On Sat, 15 Sep 2001, Ola Lundqvist wrote: > On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 04:23:47PM -0500, Ben Burton wrote: > > > > Seeing as java policy is getting a work through right now, I personally > > have no problems with removing /usr/share/java/repository in favour of > > versioned jars. > > > > Does anyone have reasons why /usr/share/java/repository should remain? > > No do do not like that repository. Can we have some consensus about this? > > Should I remove it from the policy? > > > > > Currently the java libraries I package are in the form of: > > > > /usr/share/java/foo-version.jar > > /usr/share/java/foo.jar -> foo-version.jar > > This is probably the best one. Should I add that to the repository?
use alternatives.
