Hi Joachim,
On 25.10.2013 20:48, Joachim Zobel wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I have a netbeans package that fixes three bugs by working around and
> which is intended for stable. How do I express this?
>
> Is a changelog entry
>
> netbeans (7.0.1+dfsg1-6) unstable; urgency=medium
>
You will usually have t
Hi,
[tony, please let me know if you received my last two private emails.]
I am looking for a sponsor for libjide-oss-java which I have updated to
the latest upstream version 3.5.10.
I think the update is sensible now because the new package adds maven
coordinates and bug fixes that accumulated
On 31.10.2013 06:58, tony mancill wrote:
> On 10/30/2013 10:02 AM, Markus Koschany wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> [tony, please let me know if you received my last two private emails.]
>
> Long overdue ACK - please excuse the delay - I'm suffering from
> overflowing inbox
Hello Reiner,
On Thu, 31. Oct 18:33 Reiner Keller wrote:
[...]
> Do you have a good solution for it which can be packaged global?
> I think that many peoply have same needs as we have. Thanks.
That's a pity. As you already know Oracle Java is non-free software, so
Debian can't and won't depend o
Hi all,
I have updated the mockobjects package a little and I'm looking for
someone who can upload it.
Changelog:
* Team upload.
* Use compat level 9 and require debhelper >= 9.
* Run wrap-and-sort -sa.
* Update Standards-Version to 3.9.5, no changes.
* Use canonical VCS-URI.
* Update debian/cop
On 10.11.2013 03:54, tony mancill wrote:
> Do we need to package the newer version of easymock?
I could package the latest upstream release of easymock. Please note
this would currently make three other packages FTBFS. See also #718869,
#717872 and #718874. Easymock 3.2 can go to experimental for
On Sun, 10. Nov 18:39 Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
[...]
> We may have to put Easymock 3.x in a new package (or spin-off the
> existing package as a new libeasymock2-java package and then upgrade
> to 3.x).
That is surely one alternative. Though now there is also the opportunity to
reduce the maintenanc
Hi,
On Sun, 10. Nov 18:29 Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
[...]
> > Do we need to package the newer version of easymock?
>
> Yes, easymock 3.2
I intend to upload 3.2 to experimental this weekend. Emmanuel has
already fixed two of the three issues that prevent an upload to
unstable. Once those three packag
Hello,
I updated libjackson-json-java to fix #722665. I agree with tony [1]
that the two symlinks to jackson-core.jar and jackson-mapper.jar are not
strictly necessary. Nowadays libjackson2-core-java supersedes
libjackson-json-java anyway. I checked the reverse dependencies,
libspring-web-java and
On 03.12.2013 07:18, tony mancill wrote:
> On 12/02/2013 02:29 AM, Markus Koschany wrote:
[...]
>> so the change should be safe.
Famous last words...
>
> Hi Markus,
>
> Thank you for updating this. I needed to tweak jasperreports and
> libspring-java to build using th
On 04.12.2013 07:09, tony mancill wrote:
[...]
> Hi Markus,
>
> Thanks for updating the r-buid-deps to quickly. Regarding
> reverse-depends, I just recently started using it myself. It's a great
> utility, although I was a little surprised to learn recently that it
> reaches out to a REST web se
Hi all,
while I was working on libjackson-json-java and Co., I saw that
libspring-java is currently affected by a potential security
vulnerability, a XML External Entity (XXE) Injection in the Spring
Framework.
The security advisory recommends that all users of version 3.x should
upgrade to 3.2.4
Hi Stephen
On 04.12.2013 22:22, Stephen Nelson wrote:
[...]
> I think it would be a pragmatic solution to backport the fix into the
> current codebase as it should clear the grave bug and shouldn't impact
> the r-deps.
Agreed. I created a new branch "stable-security" and backported the
patch to t
only be
+ enabled/disabled when the source passed to the unmarshaller is a
+ SAXSource or StreamSource. It has no effect for DOMSource or StAXSource
+ instances.
+- (Closes: #720902)
+
+ -- Markus Koschany Sat, 07 Dec 2013 11:51:46 +0100
+
libspring-java (3.0.6.RELEASE-6) uns
pring
Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2013 12:07:15 +
From: Moritz Muehlenhoff via RT
Reply-To: r...@rt.debian.org
To: a...@gambaru.de
On Sat, Dec 07, 2013 at 12:07:25PM +0000, Markus Koschany via RT wrote:
> Sat Dec 07 12:07:24 2013: Request 4815 was acted upon.
> Transaction: Ticket created by
On 30.12.2013 13:49, Miguel Landaeta wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 9:41 AM, Markus Koschany wrote:
>> I have pushed the fix to the stable-security branch of the git
>> repository and also applied the same changes to master. I'm hereby
>> looking for a sponsor who
Hello,
I have prepared a new revision for c3p0. The package is currently
affected by RC bug #725456. The testsuite hangs sometimes due to two
optional Junit tests. Both seem to spawn multiple threads during the
build process and that can cause it to hang. I think the quickest
solution is to disabl
Hi tony,
On 16.01.2014 06:38, tony mancill wrote:
[...]
> Ah, I took a look at the 0.9.5 release too and ran into the same extra
> dependency issue. (I thought it was mchange.jar, but it's same result.)
I confused mchange.jar with msearch.jar from mediathekview. I had a
similar issue there but i
Hi,
I'm looking for a sponsor for the latest version of
libjackson-json-java. Unfortunately the last upload introduced a
regression. The symlinked documentation in libjackson-json-java-doc
wasn't properly converted to a real directory. Just reverting the
responsible change will not solve the probl
Hi all,
two new security flaws were discovered in the Spring framework and bug
#735420 was filed. Both affect us. See also
http://www.gopivotal.com/security/cve-2013-6429
http://www.gopivotal.com/security/cve-2013-6430
I have created two patches based on these upstream commits:
CVE-2013-6430
==
On 24.01.2014 23:28, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 24/01/2014 20:15, Hilko Bengen a écrit :
>
>> Now, I could have just put a line like
>>
>> Maintainer: Debian Java maintainers
>>
>>
>> into the debian/control files and could have just uploaded the packages
>> after posting quick ITPs with a p
t. In most cases this
+ will result in an unexploitable parse error but in some cases it could
+ result in an XSS vulnerability.
+
+ -- Markus Koschany Mon, 27 Jan 2014 15:56:41 +0100
+
libspring-java (3.0.6.RELEASE-6+deb7u1) wheezy-security; urgency=high
* Team upload.
diff -Nru
Hi Eugene,
On 03.02.2014 13:02, Eugene Zhukov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I see a bunch of bugs similar to #737464 fired recently against some
> java packages.
> We have a Lintian pedantic warning for that [0]. All the packages
> having this problem are mentioned in the very same page.
> May I ask why we
Hi all,
I have prepared a new release for freemind which is currently affected
by bug #736105 and I am looking for a sponsor to upload it.
I downloaded the missing sources from upstream's git repository and
created an extra source tarball, so that freemind consists of two
different source tarball
Hi Felix,
On 19.02.2014 20:59, Felix Natter wrote:
> Markus Koschany writes:
[...]
> I will soon package Freeplane's flash browser (which is almost the same
> as FreeMind's flash browser) for Debian, and I wonder about the license
> (what to put in debian/copyright)?
>
On Thu, 20. Feb 08:54 Paul Wise wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 11:53 PM, Markus Koschany wrote:
>
> > I downloaded the missing sources from upstream's git repository and
> > created an extra source tarball, so that freemind consists of two
> > different source tarba
Hello Paul,
On 21.02.2014 03:10, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 11:21 PM, Markus Koschany wrote:
>
>> Gnash is able to handle that too.
>
> You've tested that gnash works with this particular Flash program?
Yeah, sure I did.
>> However I have no pref
Hi Matthew,
On 20.02.2014 18:22, Matthew Vernon wrote:
[...]
> libopensaml2-java_2.6.1-1_all.deb
> depends upon
> libopenws-java_1.5.1-1_all.deb
> depends upon
> libxmltooling-java_1.4.2-1_all.deb
>
[...]
>
> I'd be interested in comments on all of these - are they good enough to
> be pushed int
Hello,
On 12.03.2014 16:50, Matthew Vernon wrote:
[...]
> I've uploaded libowasp-antisamy-java and libowasp-esapi-java to
> experimental, including their relevant -doc packages. Unless someone
> tells me I shouldn't, I'll create git repos for them under pkg-java at
> some point in the vaguely-near
On 13.03.2014 17:03, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've completed the update of wagon and wagon2 to work with EasyMock 3.x.
> I also reviewed the other reverse dependencies, they all compile fine
> except libgroboutils-java which is already broken and about to be
> removed by its maintainer.
On 13.03.2014 17:27, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 13/03/2014 17:22, Markus Koschany a écrit :
>
>> woohoo! :) Awesome. Ready when you are. If nobody objects, I'll go ahead
>> with the upload tomorrow.
Done.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi,
I have prepared a new upstream release with minor bug fixes and
documentation improvements for osgi-core. I would be glad if someone had
the time to review and upload the package.
The package can be found on mentors and alioth:
https://mentors.debian.net/package/osgi-core
http://anonscm.deb
*bump*
On 19.02.2014 16:53, Markus Koschany wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have prepared a new release for freemind which is currently affected
> by bug #736105 and I am looking for a sponsor to upload it.
I'm still looking for a sponsor for freemind which got removed from
testing d
On Mon, 17. Mar 21:50 tony mancill wrote:
[...]
> Hi Markus,
>
> Thanks for the update.
>
Thank you tony!
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi Stephen,
On 23.03.2014 18:05, Stephen Nelson wrote:
> Hi team,
>
> I had a look at packaging the latest release of Azureus/Vuze and have
> managed to get the app working without too many issues. Some bugs
> against the package indicate the current packaging isn't up to scratch.
>
> I've not w
On 31.03.2014 15:40, Miguel Landaeta wrote:
[...]
> Help with this is more than welcome, of course.
I have committed some changes to svnkit two weeks ago and tried to build
the latest upstream release. [1] My impression is that we need a new
version of libtrilead-ssh2-java first and that the packa
On 31.03.2014 22:22, Niels Thykier wrote:
[...]
> Pro-tip for dealing with these kind of auto-removals: If you CC the bug
> in your updates:
> * the timer is reset
> * we can easier find the latest information about the bug in the bug.
>:)
>
> Particularly, the first one is important as it g
Control: tags -1 patch
On 01.04.2014 14:21, Markus Koschany wrote:
[...]
> I have to do more smoke testing with svnkit and trilead-ssh2 but will
> get back to the list as soon as it's done.
Hi,
I have tested all reverse dependencies of svnkit and they seem to work.
Only netbeans c
Hi,
I have updated electric to the latest upstream release and added
myself to Uploaders, since the package seemed pretty much neglected
and it is still a very useful piece of software. Now I'm looking for
a sponsor to upload the package.
Electric is available on mentors:
http://mentors.debian.n
On 03.04.2014 15:34, Miguel Landaeta wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 07:00:35PM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote:
>>
>> I have tested all reverse dependencies of svnkit and they seem to work.
>> Only netbeans could not be tested because it's affected by another RC bug.
I also think that having OpenJDK 8 as the default would be preferable.
However fixing 80+ FTBFS bugs in time might be quite of a feat depending
on the type of the problem. I suggest to file bug reports for all those
bugs first. Severity important seems to be reasonable at the beginning.
If it turns
Hi,
On 16.04.2014 23:54, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here is a status report on the Java 8 transition:
>
[...]
>
> Issues blocking the upload:
> - debian/copyright update
I am going to look into this.
Markus
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi,
I have reviewed the current OpenJDK 8 packaging based on the sources
available from
http://87.98.165.193/debian/openjdk-8u5-b13/
and committed the new file to the openjdk-8 git repository.
I didn't find anything suspicious. Changes had to be made in regard to
licenses of third party softwar
Hello,
I updated electric to the latest upstream version and I'm looking for a
sponsor to upload it:
Changelog:
* Imported Upstream version 9.05+dfsg.
* Add signing-key.pgp and check for valid upstream tarballs with uscan's
pgpsigurlmangle feature.
* Move the package to Git.
The new package i
On 04.06.2014 16:07, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I prepared a script to migrate a package from SVN to Git. I tested it on
> a couple of packages and it seems to work fine. The script is available
> on alioth at:
>
> http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-java/pkg-java-svn2git.git
>
Hi all,
I updated the hawtjni source package and imported the latest upstream
release, 1.10. Now I'm looking for a sponsor to upload the package. This
update also fixes a security vulnerability (#708293). I am not sure if
it warrants a DSA since only Jansi is theoretically affected but I think
it
On 11.07.2014 02:02, Miguel Landaeta wrote:
[...]
> Hi Markus,
>
> I'll sponsor it.
Hi Miguel,
Thanks! I've just pushed a new branch, wheezy-security, which includes
the fix for a stable or security update.
Cheers,
Markus
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi,
I have finished the work of Emmanuel who pushed some commits in April.
This update installs the latest upstream release of felix-main and fixes
a FTBFS bug in this process. I intend to update felix-framework too. At
the moment it looks like as if the updated package introduces no
regressions.
Hello,
here is the second part of the felix-* update. I updated felix-framework
to version 4.4.0 and I'm looking for a sponsor now.
Changelog:
* Team upload.
* Imported Upstream version 4.4.0.
* Drop 01-java8-compatibility.patch. Fixed upstream.
* Update debian/copyright to copyright format 1.0
Hi José,
On 14.07.2014 15:14, José Robson Mariano Alves wrote:
[...]
> I read about sponsorship and would like more information as the software
> fits in this group.
> And this is it all, my english is poor, so forgive the coherence. XD
you are right that debian-java is surely a good place for Ja
On 16.07.2014 07:54, tony mancill wrote:
> On 07/14/2014 03:56 AM, Markus Koschany wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> here is the second part of the felix-* update. I updated felix-framework
>> to version 4.4.0 and I'm looking for a sponsor now.
[...]
> Uploaded.
Hi tony,
On 28.08.2014 00:24, tony mancill wrote:
[...]
First of all thank you for this very informative post.
[...]
> Sustainability/Maintainability:
>
> I made a strawman statement about whether we might consider paring down
> Java within Debian to just a JDK and a few core packages (e.g. tom
Hello,
I am working on the Debian Games Pure Blend [1] to facilitate the
installation and development of games and to increase the visibility of
free software games and developer tools in and outside of Debian.
I have created a task for the development of games in the Java
programming language [2
Control: tags -1 patch
Hi,
I have prepared a new revision for axis which addresses the security
vulnerability, bug #762444, and I am looking for someone who wants to
review and upload the package.
The package can either be found at mentors.debian.net
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a
e,
+ which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers via a
+ certificate with a subject that specifies a common name in a field
+ that is not the CN field. NOTE: this issue exists because of an
+ incomplete fix for CVE-2012-5784.
+
+ -- Markus Koschany Wed, 01 Oc
Hi Tim,
On 01.10.2014 03:16, Potter, Tim (Cloud Services) wrote:
> Hi everyone. I've put together my own packaging for the
> jackson-datatype-guava library, based mostly on the
> jackson-datavalue-yaml packaging which seemed pretty similar. Could
> someone please give it a bit of a review?
>
On 02.10.2014 08:39, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Hi Markus
>
> As mentioned in [1,2] we do not use anymore the RT queues (a change from
> DSA to disable them completely is pending).
>
> [1] https://wiki.debian.org/rt.debian.org#Security_Team
> [2] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announc
On 02.10.2014 13:26, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
[...]
> Thanks for getting in touch with us! Please fix this through a point update.
Hi,
I have just filed https://bugs.debian.org/763815 and now I am waiting
for a response from the release team.
Cheers,
Markus
signature.asc
Description: OpenPG
Hello,
I have packaged JChart2D, a library for precise 2D charting visualizations and
I am looking for a sponsor who can upload the package.
JChart2D is a new dependency of MediathekView 8 and closes ITP bug #626243.
The source package is maintained at:
http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-java/l
Hi all,
I have recently adopted Robocode, a Java programming game, and I think
it fits best into the Java team. It is currently affected by RC bug
#766068 that prevents users from starting the game. This is a rather old
version. Unfortunately it's too late now to package the latest release
since i
Hi Emmanuel,
On Tue, 21. Oct 00:19 Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Hi Markus,
>
> Do you think you could clone to alioth and then update the packaging
> repository from Github [1] instead of creating a new one? That would be
> nice to preserve the change history.
I deliberately decided not to clone the
On 21.10.2014 19:46, Miguel Landaeta wrote:
> I think it doesn't hurt to preserve the history of the package if it
> was already maintained in a git repo.
>
> I merged your changes in this repo:
> http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-java/robocode2.git
>
> If you are OK with that, I can rename this
Hi Achim,
On 23.10.2014 06:10, tony mancill wrote:
> On 10/13/2014 06:32 AM, Markus Koschany wrote:
[...]
> Hi Markus,
>
> Things look pretty good with this package. There are a total of (3)
> files that don't carry a license, and all of them are by the same
> upstream
Hi Tim,
On 24.10.2014 04:09, Potter, Tim (Cloud Services) wrote:
[...]
> I managed to get all of this done, including the unit tests but ended up
> trashing my old repo and overwriting it with a new one. I made a huge
> mess of the original sources and redid everything using the upstream
> tar.g
On 23.10.2014 12:46, Markus Koschany wrote:
[...]
> On 23.10.2014 06:10, tony mancill wrote:
>> On 10/13/2014 06:32 AM, Markus Koschany wrote:
> [...]
>> Hi Markus,
>>
>> Things look pretty good with this package. There are a total of (3)
>> files that don&#x
On 29.10.2014 17:17, Paul Wise wrote:
> Hi Java folks,
>
> On debian-mentors (both IRC and list) we sometimes get Java packaging
> related questions. As there are few people in debian-mentors (IRC/list)
> who know about Java, currently we just redirect Java related packaging
> questions to debian-
On 08.11.2014 22:17, Bill Zaumen wrote:
[...]
> The problem is that extensions are really java libraries but the
> Debian policy for libraries does not cover them as it does not allow
> the libraries to be installed in the correct location. Either that
> policy needs to be modified or a new sectio
Hi all,
I have updated the robocode package to the latest upstream release. This
version includes major packaging changes since Robocode moved from Ant
to Maven. All licensing issues have been resolved. The new libraries
were already uploaded by Tony and Emmanuel and now I am looking for
someone w
Hi,
I think I have fixed the bug that caused all those RC bugs against
eclipse and affected other packages like androidsdk-tools. I would
appreciate another look though. The new revision is ready in Git. I hope
we can get -6 past the release team too. The changes seem to be manageable and
I don't
On Wed, 26. Nov 17:39 Alastair McKinstry wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm packaging thredds, netcdf-java.
> After some effort (I'm not really a Java programmer) I got mh_make to
> succeed, but when I try to build
> the package I get:
Hi,
could you uplo
I have packaged the latest upstream version of objenesis since I was
also working on easymock 3.3. Both projects are closely related. I
have checked that all reverse-dependencies in sid still build from
source except two packages that FTBFS due to some other reasons and are
not part of testing anyw
On 05.12.2014 11:23, Samuel Stachelski wrote:
> Hey all debian java devs
>
> I am new to the whole packaging thing in debian (read the docs but no
> experience yet) and I have a question for java packaging:
> When I want to package a java application which has a reference to a
> proprietary libr
On 05.12.2014 13:33, Samuel Stachelski wrote:
[...]
> The devs advices me to not waste my time with trying to push their software
> to debian.
> What is your opinion then? Should I try to upload it or spend my time on
> something more useful maybe?
I agree with them. You shouldn't waste your tim
Hi all,
I have prepared a fix for RC bug https://bugs.debian.org/764630
"missing JNI multi-arch PATHs in jarwrapper" and committed this change
to Git master. Currently jarwrapper does not use multiarch jni library
paths and only looks for libraries in /usr/lib/jni. Actually we could
get rid of -D
On 12.12.2014 07:05, tony mancill wrote:
[...]
> Any concerns from the team? This is kind of a brute force approach, but
> seems reasonable. My question is:
>
> Do we feel confident that this the lists below are representative for
> for jessie?
>
>> MULTIARCH_LIBRARY_PATH_32BIT="/usr/lib/jni:/u
Hi,
On Mon, 15. Dec 12:31 Jacob Anawalt wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm exploring writing some custom programs in Java that will be
> deployed on Debian stable systems and I am reaching out for some
> advice on best practices.
>
> At the moment I am dipping my toe into the Maven waters. I've worked
> thr
On Sun, 21. Dec 09:57 tony mancill wrote:
> On 12/15/2014 12:06 AM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 6:50 PM, Markus Koschany wrote:
> > [...]
> >> Actually what was the reasoning behind the choice to use a custom shell
> >> script like jarwra
Hi Pascal,
On 09.01.2015 19:43, Pascal Rapicault wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My name is Pascal Rapicault. I'm a long time committer on the Eclipse
> platform, and I've recently been tasked by Ericsson to:
> 1 - bring new versions of Eclipse to debian
> 2 - make sure the experience of using eclipse on debian
I think Paul and Emmanuel have answered the general questions already,
so I'd just like to comment on these questions.
On 13.01.2015 21:09, Pascal Rapicault wrote:
> What drives the decision to package certain Eclipse libraries as system
> jars and not others (e.g. swt and osgi, but not emf or jfa
Hi folks,
I am working on an update for felix-main and felix-framework. While I
was at it I discovered that more and more dependencies had to be updated
as well.
So far the following packages were updated:
felix-main
felix-gogo-command
felix-gogo-runtime
felix-bundlerepository
osgi-compendium
os
On 21.02.2015 15:58, Miguel Landaeta wrote:
[...]
>
> Uploaded.
>
> Thanks,
Thank you! I have packaged osgi-annotation-java and together with a new
build-dependency, libasm4-java, this ensures that felix-framework 4.6.0
compiles successfully now. Although osgi-annotation-java 6.0.0 works
with th
On 21.02.2015 20:37, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 21/02/2015 20:28, Markus Koschany a écrit :
>
>> Therefore I intend to file an ITP bug for osgi-annotation-java and
>> update osgi-core and osgi-compendium to 6.0.0.
>>
>> Any objections?
>
> I don't know m
On 21.02.2015 22:32, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Java programmers,
Hi Andreas,
>
> I wonder whether you could help to replace some outdated code in
> libcolt-java which has some old code from src/hep.aida.* which is LGPL
> but no military exception. The code is old, was rewritten in
>http://j
On 22.02.2015 09:47, Andreas Tille wrote:
[...]
> Whatever helps to get a free functionality of libcolt-java would be
> really helpful.
>
I think Emmanuel has already pointed in the right directions. Just to
clarify what exactly is controversial or difficult and has to be done.
The *.java files
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Markus Koschany
* Package name: osgi-annotation
Version : 6.0.0
Upstream Author : OSGi Alliance
* URL : http://www.osgi.org
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang: Java
Description : Java OSGi API - annotation
On 23.02.2015 18:04, Markus Koschany wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Markus Koschany
>
> * Package name: osgi-annotation
> Version : 6.0.0
> Upstream Author : OSGi Alliance
> * URL : http://www.osgi.org
> * L
On 22.02.2015 00:40, Miguel Landaeta wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 08:28:26PM +0100, Markus Koschany wrote:
>>
>> Therefore I intend to file an ITP bug for osgi-annotation-java and
>> update osgi-core and osgi-compendium to 6.0.0.
>>
>> Any objections?
>
>
On 24.02.2015 05:28, Alexandre Viau wrote:
>
> Hello, debian-java.
>
> Syncany is an open-source cloud storage and filesharing application. It
> allows users to backup and share certain folders of their workstations
> using any kind of storage, e.g. FTP, SFTP, WebDAV, Amazon S3 and Samba.
Hello,
I'm curious about the status of eclipse-pydev.
https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-java/eclipse-pydev.git
Why was it rejected by the ftp team and what needs to be done to upload
it again?
Regards,
Markus
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 26.02.2015 18:02, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 26/02/2015 17:54, Markus Koschany a écrit :
>> I'm curious about the status of eclipse-pydev.
>>
>> https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-java/eclipse-pydev.git
>>
>> Why was it rejected by the ftp team and what
Hi,
I have updated and verified debian/copyright and imported the latest
upstream release of eclipse-pydev. I had to rebase a couple of patches
especially this one [1] which was rather confusing. I'm quite new to
packaging Eclipse plugins but I wonder if there is no better solution
than patching v
Hi Jakub,
On 27.02.2015 23:01, Jakub Adam wrote:
> Hi Markus,
>
> On 27.2.2015 18:45, Markus Koschany wrote:
>> I had to rebase a couple of patches
>> especially this one [1] which was rather confusing. I'm quite new to
>> packaging Eclipse plugins but I wonde
Hi Felix,
On 27.02.2015 22:08, Felix Natter wrote:
[...]
> @Team:
> Would someone want to review the package at the temporary location (see
> above)?
>
here is a brief review:
I don't see a major blocker but a few bits could be improved.
debian/changelog:
should be 5.1.0+dfsg1-1 instead of 5.
Hi,
On 02.03.2015 05:53, Alexandre Viau wrote:
[...]
> Unertow's unpackaged dependencies:
> - org.jboss.classfilewriter
> - org.jboss.logging
> - org.jboss.logmanager
> - org.jboss.spec.javax.[servlet/annotation/servlet.jsp/websocket]
> - org.jboss.xnio
> - com.h2database (RFP#607891) (Only a test
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Markus Koschany
* Package name: jboss-classfilewriter
Version : 1.0.5.Final
Upstream Author : Stuart Douglas
* URL : https://github.com/jbossas/jboss-classfilewriter
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang: Java
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Markus Koschany
* Package name: jboss-logmanager
Version : 1.5.4.Final
Upstream Author : Red Hat, Inc.
* URL : https://github.com/jboss-logging/jboss-logmanager
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang: Java
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Markus Koschany
* Package name: jboss-modules
Version : 1.4.1.Final
Upstream Author : Red Hat, Inc.
* URL : https://github.com/jboss-modules/jboss-modules
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang: Java
Description
On 02.03.2015 21:19, Felix Natter wrote:
[...]
>> docs:
>>
>> There are some experimental Lintian warnings about duplicate
>> documentation files. Since there are only a few of them, it's not really
>> a big deal but I would examine again if there are some overlaps between
>> upstream's docs direct
On 02.03.2015 17:55, Markus Koschany wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Markus Koschany
>
> * Package name: jboss-classfilewriter
> Version : 1.0.5.Final
> Upstream Author : Stuart Douglas
> * URL : https://github.com/jboss
On 02.03.2015 18:06, Markus Koschany wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Markus Koschany
>
> * Package name: jboss-logmanager
> Version : 1.5.4.Final
> Upstream Author : Red Hat, Inc.
> * URL : https://github.com/jboss-
1 - 100 of 723 matches
Mail list logo
