On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 10:27:31PM +0100, Grzegorz B. Prokopski wrote:
> W li?cie z ?ro, 19-02-2003, godz. 20:08, Adam Majer pisze:
> Let me see.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ apt-cache search jikes
> jikes-sable - Wrapper for jikes using classes from SableVM
> * SableVM IS THE NAME of the project - "sable" is misleading
> jikes-sun - Wrapper for jikes using Blackdown classes
> * Sun is SUN - there's no such thing as SunVM or sth. (google finds only
> 36 results for "sunvm" and 144 for "sunjvm")
Sun Microsystems do much more than java yet that is very clearly implied
since jikes is not going to compile using "classes from UltraSPARC server" :)
> Now I understand that you removed "VM" to simplyfy and remove redundant
> or default information.
>
> But that's just not the right thing to do in that specific case.
> > Is this really such a serious problem to justify a name change?
> Shortly - yes.
Well, I don't. I haven't seen any emails citing problems with
calling Jikes + SableVM = jikes-sable
So I'm puting this up to a vote. Everyone that cares, send me votes
in private and I'll tally them up by Sunday, Feb 23 2003
NOTE: The description says:
jikes-sable - Wrapper for jikes using classes from SableVM
----
[ ] - change jikes-sable to jikes-sablevm
[ ] - leave as is
----
If I receive less than 5 votes, the name stays. Greg and I don't count :)
Thanks,
Adam
