one). I will prepare an upload for stable-proposed-updates that will replace yours from a few weeks ago [1]. Since we have stacked proposed updates, do you know whether the debdiff for the release.debian.org bug should be against 11.0.9+11-1~deb10u1 (current proposed update) or 11.0.8+10-1~deb10u1 (current version in stable)? I suppose I can attach them both. Thank you both for the responses, tony [1] https://tracker.debian.org/news/1188653/accepted-openjdk-11-110911-1deb10u1-source-amd64-all-into-proposed-updates-stable-new-proposed-updates/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
