On Thu, 4 Jul 2002, Nicolai P Guba wrote:
> Will they solve the problems with the ejb-spec too? ;)
Nah, need to get rid of sun.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 8 Jul 2002, Nicolai P Guba wrote:
> On Monday 08 July 2002 12:36 am, Adam Heath wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 4 Jul 2002, Nicolai P Guba wrote:
> > > Will they solve the problems with the ejb-spec too? ;)
> >
> > Nah, need to get rid of sun.
>
> Both suck.
On 12 Jul 2002, Sobkowiak Krzysztof wrote:
> I try to install jboss, but jboss-catalina-service depends on
> lib-sax-java. There's not such a packet (i think it should be
> lib-saxon-java). Where's lib-sax-java?
Fetch it from potato. The other developers conspired against me, and had it
removed
On 12 Aug 2002, Grzegorz Prokopski wrote:
> W li¶cie z pon, 12-08-2002, godz. 18:13, Adam Heath pisze:
> > Er, you say free, but are restricting me to only use what is listed in the
> > depends.
So, what about kaffe? What about gcj? Why are you saying that sable is
better th
On 12 Aug 2002, Grzegorz Prokopski wrote:
> Facts that caused that I have choosen this set of tools.
> * kaffe
> It contains it's own JAVA_HOME environment, so it wouldn't make sense
> to just copy it. If you can build with kaffe - then stick with
> it and don't use free-java-sdk. However -
On Sat, 11 Jan 2003, Greg Wilkins wrote:
> + lobby the JBoss project to make any changes that may
> assist you with your packaging (not sure of how successful
> that will be).
Good fucking luck. JBoss upstream has been resistant to any suggestions on
how they package their dependants.
On 10 Jan 2003, Joe Phillips wrote:
> how's very soon?
>
> you can find my packages for 3.0.2 + tomcat at
> http://debian.innovationsw.com/
>
> I have plans for 3.2 next.
I have jboss debs of 2.4(upto 2.4.7). All properly split. Depends on other
java debs in debian(where I can). All non-free a
On 19 Jan 2003, Joe Phillips wrote:
> Yeah...I downloaded your sources at one point. Still need to read
> through your work. My packages are completely my own mess.
>
> > Unfortunately, 3.0 was a radical change, config wise, so I haven't been able
> > to make 3.0 debs yet.
>
> Well I'd be happy
On 10 Jan 2003, Joe Phillips wrote:
> #2 is a bit trickier. tools.jar is needed in some cases, most notably
> servlet/jsp containers need it in order to compile JSP at runtime. My
> JBOSS packages fall into this category. tools.jar is installed
> somewhere under JAVA_HOME, JBOSS needs tools.jar
On Mon, 20 Jan 2003, Greg Wilkins wrote:
> + The setting of JAVA_HOME should be done by an auto search and/or
> a debconf dialog.
Use /etc/defaults/jboss, and if not set, have it look at standard locations
that java debs(from blackdown, maybe /usr/local) contain.
> + The default webconta
On 20 Jan 2003, Joe Phillips wrote:
> I don't know what you mean by the default deployment. jboss-tomcat is
> it's own, optional package. Note that jboss-server-all and
> jboss-server-default depend on jboss-tomcat. The deployment that my
> packages install is straight out of the binary release
> I think we should work to package each individually (eg. javamail) if
> possible and they fall into the above case. The jboss-contrib package
> would shrink over time. The problem with this approach is that future
> versions of jboss-contrib won't be backward compatible with earlier
> versions
> > /var/lib/jboss/
> what's this for? I guess I'll find out when I poke through your
> packages (later this week).
/var/lib/jboss/deploy/, which is where deployments occur. It was g+ws jboss,
and update-jboss(a helper script) had --deploy and --undeploy cmds for users
to run as non-root.
On Fri, 24 Jan 2003, Caoilte O'Connor wrote:
> I don't know a lot about this so I'm not posting a bug, but should tomcat4
> really try and shutdown after postgresql.
>
> It makes it impossible for my webapps to close their db connections cleanly
> and the process ends up getting killed.
>
> What a
The above file is included in sablevm1-dev, libgcj3-dev, and libgcj4-dev.
Kaffe has it at /usr/lib/kaffe/include/jni.h. gcc-snapshot has it at
/usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/include/jni.h.
In discussion with the sablevm maintainer, he maintains that jni.h is a global
file, and is not unique to each vm. H
On Tue, 3 Jun 2003, Michael Koch wrote:
> classpath CVS and gcj-3.3 have some working parts of awt. gcj-3.4 will
> be the first version with a "working" awt implementation.
What widget set will it use?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Cont
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> Description : Extension of the java.lang package
And?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> Description : Ease and speed development and maintenance of validation rules
And?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 28 Jul 2003, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
>
> * Package name: charva
> Version : 1.0.1
> Upstream Author : Rob Pitman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL or Web page : http://www.pitman.co.za/projects/charva/
> * License : LGPL
> Description
On Mon, 28 Jul 2003, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
>
> * Package name: libi18n-java
> Version : 0.1
> Upstream Author : Jean-Hugues de Raigniac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL or Web page : http://jhraigniac.freesurf.fr/i18n-lib/
> * License : ACME
On 11 Aug 2003, Michael R Head wrote:
> I actually use update-alternatives to point to
> /usr/local/lib/j2sdk/bin/java which is a symlink to j2sdk1.4.2 or
> whatever the latest I have installed is.
>
> That said, using the JAVA_HOME variable (if it is set) allow a user on
> the system to easily se
On Thu, 6 Nov 2003, Bear Giles wrote:
> hsqldb: /usr/share/java/hsqldb.jar, documentation, and scripts to
> run the database as a service. I haven't rewritten the stock
> scripts to follow Debian standards yet -- I'm not even sure it's
> practical since the scripts must specify the directory con
On Sat, 8 Nov 2003, Bear Giles wrote:
> The latter is one reason why I believe that ultimately the
> conventional shared library approach is flawed for Java. The
> industry, or at least the part I'm involved with, is moving
> towards self-contained WAR or EAR files that have their own copies
> of
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003, Daniel Bonniot wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> There are currently two release-critical bugs and architecture problems
> that keep kaffe from reentering testing.
> The details are at http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=kaffe
Why didn't you cc the maintainer of kaffe?
--
To U
On Wed, 26 Nov 2003, Rupa Schomaker wrote:
> Mariano García <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I am installing tomcat with apache on Debian (testing). Looking for
> > information I have found that I need mod-jk apache module, and I have
> > found some references about libapache-mod-
On Thu, 4 Mar 2004, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> Ean Schuessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > The only reason that my mail went to -devel was your request to remove
> > Kaffe from seven architectures without consulting me. You made that
> > request to -devel and that request required this respons
kaffe 1.1.4 can now run ofbiz 2.1. I haven't tried a later version of ofbiz.
There are some issues, however.
Startup time under sun 1.4 is 11s. kaffe, 15.2.
Kaffe complains about an invalid bytecode at startup, while sun doesn't.
WARNING Bad bytecode! Illegal exception table entry: start_pc=1
On Sat, 6 Mar 2004, Dalibor Topic wrote:
> Hi Adam,
>
> Adam Heath wrote:
> > kaffe 1.1.4 can now run ofbiz 2.1. I haven't tried a later version of ofbiz.
>
> Thanks for the great news! Could you add the information on how to get
> it to run to the Mov
On Mon, 8 Mar 2004, Andy Zeneski wrote:
> > Of course, ofbiz includes lots of jars in it's tarball and checkout. I
> > haven't checked all of them(well, not any of them), to see how they
> > fit in
> > with the DFSG. Some of the jars included are there for the convience
> > of
> > end-users, and
So, I sent a mail recently to this list, saying I got ofbiz(www.ofbiz.org) to
run on kaffe. This is great news for kaffe.
However, I just realized something very poor. Kaffe is in main. Since
ofbiz(and all the external jars in it's cvs checkout) run on kaffe, it should
be able to go into main a
On Tue, 9 Mar 2004, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > So, I sent a mail recently to this list, saying I got ofbiz(www.ofbiz.org) to
> > run on kaffe. This is great news for kaffe.
> >
> > However, I just realized something
On Tue, 9 Mar 2004, Adam Heath wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Mar 2004, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
>
> > Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > So, I sent a mail recently to this list, saying I got ofbiz(www.ofbiz.org) to
> > > run on kaffe. This is great n
On Wed, 10 Mar 2004, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > These are the jars I need to have packaged still.
> > Slightly smaller list, as I found some replacements in debian already.
>
> Re-ordered:
>
> 1° Maybe already in
On Wed, 10 Mar 2004, elijah wright wrote:
>
> i'm pretty sure someone already built jboss packages - i seem to have an
> apt-get source for them already, at least
>
> elijah
That was me, but was based on 2.4. 3.0 changed completely around, and I never
got around to it.
Plus, we have stopped
On 10 Mar 2004, Joe Phillips wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-03-10 at 11:39, elijah wright wrote:
> >
> > i'm pretty sure someone already built jboss packages - i seem to have an
> > apt-get source for them already, at least
>
> I packaged an old version of jboss (3.0.2 or something)[1] and had
> intent
On Wed, 10 Mar 2004, Dalibor Topic wrote:
> I don't know about the rest from the top of my head. I'm checking in
> some RMI improvements now, and then we'll give JBoss a beating. The
> developement in the last few days has been quite intensive wrt to
> getting XScale, PowerPC-no-fpu, and MIPS to r
I've reduced the list, to those that implement java extensions.
jdbc2_0-stdext and jta appear to be in kaffe in some form or another.
> components/minerva/lib/jdbc2_0-stdext.jar
javax.sql.*
> components/minerva/lib/jta_1.0.1.jar
javax.transaction.*
> components/minerva/lib/ots-jts_1.0.jar
o
On Wed, 10 Mar 2004, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Wed, 10 Mar 2004, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> >
> >> Would be cool to have JBoss in Debian ;-)
> >
> > Don't you mean ofbiz(altho, jboss would be nice too,
On Tue, 9 Mar 2004, Adam Heath wrote:
> components/content/lib/velocity-dep-1.3.jar
This is part of a subproject of velocity, velocity-tools.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 31 Mar 2004, Karl Trygve Kalleberg wrote:
> (i) distribute the Softwarre complete and
>unmodified and only bundled as part of your
>Programs,
>
> - I think we pass this one, except that we change the paths where the
> packages are installed.
Nope. Developer A distributes an scs
On Mon, 5 Apr 2004, Charles Fry wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I sent this to debian-mentors with no response yet, and started thinking
> maybe I should send it to debian-java instead. In any case:
>
> I have started work on packaging the Bouncy Castle Crypto libraries
> for Java (bug #234048). I think I have m
On Mon, 6 Sep 1999, Seth R Arnold wrote:
> Stephane, it might be best to file the bugreports upstream.. the problems in
> kaffe also apply to redhat, suse, and probably non-linux distributions too.
>
> On Mon, Sep 06, 1999 at 03:58:55PM +0200, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> >
On Monday 6 September 1999, at 20 h 49, the keyboard of "Ean R . Schuessler"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > have perhaps not been optimally responsive I believe that I have kept my
> > kaffe installs fairly current.
>
> Ean, you will not like what I'll write. If you prefer to stay cool, you m
On Tue, 7 Sep 1999, Steve Robbins wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Sep 1999, Adam Heath wrote:
>
> >
> > Debian is about communication. Email. Irc. Phone. Conferences.
> > Anything.
> > But not blind work. This is a community project, not just a bunch of
> > i
On Tue, 14 Sep 1999, Seth R Arnold wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 14, 1999 at 11:24:35PM -0500, Ean R . Schuessler wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 14, 1999 at 11:11:43PM -0300, Julio wrote:
> > > Can a virtual package have a version (to be set by a 'real' package that
> > > implements it)? If so, it'd be useful to
++ UL P+ L !E W+ M o+ K- W--- !O M- !V PS--
PE++ Y+ PGP++ t* 5++ X+ tv b+ D++ G e h*! !r z?
-END GEEK CODE BLOCK-
BEGIN PGP INFO
Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Finger Print | KeyID
67 01 42 93 CA 37 FB 1E63 C9 80 1D 08 CF 84 0A | DE656B05 PGP
AD46 C888 F587 F8
PE++ Y+ PGP++ t* 5++ X+ tv b+ D++ G e h*! !r z?
-END GEEK CODE BLOCK-
BEGIN PGP INFO
Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Finger Print | KeyID
67 01 42 93 CA 37 FB 1E63 C9 80 1D 08 CF 84 0A | DE656B05 PGP
AD46 C888 F587 F8A3 A6DA 3261 8A2C 7DC2 8BD4 A489 | 8BD4A489 GPG
-END PGP INFO-
with kaffe. The normal kaffe package won't
provide itself(it does, but let's not get into dpkg internals too much), but
it SHOULD conflict with itself.
BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK
Version: 3.12
GCS d- s: a-- c+++ UL P+ L !E W+ M o+ K- W--- !O M- !V PS--
PE++ Y+ PGP++
On Tue, 3 Apr 2001, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> I really hope that someone will raise to maintain the java policy
> (Debian really needs one) and that free Java will become one day a
> reality.
I am willing to take this over(java-policy).
On Thu, 12 Apr 2001, Joe Emenaker wrote:
> > Just to complicate the situation
> >
> > Any script that builds a PATHS,CLASSPATH, must also consider stripping
> > conflicts from them.
>
> Well, each JVM on the system could have a script that builds the classpath
> that it needs. That would be th
Sorry for the large cc, but it is about time that debian had a unified policy
on these package names.
On Sat, 15 Sep 2001, Ben Burton wrote:
>
> Okay. Note that java policy states that "Libraries packages must be named
> lib-XXX-java."
I think the java policy is wrong. Why should java be any
On Sat, 15 Sep 2001, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 04:23:47PM -0500, Ben Burton wrote:
> >
> > Seeing as java policy is getting a work through right now, I personally
> > have no problems with removing /usr/share/java/repository in favour of
> > versioned jars.
> >
> > Does anyone
On Mon, 17 Sep 2001, Per Bothner wrote:
> Stefan Gybas wrote:
>
> > Basically yes, but IMHO this should be the decision of the local admin
> > and not of the package maintainer. How could he know ig his package
> > contains "standard" jars? This means that no package should automatically
> > put j
On Wed, 19 Sep 2001, Egon Willighagen wrote:
> On Tuesday 18 September 2001 14:44, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> > Like, CLASSPATH=$CLASSPATH:$INTERNALCLASSPATH before running
> > the real jvm.
>
> I'm not really in favor of a system wide classpath; i prefer the current
> system where /usr/bin/pr
On Sat, 22 Sep 2001, michele bianchi wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Sep 2001, Mitchell wrote:
>
> > Has anyone packaged jboss and it's associated modules from (www.jboss.org)
> > for debian?
> >
> > It isn't in the main distrib, would there be any reason for this appart
> > from the fact that no one has pa
On Wed, 31 Oct 2001, Bang, Steinar wrote:
> I'm running a woody system with tomcat 3.2 working
> with apache 1.3.19 right now.
>
> However, I would like to try out 3.3 without messing
> too much with manual configuration, so my question is:
> does anyone know if there are unofficial 3.3 packages
>
Sorry for the delayed reply, but we all know how life and time come and go.
On Tue, 18 Sep 2001, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> Package naming:
> ---
>
> * Java programs should be named as any ordinary debian packages.
> * Libraries must (?) have the name
> lib[version]-java (where the
ugh to choose another name. On that doesn't have a varient.
BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK
Version: 3.12
GCS d- s: a-- c+++ UL P+ L !E W+ M o+ K- W--- !O M- !V PS--
PE++ Y+ PGP++ t* 5++ X+ tv b+ D++ G e h*! !r z?
-END GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
----BEGIN PGP INFO
Adam Heath <[EMA
pped it at the time, as I was busy. I'll look
at it soon.
BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK
Version: 3.12
GCS d- s: a-- c+++ UL P+ L !E W+ M o+ K- W--- !O M- !V PS--
PE++ Y+ PGP++ t* 5++ X+ tv b+ D++ G e h*! !r z?
-END GEEK CODE BLOCK-
BEGIN PGP INFO
Adam Heat
On 5 Nov 2001, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote:
> The more serious issue, though, is: autobuilders will build jikes
> against the libstdc++3 version in unstable, and the resulting binary
> will depend on it. That is it will depend on libstdc++3 (>= 1:3.0.2-1)
> on mips, libstdc++3 (>= 1:3.0.2-2) on alpha,
I have noticed that almost ALL packages include external .jars in their
internal lib directories. This *MUST* stop. Yesterday. Last year.
Lots of 'external' jars are not redistributable. You can't even have them in
the source package.
I will be filing bugs on all java packages this weekend th
On 8 Nov 2001, Kevin A. Burton wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I have noticed that almost ALL packages include external .jars in their
> > internal lib directories. This *MUST* stop. Yeste
On 9 Nov 2001, Kevin A. Burton wrote:
> And what if foo requires libbar-1.1.3 which is incompatible with the fictional
> libbar-1.1.0 that jboss requires?
>
> How do you install both on the same system... Do you compute the CLASSPATH
> in a
> different manner for each application?
You treat it
On Thu, 8 Nov 2001, Adam Heath wrote:
> I have noticed that almost ALL packages include external .jars in their
> internal lib directories. This *MUST* stop. Yesterday. Last year.
>
> Lots of 'external' jars are not redistributable. You can't even have them in
>
Package: libgcj2
On Mon, 12 Nov 2001, Per Bothner wrote:
> Robert Bihlmeyer wrote:
>
> >apt-get install java-virtual-machine
> >
> >This will list all available packages providing a JVM.
> >
> I trust gcj/libgcj is so listed? (I'm not running Debian on my
> own machines so I can't check easily.)
On Tue, 13 Nov 2001, Max Kellermann wrote:
> On 0, Per Bothner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The most glaring missing feature in gcj is AWT. If you're
> > running server-style or other non-GUI application, I suggest
> > you try it. See htpp://gcc.gnu.org/java/
>
>
> Has anybody tried running
On Tue, 13 Nov 2001, Max Kellermann wrote:
> Is it planned to support natively compiled .JAR classes which can be loaded
> using custom (pure Java) ClassLoader instances?
gcj supports loading precompiled .class files.
gcj supports loading precompiled .jar(and all other variant) files.
gcj suppor
On Tue, 20 Nov 2001, Per Bothner wrote:
> Ben Burton wrote:
>
> >>Well, the gcj runtimes (libgcj or whatever the package name is)
> >>should be fixed to provide java-runtime.
> >>
> >
> >Oh.. I had figured it was a deliberate decision on behalf of the gcc
> >maintainers not to provide java-runtime
On 20 Nov 2001, Tom Tromey wrote:
> > "Ben" == Ben Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> Well, the gcj runtimes (libgcj or whatever the package name is)
> >> should be fixed to provide java-runtime.
>
> Ben> Oh.. I had figured it was a deliberate decision on behalf of the
> Ben> gcc mainta
On Wed, 21 Nov 2001, Per Bothner wrote:
> Adam Heath wrote:
>
> >I have found that, in theory, gcj and gij are compatible, in reality they are
> >not. To be compatable, they *MUST* take *EXACTLY* the same arguments as
> >other
> >standard $(JAVA) and $(JAVAC).
On Thu, 29 Nov 2001, Stefan Gybas wrote:
> Fine, and the Debian package uses the same user as Apache (default:
> www-data), also for security reasons :)
I consider that a bug, and should probably file one. tomcat should not run as
the same user as apache, for security reasons.
according to the Debian
> Free Software Guideliness -- non-free, of course. So if you want to include
> some of them into a Debian package this package must go to the non-free
> section. This is what Adam Heath plans to do with his JBoss package but I
> don't want to maintain a packa
On Wed, 5 Dec 2001, Kenneth Pronovici wrote:
> Hello -
>
> I just found a few-month-old debian-java discussion about JBoss involving the
> three of you. I was wondering whether you've managed to get a JBoss package
> created and working? I'd be looking for a binary package for testing, but a
> s
On 5 Dec 2001, Stephen Zander wrote:
> >>>>> "Adam" == Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Adam> I've filed an ITP, and will probably be uploading in 2
> Adam> weeks, at the most. I don't want to release the debs to the
>
Can I do the above? It's just so crappily wrong to have this, it should have
never existed, the person(s) who thought it up should be flambayed(sp).
I WANT to remove ALL traces of this from ALL packages, NOW. It makes building
oh so difficult.
On Fri, 4 Jan 2002, Colin Watson wrote:
> OK. I now see why it applies to libraries, but don't see why it's a
> benefit for standalone programs (where multiple versions can't be
> installed via dpkg simultaneously anyway, and where the .jars aren't
> intended for external use). I suppose it's a li
On Tue, 5 Feb 2002, Rick Lutowski wrote:
> Is there any way to get this spam trash out of our e-mail list?
Global Thermonuclear War.
No more spam.
On Fri, 8 Feb 2002, Stefan Gybas wrote:
> Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
>
> > Is it possible to make kind of installer packages for these
> > dependencies? Like the realplayer package or else.
>
>
> Yes, sure it is. The ftp admins might even allow a real package for
> non-free but nobody has vo
On Tue, 12 Feb 2002, Stefan Gybas wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I have created an experimental package of Tomcat 4.0.2 and put it
> at http://people.debian.org/~sgybas/tomcat4/
OOH!
Now I have something to build jboss against.
I need a way to make use of the tomcat4 code base, but NOT have it start up.
Coul
On Tue, 12 Feb 2002, Stefan Gybas wrote:
> Adam Heath wrote:
>
> > I need a way to make use of the tomcat4 code base, but NOT have it start up.
> > Could the init script be put into a separate package, so
> > jboss-catalina-service can conflict with it?
>
> Whic
On Tue, 12 Feb 2002, Adam Heath wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Feb 2002, Stefan Gybas wrote:
>
> > Adam Heath wrote:
> >
> > > I need a way to make use of the tomcat4 code base, but NOT have it start
> > > up.
> > > Could the init script be put into a separate
On Tue, 12 Feb 2002, Adam Heath wrote:
> [16:59:32,353,ConfigurationService] Could not create MBean
> Catalina:name=Catalina(org.apache.catalina.startup.EmbeddedManager)
> java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: org.apache.catalina.startup.EmbeddedManager
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/
On Wed, 13 Feb 2002, Stefan Gybas wrote:
> Adam Heath wrote:
>
> > EmbeddedManager depends on jmxri.jar.
>
> Right, from Catalina's build.xml:
>
> unless="compile.jmx"/>
> unless="compile.jmx"/>
>
On Wed, 13 Feb 2002, Stefan Gybas wrote:
> Who wants to package openjmx? If nobody sends an ITP within the next
> 24 hours, I'll do it. Packaging looks very simple: Just call Ant.
I'll do it. I need it for jboss as well.
I should have packages done by no later than this weekend, as I juggle it
On Wed, 13 Feb 2002, Stefan Gybas wrote:
> Adam Heath wrote:
>
> > I should have packages done by no later than this weekend, as I juggle it in
> > with work. Can you hold off uploading tomcat4 until at least then?
>
> Sure, I'll need some more test versions anyw
On Wed, 13 Feb 2002, Stefan Gybas wrote:
> Stefan Gybas wrote:
>
> > I'm just trying to figure out why Tomcat does not work with a security
> > manager on JDK 1.3 but works fine on JDK 1.4. Has anyone experience with
> > this?
>
> I found the problem: It seems that JDK 1.3 does follow symlinks wh
On Tue, 12 Feb 2002, Adam Heath wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Feb 2002, Stefan Gybas wrote:
>
> > Who wants to package openjmx? If nobody sends an ITP within the next
> > 24 hours, I'll do it. Packaging looks very simple: Just call Ant.
>
> I'll do it. I need it for jbo
On Tue, 19 Mar 2002, Nicolas SABOURET wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I intend to package arkanae, a 3D role playing game written in Java and
> OpenGL. It requires GL4Java, an OpenGL binding for Java (see
> http://www.jausoft.com/gl4java.html).
> Sadly, both programs (arkanae and gl4java) require jdk >= 1.2.
> O
On Sat, 30 Mar 2002, Brett Sealey wrote:
> For a while there, Adam Heath was working on JBoss debs, not sure how far
> he got.
Still am. Got invovled working on a website at work.
We do use the debs on our own sites, tho.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subj
On 7 May 2002, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> Anyway time for a new dump :
> * changed test "rpmmode=true" to "standalone=false" since
> jpackage rpms aim at a correct & standard setup, if someone
> (like debian) thinks we abuse a standard we should fix the our
> rp
On 9 May 2002, Grzegorz Prokopski wrote:
> If no - then the dependencies of ArgoUML won't be fulfiled in Debian.
> Will it prevent the package from entering contrib section?
Packages on contrib are free, but depend on non-free packages, either in
contrib, or outside of debian.
> I know that JBos
On 12 May 2002, Nic Ferrier wrote:
> 2.5. Main, contrib or non-free
>
>
>
> If your binary package can run only with non-free virtual machines
> (the only free Java virtual machine seems to be kaffe - and the one
> included in libgcj), it cannot go to main. If your package itself is
>
On 12 May 2002, Jim Pick wrote:
> Also, as the upstream kaffe maintainer, I'd really like it if for each
> package that was stuck in contrib because kaffe can't run it (eg.
> unimplemented APIs, etc), there was a "wishlist" bug filed against kaffe
> stating how it fails. I suppose that goes for t
On Sun, 12 May 2002, Egon Willighagen wrote:
> And the same for gcj? Is there an easy way to port a Ant based compilation
> to some Makefile like stuff for compiling with gcj? Is there a good tutorial
> on it somewhere?
I've got a makefile based build system, that supports jdk-like jvms(kaffe,
su
On Sun, 12 May 2002, Andrew Pimlott wrote:
> Ok, then it is just a question of naming. Say my foo library can be
> compiled to .class files and GCJ .so files. One option is to
> package both in libfoo-java, which would be architecture specific.
> But if you want to split them into an architectur
On 12 May 2002, Jim Pick wrote:
> Sounds like Debian could use the same solution for gcj that Debian uses
> for emacs -> just distribute the .java files and do the ahead-of-time
> compilation (.java to .so) at install time. Is this automatic enough
> under gcj so that this could that work?
Let m
On Sun, 12 May 2002, Per Bothner wrote:
> Also, what happens if you install a Java package, and then install
> gcj later? Shuld that so the compilation to .so when you install
> gcj?
Each emacs extension packages places hooks into a site-wide dir. Then, all
the emacsen are processed over each f
I am proud to announce that I have finally finished(well, close enough,
anyways) the debs of JBoss(www.jboss.org). You can fetch them by adding the
appropriate line(1) to /etc/apt/sources.list.
These debs are modular, and broken up into semi-logic parts. To install
jboss, with catalina(tomcat4)
On Sat, 29 Jun 2002, Greg Wilkins wrote:
>
> Adam,
>
> Sounds like great work.
>
> I'm the maintainer/developer of Jetty, a jboss developer and a debian user
> so I'm keen to help create a debian package for Jetty to fit in with your
> JBoss work.
>
> But I know zip about making debian packages, s
On 28 Jun 2002, Jim Pick wrote:
> Cool. Looks like a lot of work. :-)
>
> I'll have to give 'em a try (and eventually, with Kaffe).
jboss uses java.lang.reflect.Proxy(or whatever it is). It also uses exit
finaliziers.
Personally, I haven't tried it with kaffe, but I would bet it wouldn't work
1 - 100 of 179 matches
Mail list logo
