Package: java-common
Severity: minor
Usertags: retirement-java
Hi,
I have retired from the Java Team[1] and kindly ask to be removed as
uploader of java-common. Thanks for having me. :)
~Niels
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-java/2014/11/msg00032.html
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian
ssion?
>
> Emmanuel Bourg
>
>
For reference, it could also be a change in tar (see #728025).
~Niels
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5270c543.1030...@thykier.net
be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
>
> Kind regards,
> Andy Ross
>
>
Uploaded, thanks for your contribution.
Thanks,
~Niels
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5277d489.1000...@thykier.net
about 14 days,
unless there are alternative solutions (that does not involve keeping
openjdk-6 around).
~Niels
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.
Package: java-common
Control: submitter -1 tom.jo...@bccx.com
On 2013-11-10 12:44, Tom Jones wrote:
> Dear Torsten, Niels, and Javier,
>
> Any chance you could update [1] for Debian 7 (wheezy)? Currently it
> only goes up to Debian 6 (squeeze). Also, if you are going to use
> c
On 2013-11-09 14:35, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> (With my Java hat on and my Release hat off)
>
> We are getting close to being able to remove openjdk-6 from sid and
> testing. However, there is major blocker, which is java-common itself
> (and its default-* binaries).
n-free oracle without a patch to include the Debian
specific JNI path.
~Niels
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/52a76fc4.8060...@thykier.net
ckage.
Sometimes upstream only remove/change implementation details but keep
the external API - this could be such a case.
That said, I agree that such implementation details could still have
been used by rdeps and therefore it would be prudent to do the Java
eqv. of an "ABI" bump for a C
tee)
receive no mail when your application is approved, unless the admin that
approves you remember to mail you, when they accept you.
Please check if you are already a member - odds are that someone already
approved you by now.
~Niels
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.deb
s:
* the timer is reset
* we can easier find the latest information about the bug in the bug.
:)
Particularly, the first one is important as it gives us more time to
solve the bug.
~Niels
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe
On 2014-06-05 09:40, Eugene Zhukov wrote:
> git: 'svn' is not a git command. See 'git --help'.
Looks like a dependency on "git svn", try installing git-svn.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian
On 2014-06-24 10:00, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> [adding debian-java list]
>
> On Tuesday 24 June 2014 10:14 AM, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> On 2014-06-23 14:14, Praveen Arimbrathodiyil wrote:
>>> package: javahelper, libswt-gtk-3-java
>>> severity: important
>>&
t;
Thanks for the heads up. The particular package has not been in testing
for the past 8 months[1], so it will not be a problem in regards to
removing OpenJDK-6 from testing.
~Niels
[1] Even been RC buggy for a year with no maintainer reply /o\
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ
libnb-absolutelayout-java.
* Britney only shows dependencies on a "source"-level, which may be the
source of your confusion.
~Niels
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@li
s one is fairly important.
* jetty
- There is a jetty8 now, if am not mistaking. So this probably just
needs an RM eventually.
* libreadline-java
Once again, thanks for the good times and for making the Java team a
warm and welcoming place. :)
~Niels
[1] On a personal note: Emmanuel Bo
all packages that still list me as Uploader in
their Vcs trunk/master branch.
Thanks for having me. :)
Yours truly,
~Niels
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
e package actually compiles SWT, throws it
away and uses SWT from the swt-gtk (or swt4-gtk) package. This was an
artefact of last time eclipse was not updated in a timely manner.
But in summary, have a look at the eclipse-build project[2]. This is
probably the best possible entry point to compil
the package from Jessie.
~Niels
[1] From memory, the Jenkins LTS is at most 6 months.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/552554b7.7070...@thykier.net
On 2015-04-08 22:45, Miguel Landaeta wrote:
> On Wed, 08 Apr 2015 18:17:59 +0200, Niels Thykier escribió:
>> [...]
>>
>> I had a chat with James Page and Emmanuel Bourg about Jenkins over IRC.
>> We concluded that it was infeasible for Debian to maintain Jenkins due
version used is:
$bad = 1
if $jmajlow == $MAX_BYTECODE->value('max-bytecode-version')
+ 1; # Java7 - consider bad per request.
"""
Which I suspect should be a >= under the assumption that there could
eventually be two (or more) versions betwe
will find this to be a long cruel uphill battle
with very little understanding/acceptance from Java upstreams.
Thanks,
~Niels
[1]
http://33.media.tumblr.com/8709facd551bf255501032bfa6bd9faf/tumblr_inline_mhesp3VSVC1qz4rgp.gif
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.o
version used is:
$bad = 1
if $jmajlow == $MAX_BYTECODE->value('max-bytecode-version')
+ 1; # Java7 - consider bad per request.
"""
Which I suspect should be a >= under the assumption that there could
eventually be two (or more) versions betwe
On 2015-05-26 17:25, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> On Tue, 26 May 2015, Niels Thykier wrote:
>
>> I agree that the is a good idea to clarify this. My personal
>> recommendation is to declare that:
>>
>> * gcj-jdk is not considered a suitable Java implementation f
works on
amd64, but not on i386) as long as runtime functionality is unaffected[1].
Thanks,
~Niels
[1]
http://meetbot.debian.net/debian-release/2017/debian-release.2017-04-26-19.02.html
"""
AGREED: arch:all FTBFS on i386 (where it builds fine on amd64) is
candidate for a
Markus Koschany:
> Hi,
>
> Am 29.04.2017 um 23:22 schrieb Niels Thykier:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have opted to stretch-ignore #860691 instead of unblocking the
>> jnr-posix/3.0.12-3 upload for now.
>>
>> If the tests are simply wrong on i386, then that is fine
ou have explicitly Cc'ed are
inactive or no longer in the Java team (myself included).
I am bouncing this to debian-java@l.d.o to increase its visibility (from
memory, pkg-java-maintainers@l.a.d.o gets a lot of "automated" traffic
from bugs etc.)
Quoting the rest the rest of your ma
;
> Cheers Jochen
Hi Jochen,
Ok, that is fine with me to relicense it. :)
If you find any other old eclipse-* packages of mine with anything
useful in them you are free to relicense the Debian packaging of those
under Apache-2 as well ("old" here being any such debian packaging
dget
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/swing-layout/swing-layout_1.0.3-2.dsc
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Kind regards
Niels Thykier
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
/j/javatar/javatar_2.5+dfsg-3.dsc
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Kind regards
Niels Thykier
[1] It also claims to close 486349, which was closed by the previous NMU
and is probably triggered by my acknowledgment of said NMU.
signature.asc
Description: OpenP
s.
I have appended a list of affected uploaders and their binary packages
(plus four packages, which dd-list failed to look up) if we were to
remove kaffe.
I will file a bug against cdbs (and other packages I find), which uses
kaffe as build-depends{,-indep}, if we proceed with the removal.
~Niels
Ja
ut all of them were false
positives, except the one Torsten already fixed.
~Niels
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Package: java-common
Version: 0.33
Severity: normal
I second this proposal using the java-{jre,jdk} for free and
java-{jre,jdk}-nonfree
for nonfree packages.
~Niels
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'u
Package: java-common
Version: 0.33
Severity: normal
Hi,
I second this proposal to include /usr/games in 2.3.
~Niels
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1,
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
I have committed but not tagged it on svn yet.
Kind regards
Niels Thykier
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
tags 166370 + wontfix
thanks
Hi
I think this suggest has become invalid after it was suggested.
We are trying to remove "java-virtual-machine", java{,2}-compiler and
their likes, which this suggestion seems to conflict. See #365408 [1]
for more information.
~Niels
[1] http://bugs.
rs.html#rules
>
> Thank you
Hi Matheiu.
I believe svn-inject will work for this, if you use the options
"-l 2 -O"
Also, you may want to send emails to
rather than .
p-...@l.a.d.o gets all the auto-generated emails from upload and such.
~Niels
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
the javaX-runtime packages. However [2.1] has received a few more
modifications, where I have spelled out when a VM providing package may
provide a headless vs a non-headless.
~Niels
[#1] http://www.student.dtu.dk/~s072425/debian/policy/
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefe
of trying to work without; so it might be
possible to do so, though I do not have the time currently to fight with
it.
Therefore I am considering to remove libjboss-buildmagic-java and jftp;
if anyone is using these packages and wants to keep them, please step
forward.
~Niels
--
To UNSUBSCR
ce this list receives a lot of emails from automated sources, so your
email will easily "drown" in between them.
~Niels
[1] Request For Sponsor
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
other things you should consider dealing with listed in
review.txt.
I hope you find it usefully,
~Niels
[1] Mostly intended to assist others testing your package.
Generally build in listed order, though other than [Higher level] you
should be able to build them in any other inside their
Fabian Köster wrote:
> Hi Niels,
>
> thanks a lot for your help! I really appreciated that, because I really want
> to become a Debian Maintainer and there are so many things you need to lern :)
>
>> Sounds good - You can upload it to mentors.debian.net, if you lack a
We are working on updating the policy to better fit the current times.
If you look at packages such libgnujmi-java [1], we are already
"extending" the interpretation of this particularly cause to allow the
headless versions.
If you are interested, you can see a draft of the coming policy here[
Also, please send emails to rather than
- since the latter is a
"dump" for all auto-generated emails. This may also apply to the other
pkg-$GROUP mailing lists, but though I cannot say for certain (which is
why I am replying to these lists as is).
~Niels
(From: Debian Java Team
nd regards
Niels Thykier
[1] Misspelled dependency on openjdk-6-jre
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Damien Raude-Morvan wrote:
> Le samedi 24 octobre 2009 21:41:24, Niels Thykier a écrit :
>> Dear mentors,
>
> Hi Niels,
>
>> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 3.0-10 of my package
>> "jlgui".
>
> Some comments:
> - debian/jlgui.
Niels Thykier wrote:
> Damien Raude-Morvan wrote:
>> Le samedi 24 octobre 2009 21:41:24, Niels Thykier a =E9crit :
>>> Dear mentors,
>> Hi Niels,
>>
>>> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 3.0-10 of my package
>>> "jlgui".
>
though I haven't checked beyond the ITPs/ITAs I already claimed.
@Onkar: While it is a fair assumption that only a team of DDs would be
insane enough to ITA eclipse; the truth is that the "Debian Orbital
Alignment Team"[2] only consists of 2 DMs and a "(no title)". On a
r
Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> Le jeudi 12 novembre 2009 à 00:05 +0100, Niels Thykier a écrit :
>> [...]
>> Hi
>>
>> [...]
>> One of the prime factors for not uploading to Debian yet is that eclipse
>> does not use system jars but pre-bundled ones. We are curre
he more likely they are to do so.
More or less each distribution has its own set of rules; so no one
expects you to follow each of them down to the letter. Most of them
however have a few things in common like: "Packages must be compiled
from source."
Anyhow - depending on your interest,
ything is done via that file). I admit it
would better if we could get a "per user" eclipse.ini; sadly I have not
had time to research if this is possible.
~Niels
PS: I CC'ed you because I was unsure if you were subscribed to this list.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hideki Yamane wrote:
> Hi (I'm on the list),
>
> On Sun, 15 Nov 2009 09:27:05 +0100
> Niels Thykier wrote:
>> We no longer have to search for JVMs on start up and the "Check
>> for internal browser" warnings have caused nothing short of 4 bug
>> repo
Hi,
I am looking for sponsorship for package junitperf 1.9.1-6. The
packaging bits are updated in pkg-java svn.
Here is the latest changelog entry:
junitperf (1.9.1-6) unstable; urgency=low
[ Kumar Appaiah ]
* Add a watch file.
[ Niels Thykier ]
* Added missing ${misc:Depends
quoting it.
- Added Homepage and Vcs-* fields.
* Corrected spelling in description.
* Added missing ${misc:Depends}.
* Set source "1.3" for the java-doc generation to deal javadoc errors.
-- Niels Thykier Sat, 21 Nov 2009 12:27:27 +0100
The package can also be fetche
.
- Removed the "XS-" prefix from the Vcs-* fields.
-- Niels Thykier Sat, 21 Nov 2009 14:06:30 +0100
The package can also be fetched via dget via:
http://www.student.dtu.dk/~s072425/debian/libws-commons-util_1.0.1-4.dsc
Please note: I could not make this package build with svn-buildpackage.
I
quoting it.
- Added Homepage and Vcs-* fields.
* Corrected spelling in description.
* Added missing ${misc:Depends}.
* Set source "1.3" for the java-doc generation to deal javadoc errors.
-- Niels Thykier Sat, 21 Nov 2009 12:27:27 +0100
The package can also be fetche
Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> Le samedi 21 novembre 2009 à 14:35 +0100, Niels Thykier a écrit :
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am looking for sponsorship for package avalon-framework 4.2.0-5. The
>> packaging bits are updated in pkg-java svn.
>>
>> Here is the latest change
Niels Thykier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am looking for sponsorship for package junitperf 1.9.1-6. The
> packaging bits are updated in pkg-java svn.
>
> Here is the latest changelog entry:
> junitperf (1.9.1-6) unstable; urgency=low
>
> [ Kumar Appaiah ]
> * Add a watc
Niels Thykier wrote:
> Hi
>
> I made a rather bad slip in that last RFS of libws-commons-util; so here
> goes with the correct information.
>
> I am looking for sponsorship for package libws-commons-util 1.0.1-4. The
> packaging bits are updated in pkg-java svn.
>
> H
.
-- Niels Thykier Tue, 24 Nov 2009 12:28:36 +0100
The package can also be fetched via dget via:
http://www.student.dtu.dk/~s072425/debian/jftp_1.52-2.dsc
Notes:
- This upload is done because jakarta-slide-webdavlib was recently
removed from testing and pulled jftp with it.
- lintian gives a
package.
We found a sample of how Fedora handled this for one of the jar files
[2] and I believe they build all of these jar files with the correct
metadata.
Thank you in advance,
~Niels
[1] List of jar files.
junit-3.*.jar
jsch.jar
jsp-api-2.1.jar
servlet-api-2.4.jar
servlet-api-2.5.jar
commons
; urgency=low
[ Matthias Klose ]
* Depend on default-jre-headless.
* Merge from Ubuntu:
- Move examples and documentation into a new libservlet2.4-java-doc
package.
* Set java source version to 1.4.
[ Niels Thykier ]
* Added myself to uploaders.
* Bumped Standards-Version to 3.8.3
http://packages.qa.debian.org/m/munin.html
> [2] - http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/java-policy/
> [3] - http://packages.debian.org/source/experimental/munin
>
>
Thanks for the time and effort,
~Niels
[1] Yes, I know... we should get it updated. Its on my todo-list.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-jre-headless (which is not virtual).
~Niels
[1] You should of course remove java2-runtime-headless, if the plug-ins
cannot run with java2 specification.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Niels Thykier wrote:
> Hi
>
> I am looking for a sponsor of libservlet2.4-java (5.0.30-9). I have
> committed the changes to the pkg-java svn; but since it has been changed
> to a 3.0 (quilt) source it probably will not build with svn-buildpackage.
>
>
> The lates
=low
[ Emmanuel Bourg ]
* Update of the URLs
* Rename Jakarta Commons to Apache Commons
[ Niels Thykier ]
* Added myself to uploaders.
* Updated Build-Depends(-Indep).
- Replace java-gcj-compat with default-jdk
- Move default-jdk and ant to Build-Depends.
* Made debian/rules
Damien Raude-Morvan wrote:
> Le mardi 24 novembre 2009 22:12:39, Benjamin Drung a écrit :
>> junit
>> junit4
>> libcommons-codec-java
>> libcommons-httpclient-java
>> libhamcrest-java
>
> I'll take care of addind OSGi meta-data to this packages.
>
&
we don't. They do not
seem to have any patches adding it[2]; though I admit I know hardly
anything about maven - so I would appreciate if anyone with maven
experience could tell me what I am looking for or if maven has no part
in it at all.
Thank you in advance,
~Niels
[1] http://www.ush.it/
. (Closes: #558183)
* Converted source to 3.0 (quilt).
* Made debian/rules respect errors in the clean target.
* Added descriptions to some patches.
-- Niels Thykier Sat, 28 Nov 2009 09:50:15 +0100
The package can be fetched via dget from the URL:
http://www.student.dtu.dk/~s072425/debian
r prevents proper ...
As I understand it; the solution appears to be granting permission to do
setContextClassLoader and openjdk6 is only unaffected because it lacks
some implementation on the SecurityManager area. However I am unsure
which policy file to add it to.
Thank you in advance,
~Nie
Thierry Carrez wrote:
> Niels Thykier wrote:
[...]
>
>> JVM_TMP issue
>> =
>> In Debian JVM_TMP was set to /tmp/tomcat6-tmp in the init script. I
>> suspect this is also the case in Ubuntu (at least nothing suggests that
>> it has been changed).
>
ant) and some comments or ideas for improvements,
>
Sure, I do not mind preparing a package or 5 when I am not busy.
I ran your script and noticed that it occasionally spits out an error
from dpkg-parsechangelog. I could not figure out what caused it though.
I would also like if it could p
dependency
* debian/build.xml: Fix the jar packaging to include resources
(Closes: #557306)
[ Niels Thykier ]
* Removed ${shlibs:Depends} from Depends; does not make sense for java.=
-- Niels Thykier Mon, 30 Nov 2009 22:20:10 +0100
The package can be fetched via dget from:
http
Thierry Carrez wrote:
> Niels Thykier wrote:
>> Thierry Carrez wrote:
>>> I still think /tmp is the right location for JVM temp files, since they
>>> aren't cache files and should be cleaned up at system restart. If you
>>> don't want them to be in /
-java-headless.
-- Niels Thykier Tue, 01 Dec 2009 15:08:44 +0100
The new version can be fetched via dget from:
http://www.student.dtu.dk/~s072425/debian/junitperf_1.9.1-7.dsc
Thank you in advance,
~Niels
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
omething like this you were looking for?
http://fnords.wordpress.com/2009/04/16/java-contents/
~Niels
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> Niels Thykier wrote:
>> I am looking for a sponsor of libxml-security-java (1.4.3-2). The
>> changes have already been committed to the java SVN repository.
>>
>
> Uploaded. Please tag it in the svn repository.
>
Done, thanks for sponsorin
jdk to Build-Depends-Indep.
* Package is arch: all so move dh commands to binary-indep.
* Remove empty /usr/sbin dir.
* Add Homepage.
* Add watch file.
* Bump debhelper build-dep and compat to 7.
* Bump Standards Version to 3.8.3.
[ Niels Thykier ]
* Cleaned debian/rules.
- Used de
e babel case aptitude revealed the following problem:
default-jdk-builddep depends on gcj-jdk, which conflicts with gjdoc.
This is also the case for brltty; except the gjdoc is only an indirect B-D.
~Niels
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
taking is toll on me [3].
Anyhow, Damien, this is the timeline I vision:
1. complete the upload of swt-gtk 3.5.1
2. Someone check the swt-gtk binaries + eclipse.
3. We/I finish up the OSGi problems.
At this point, depending on the result of 2. we either upload eclipse
with (renamed) swt package
integration.
Benjamin Drung (bdrung) will also work on testing the swt-gtk binaries
with eclipse as well as fetching patches from eclipse-build and follow
up on OSGi packages (making sure they propagate to Ubuntu, etc.).
Niels Thykier (nthykier) will work on fixing metadata the servlet2.5
(tomcat6) as
Pablo Duboue wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 4:10 PM, Niels Thykier wrote:
>
>> Things you can do to help us:
>> * Help me with the jetty upload. Upstream helped out - it just needs to
>> be merged with our packaging. [1]
>
> I'd like to h
.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
>
Hi Paul
I am just forwarding your mail to - that
is the list we use for debates and questions (pkg-java is for mails from
bts and automated sources).
~Niels
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
elcome to try it; though you have to tell eclipse to use the jetty
system jar - poll me if interested.
As I recall 6.1.22 is supposed to fix a security issue (one of the two
RC+security bugs); we should have that verified.
> Thanks go to Niels for quite a bit of help and to upstream for
>
t; package; it has all the suggested changes as well as
my last draft (a month or 3 old now). I have been working on a second
draft; though I have not been giving it too much attention lately.
I will see if I cannot get it completed before Christmas.
~Niels
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
need to patch the particular
ant-files to actually use them as well.
> [...]
~Niels
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
;main" java.lang.RuntimeException
at Test.main(Test.java:3)
Without:
javac -g:none Test.java && java Test
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.RuntimeException
at Test.main(Unknown Source)
By default openjdk's javac compiles with -g:lines,source (taken from the
manpage).
~Niels
[1] It could save me another draft! ;-)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
default value in init.
-- Niels Thykier Sat, 19 Dec 2009 19:11:33 +0100
It can be download from pkg-java's SVN or via dget from:
http://www.student.dtu.dk/~s072425/debian/tomcat6_6.0.20-9.dsc
~Niels
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
~Niels
Niels Thykier wrote:
> Hi
>=20
> I am looking for a sponsor jhove (1.4+dfsg-1) - this package only lists=
> the team as Uploader and not Maintainer; I have tried to reach the
> maintainer (Jeff "jab" Breidenbach[1]) for the past 14 days (via 2
> emails) wit
Hi
I am looking for a sponsor for icu4j (4.0.1.1-1) - eclipse depends on it.
Here is the latest changelog entry:
icu4j (4.0.1.1-1) unstable; urgency=low
[ Andreas Tille ]
* Watch file now detects all versions even for new major
version change
[ Niels Thykier ]
* New upstream
Build-Depends-Indep - the latter does not make
much sense for a package that only builds "arch: all" packages.
-- Niels Thykier Thu, 21 Jan 2010 17:55:05 +0100
Can be fetched with dget via:
http://www.student.dtu.dk/~s072425/debian/javatar_2.5+dfsg-4.dsc
or from the pkg-java
pkg-java-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Hi
I just forwarded this to (debate list).
~Niels
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi
I have updated libmx4j-java (see [1]).
Latest changelog entry
libmx4j-java (3.0.2-8) unstable; urgency=low
[ Michael Koch ]
* Remove Wolfgang from Uploaders.
[ Damien Raude-Morvan ]
* Remove Arnaud Vandyck from Uploaders
* Update my email address
[ Niels Thykier ]
* Added
with this package, I certainly would not mind
a pair of fresh eyes to review it.
Thank you for considering and feel free to reply if (any of) you have
any questions,
~Niels
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
(quilt).
-- Niels Thykier Sat, 06 Feb 2010 16:40:22 +0100
The package is available on the pkg-java SVN and can also be downloaded
from:
http://www.student.dtu.dk/~s072425/debian/jetty5_5.1.15+dfsg-1.dsc
~Niels
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
for apache2 license.
- Change section to java.
* Added README.source to explain how to create the orig.tar.gz.
* Removed README.Debian and NEWS, they do not apply to the new
package.
-- Niels Thykier Sat, 06 Feb 2010 16:23:06 +0100
The package is available on the pkg-java SVN and
.
* Removed reference to cdbs's simple patch system in debian/rules.
* Bumped Standards-Version to 3.8.4 - no changes required.
-- Niels Thykier Sat, 06 Feb 2010 16:39:40 +0100
The package is available on the pkg-java SVN and can also be downloaded
from:
http://www.student.dtu.dk/~s072425/d
copyright statement (and removed some extra parts
of the orig.tar.gz). Just in case you wanted to continue the review
(though I think Matthew will review it when he gets "back")
BTW: I believe Matthew also looked at libws-commons-util and jasper.
~Niels
signature.asc
Description: OpenP
symlink to the asm3-all jar.
* Bumped Standards-Version to 3.8.4 - no changes required.
* Bumped debhelper compat to 7.
-- Niels Thykier Wed, 10 Feb 2010 22:01:29 +0100
It can be found on the pkg-java SVN or downloaded from:
http://www.student.dtu.dk/~s072425/debian/asm3_3.2-3.dsc
Th
ease keep up the
> good work! I'm very thankful for it, at least.
I appreciate the thought, but the truth be told, we owe most of it to
eclipse-build and Fedora. They had made eclipse "almost build-able" by
the time we showed up - modulo the 5-10ish patches we had (and have yet)
-)D left, so it
should not be difficult to do the removal.
~Niels
[1] On a related note upstream says it "conforms to the JVM
specification version 2 (blue book)".
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
1 - 100 of 482 matches
Mail list logo
