Hi Matthew, On 20.02.2014 18:22, Matthew Vernon wrote: [...] > libopensaml2-java_2.6.1-1_all.deb > depends upon > libopenws-java_1.5.1-1_all.deb > depends upon > libxmltooling-java_1.4.2-1_all.deb > [...] > > I'd be interested in comments on all of these - are they good enough to > be pushed into unstable? Some of them have old RFPs, others I'll have to > make an ITP. I'm aware they're not perfect (docs and tests would seem > like good goals), but I'd like to think they're almost good enough for > unstable now.
just a few remarks for some of the packages. In general the basic maven based packaging looks good. However I wouldn't patch the pom files because that's what the mangling in maven.rules is for. not-yet-commons-ssl source: source-contains-prebuilt-java-object lib/commons-httpclient-3.0.jar You need to remove all prebuilt jar files. libopensaml2-java libopenws-java libxmltooling-java Lintian emits: debian-watch-file-is-missing source-contains-svn-control-dir If you really intend to maintain all of them for the foreseeable future, I would start with libnot-yet-commons-ssl-java libowasp-antisamy-java libowasp-esapi-java libvt-ldap-java and prepare them for experimental not unstable. However libraries should be accompanied with documentation, so I would recommend to add -doc packages to all of them too. Then we can narrow down the other issues step-by-step, otherwise it's simply too overwhelming. Regards, Markus
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
