T. Alexander Popiel wrote:
>In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Kenneth Pronovici <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>>I maintain libnbio-java, which is a JNI non-blocking socket IO package
>>for Java. My current .deb is for upstream version 1.5. The upstream
>>maintainer has just rel
Package: jikes
Tag: sid
Severity: serious
The new version of Jikes, namely 1.16, is not suitable for release.
It contains some strange miscompilation errors. My current strategy
is to attempt to fix them and/or use the upstream patches to fix these
bugs.
If we get close to the next release (sarg
On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 05:38:59PM +0100, Jan Krupa wrote:
> Which distribution do you mean is better?
> from sun j2sdk1.4.1_01 (j2sdk1.3.1) or from blackdown
> j2sdk-1.4.1-beta-linux-i586.bin (j2sdk1.3.1-linux...) or from something
> else?
> Which one is the most complete? What is the differenc
On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 10:27:31PM +0100, Grzegorz B. Prokopski wrote:
> W li?cie z ?ro, 19-02-2003, godz. 20:08, Adam Majer pisze:
> Let me see.
> greg@greg:~$ apt-cache search jikes
> jikes-sable - Wrapper for jikes using classes from SableVM
> * SableVM IS THE NAME of the proje
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 11:09:01AM +0100, Grzegorz B. Prokopski wrote:
> A word from Etienne M. Gagnon - upstream author (forwarded).
He sent a message because _you_ told him to do so by ccing him in the
middle of something that's only _Debian_ specific. Well, unless
they have something called jik
On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 11:19:28PM -0600, adamm wrote:
> jikes-sable - Wrapper for jikes using classes from SableVM
>
>
>
> [ ] - change jikes-sable to jikes-sablevm
> [ ] - leave as is
>
>
>
> If I receive less than 5 votes, the name stays. Greg and I don't count :)
The votes
On Sat, Sep 06, 2003 at 03:03:29PM -0400, Grzegorz B. Prokopski wrote:
> On Sat, 2003-09-06 at 14:32, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > What you are missing is that Debian binary packages must stay in sync with
> > their source package, which means that all of the packages that jikes builds
> > are handled
On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 08:10:31PM -0500, Ean Schuessler wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-09-19 at 19:11, Grzegorz B. Prokopski wrote:
> > > Eventually Kaffe will have dozens or hundreds of wrappers
> > What?!? What dozens? We're *probably* talking about *ONE* wrapper that
> > is already in the distro thought
On Sat, Jan 17, 2004 at 12:44:34AM -0500, Grzegorz B. Prokopski wrote:
> [*] This is completly irrelevant that jikes is currently held by
> Kaffe. Tomorrow it may be held by SableVM, and in a week by Classpath
> or GIJ.
Jikes only needs *any* version to be in testing. A given package has
to be re
On Sun, Jan 18, 2004 at 11:04:55PM +0100, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> Adam Majer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Jikes only needs *any* version to be in testing. A given package has
> > to be removed from testing for the current problems to occur.
> > Hopefully, kaffe w
On Sun, Jan 18, 2004 at 09:49:44PM -0500, Grzegorz B. Prokopski wrote:
> W li?cie z nie, 18-01-2004, godz. 19:41, Adam Majer pisze:
> > PS. Furthermore, since these wrappers are NOT and should not be dependent
> > on version of the JVM (or kaffe), they should be maintained such tha
On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 11:51:50PM +0100, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> Adam Majer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > It doesn't really matter to me. I just need everyone to agree on this
> > so that the wrappers don't simply dissapear. Grzegorz (SableVM) surely
>
Hi,
I put all the jikes wrappers and their debhelper stuff in
http://people.debian.org/~adamm/jikes-wrappers/
so you can just download the relevent parts and include them.
Please keep the priority levels for the javac alternative.
- Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 01:46:40PM +0100, Daniel Bonniot wrote:
> Stefan Gybas wrote:
>
> >Daniel Bonniot wrote:
> >
> >>One solution to this (which I found at
> >>http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg10605.html)
> >>would be to temporily make new (empty) versions of the jikes-* pack
On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 02:00:12PM -0500, Andrew Pimlott wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 17, 2004 at 12:44:34AM -0500, Grzegorz B. Prokopski wrote:
> > These JVMs are encouraged and free to move these one-file wrappers to
> > their own packages (which in turn will probably Depend: on jikes or
> > make it Reco
On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 03:44:21PM -0500, Andrew Pimlott wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 12:15:27AM -0600, Adam Majer wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 02:00:12PM -0500, Andrew Pimlott wrote:
> > > Irrespective of the testing issue, it seems obvious that just as the
> > &
Hi,
I think I'm going to reintroduce jikes-gij as part of jikes
source. It might be the lesser of two evils. I think that
adding jikes-gij to gcc is not the best idea :) And jikes-gij
is not going to slow down jikes anyway since gcc is priority
important and has an entire team working on it.
- A
Ben Burton wrote:
Hi.. does anyone happen to know if jikes-gij is coming back at some
point?
I ask because jython currently build-depends on jikes-gij, and I don't
want to have to hardcode the bootstrap classpath since this will
(presumably) keep having to be changed with even minor gij/gcj upgrade
Adam Majer wrote:
Ben Burton wrote:
Hi.. does anyone happen to know if jikes-gij is coming back at some
point?
I ask because jython currently build-depends on jikes-gij, and I don't
want to have to hardcode the bootstrap classpath since this will
(presumably) keep having to be changed with
Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
Again, I deeply appreciate your work but I admonish you to follow
procedure or I will take this up with Project leadership.
I do not appreciate the way you deal with the situation. Sending this
mail to the public list before even trying to talk with me is not a way
to p
elijah wright wrote:
You simply making Arnaud the official maintainer sounds like a good idea.
Several people have mentioned that it is "a nice thing" to leave you as
the maintainer because this is your "last debian package", but i submit
that that *has* to cease to be an issue if you're not going
Ean Schuessler wrote:
In any case, I have decided to continue with my maintainership and have an
alarming appetite for flamemail when I've put my mind to something. In the
interest of saving everyone keystrokes I move that we get used to the fact
that I am still the maintainer and talk about mov
Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
Take an account on Alioth (it'll be the same as your Debian login), drop
me a mail when you have your account and I'll add you to pkg-java
project. After that, we can setup a separate mailing list, then upload
kaffe with you and me as Uploaders and the list as the official
mai
#119551 or to upgrade wholesale to the
> > Colin> upstream major-bug-fix release mentioned in #133616?
>
> I've since discovered that said release (1.15b) also fixes bug #123041.
>
> > Adam Majer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> filed an ITA on jikes, have
> > yo
Hi all,
At this moment I am the maintainer for Jikes. The one thing that I
do not like about the package is that it does not work out of the
box without some intervention from the user. That is, CLASSPATH
needs to be defined.
The trouble is that I don't think it is up to me to decide which
java
On Sat, Mar 30, 2002 at 08:12:09AM -0500, Jesse wrote:
> On Fri, 2002-03-29 at 22:59, Adam Majer wrote:
> > [1] - Kaffe
> > [2] - Other [admin enters path]
> > [3] - IBM JDK
> > [4] - Sun.
> > etc...
> >
>
> Don't forget Blackdown.
Which pa
On Sun, Mar 31, 2002 at 02:13:32PM -0800, Stephen Zander wrote:
> > "Colin" == Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Colin> That sounds like it would work better with autobuilders,
> Colin> too - you could build-depend on jikes (>= foo), invoke
> Colin> jikes-kaffe, and expect
On Sat, Apr 13, 2002 at 09:51:13PM +0200, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote:
> Robert Bihlmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Oh, you don't seem to know the path from the top of your head! Me
> > neither. That's the point of jikes-kaffe: relieving you from having to
> > remember the obscure bootclasses p
On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 09:19:13PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> So, kaffe would add an alternative of
> /wherever/kaffe/puts/Klasses.jar for (eg)
> /usr/share/java/bootclasses.jar . And jikes would take its
> bootclasspath (by default) from /usr/shar/java/bootclasses.jar.
> Using bootclass
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 10:32:06AM -0700, A.J. Rossini wrote:
> > "tony" == tony mancill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> tony> For both cases, would it possible to post the kernel version of the
> test
> tony> box? Maybe it's part of the equation.
>
> (I actually did, privately, to
On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 06:44:47PM +0200, Philipp Meier wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 10:07:35PM -0500, Adam Majer wrote:
> > On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 10:32:06AM -0700, A.J. Rossini wrote:
> > > >>>>> "tony" == tony mancill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wri
T. Alexander Popiel wrote:
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Kenneth Pronovici <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I maintain libnbio-java, which is a JNI non-blocking socket IO package
for Java. My current .deb is for upstream version 1.5. The upstream
maintainer has just released version
Package: jikes
Tag: sid
Severity: serious
The new version of Jikes, namely 1.16, is not suitable for release.
It contains some strange miscompilation errors. My current strategy
is to attempt to fix them and/or use the upstream patches to fix these
bugs.
If we get close to the next release (sarge)
ioned in #119551 or to upgrade wholesale to the
> > Colin> upstream major-bug-fix release mentioned in #133616?
>
> I've since discovered that said release (1.15b) also fixes bug #123041.
>
> > Adam Majer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> filed an ITA on jikes, have
> > yo
Hi all,
At this moment I am the maintainer for Jikes. The one thing that I
do not like about the package is that it does not work out of the
box without some intervention from the user. That is, CLASSPATH
needs to be defined.
The trouble is that I don't think it is up to me to decide which
jav
On Sat, Mar 30, 2002 at 08:12:09AM -0500, Jesse wrote:
> On Fri, 2002-03-29 at 22:59, Adam Majer wrote:
> > [1] - Kaffe
> > [2] - Other [admin enters path]
> > [3] - IBM JDK
> > [4] - Sun.
> > etc...
> >
>
> Don't forget Blackdown.
Which pa
On Sun, Mar 31, 2002 at 02:13:32PM -0800, Stephen Zander wrote:
> > "Colin" == Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Colin> That sounds like it would work better with autobuilders,
> Colin> too - you could build-depend on jikes (>= foo), invoke
> Colin> jikes-kaffe, and expect
On Sat, Apr 13, 2002 at 09:51:13PM +0200, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote:
> Robert Bihlmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Oh, you don't seem to know the path from the top of your head! Me
> > neither. That's the point of jikes-kaffe: relieving you from having to
> > remember the obscure bootclasses
On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 09:19:13PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> So, kaffe would add an alternative of
> /wherever/kaffe/puts/Klasses.jar for (eg)
> /usr/share/java/bootclasses.jar . And jikes would take its
> bootclasspath (by default) from /usr/shar/java/bootclasses.jar.
> Using bootclas
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 10:32:06AM -0700, A.J. Rossini wrote:
> > "tony" == tony mancill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> tony> For both cases, would it possible to post the kernel version of the test
> tony> box? Maybe it's part of the equation.
>
> (I actually did, privately, to Bi
On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 06:44:47PM +0200, Philipp Meier wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 10:07:35PM -0500, Adam Majer wrote:
> > On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 10:32:06AM -0700, A.J. Rossini wrote:
> > > >>>>> "tony" == tony mancill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&
On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 05:38:59PM +0100, Jan Krupa wrote:
> Which distribution do you mean is better?
> from sun j2sdk1.4.1_01 (j2sdk1.3.1) or from blackdown
> j2sdk-1.4.1-beta-linux-i586.bin (j2sdk1.3.1-linux...) or from something
> else?
> Which one is the most complete? What is the differenc
On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 10:27:31PM +0100, Grzegorz B. Prokopski wrote:
> W li?cie z ?ro, 19-02-2003, godz. 20:08, Adam Majer pisze:
> Let me see.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ apt-cache search jikes
> jikes-sable - Wrapper for jikes using classes from SableVM
> * SableVM IS THE NAME
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 11:09:01AM +0100, Grzegorz B. Prokopski wrote:
> A word from Etienne M. Gagnon - upstream author (forwarded).
He sent a message because _you_ told him to do so by ccing him in the
middle of something that's only _Debian_ specific. Well, unless
they have something called jik
On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 11:19:28PM -0600, adamm wrote:
> jikes-sable - Wrapper for jikes using classes from SableVM
>
>
>
> [ ] - change jikes-sable to jikes-sablevm
> [ ] - leave as is
>
>
>
> If I receive less than 5 votes, the name stays. Greg and I don't count :)
The votes
On Sat, Sep 06, 2003 at 03:03:29PM -0400, Grzegorz B. Prokopski wrote:
> On Sat, 2003-09-06 at 14:32, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > What you are missing is that Debian binary packages must stay in sync with
> > their source package, which means that all of the packages that jikes builds
> > are handled
On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 08:10:31PM -0500, Ean Schuessler wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-09-19 at 19:11, Grzegorz B. Prokopski wrote:
> > > Eventually Kaffe will have dozens or hundreds of wrappers
> > What?!? What dozens? We're *probably* talking about *ONE* wrapper that
> > is already in the distro thought
47 matches
Mail list logo
