T. Alexander Popiel wrote: >In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Kenneth Pronovici <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >>I maintain libnbio-java, which is a JNI non-blocking socket IO package >>for Java. My current .deb is for upstream version 1.5. The upstream >>maintainer has just released version 2.0, and the only difference from >>version 1.5 is that the package name changed from mdw.java to seda.java. >> >>Does anyone have any opinions on whether I should release version 2.0 as >>an upgrade to the existing package, or whether I should instead release >>a new package, libnbio2-java? >> >>Please CC me on replies... >> >> > >I'd strongly recommend a new package for this one; otherwise, all >the software that relies on the code (in either the old or new >java package) would have to stick specific version info into the >dependencies, which is normally a sub-optimal thing. > >- Alex > Yeap. Do something like libc does. Package it as a new package with version appended to the name and when new version is in the archive, remove the old version. Then hopefully by the time sarge is out, any packages that need to get fixed, will get fixed.
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
