On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 11:56:24AM +0300, mer...@debian.org wrote: > Hi Tony, > > On 2020-07-27 16:50, tony mancill wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 08:51:49AM +0300, mer...@debian.org wrote: > >> What is more, the subtree tool/smsd/ contains only pom.xml, what might > >> be the reason of codeless jar. It seems to me that cdk-smsd is legacy > >> now, and I would suggest asking the upstream for advice how to port code > >> depending on it. > > I still plan to take a look at what it would take to compile the > > legacy/pom.xml. > > Sure, please do. However, I would not count too much on this pom, as it > may get removed in the upcoming cdk releases.
Fair enough... In the long run, it is likely that porting r-cran-rcdk
is a better use of time. However, I got interested in it and here is
the status so far:
1) I updated jgrapht0.6 to install a pom file and uploaded a new
package to unstable.
2) I updated the cdk source package to build-dep on the javacc maven
plugin and re-enabled the legacy pom.
3) I used ratt to build packages that build-depend on cdk. The
new package addresses the issue with r-cran-rcdk, but cinfony fails:
2020/07/28 20:27:10 PASSED: r-cran-rcdklibs
2020/07/28 20:27:10 FAILED: cinfony (see buildlogs/cinfony_1.2-4)
However, the cinfony failure on my system is for:
unsat-dependency: python-indigo:amd64
And it also fails when built against cdk_2.3.134.g1bb9a64587-1, so I
don't think this is related to my change.
I created a merge request [1] so you can take a look. I'm happy to
prepare an upload if it looks okay to you.
Cheers,
tony
[1] https://salsa.debian.org/java-team/cdk/-/merge_requests/4
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
