Confused about the Glassfish packages

2008-09-09 Thread David Goodenough
I am confused about the Glassfish packages on Debian. What are they intended for? They do not seem to install a complete running version of Glassfish (there is no /etc/init.d script for a start) so I assume that they are intended just to deliver JARs needed for development. So this begs two qu

Re: Confused about the Glassfish packages

2008-09-09 Thread Vincent Fourmond
Hello, On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 1:17 PM, David Goodenough <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am confused about the Glassfish packages on Debian. What are they > intended for? They do not seem to install a complete running version > of Glassfish (there is no /etc/init.d script for a start) so I assum

Re: Confused about the Glassfish packages

2008-09-09 Thread David Goodenough
On Tuesday 09 September 2008, Vincent Fourmond wrote: > Hello, > > On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 1:17 PM, David Goodenough > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I am confused about the Glassfish packages on Debian. What are they > > intended for? They do not seem to install a complete running version > >

Re: Confused about the Glassfish packages

2008-09-09 Thread Kumar Appaiah
On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 01:48:10PM +0100, David Goodenough wrote: > Well not really. If all they are intended to be is a source of JARs for > development purposes than thats fine (but it would be useful to be told). > > Its only if they are intended to be all of glassfish that there is a bug. I

Re: Confused about the Glassfish packages

2008-09-09 Thread Matthew Johnson
On Tue Sep 09 13:48, David Goodenough wrote: > Well not really. If all they are intended to be is a source of JARs for > development purposes than thats fine (but it would be useful to be told). It's a bug that you aren't told (-: I'd say either there's a wishlist or normal bug about the descr

Re: Confused about the Glassfish packages

2008-09-09 Thread David Goodenough
On Tuesday 09 September 2008, Matthew Johnson wrote: > On Tue Sep 09 13:48, David Goodenough wrote: > > Well not really. If all they are intended to be is a source of JARs for > > development purposes than thats fine (but it would be useful to be told). > > It's a bug that you aren't told (-: > >

Re: Confused about the Glassfish packages

2008-09-09 Thread Dalibor Topic
Kumar Appaiah wrote: > On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 01:48:10PM +0100, David Goodenough wrote: > >> Well not really. If all they are intended to be is a source of JARs for >> development purposes than thats fine (but it would be useful to be told). >> >> Its only if they are intended to be all of gl

java jfractionlab debian package

2008-09-09 Thread Xavier Oswald
Hi, Im asking here if someone is interested in packaging jfractionlab[1] for debian. Im to busy right now to take another package and maintain it in a good way. Since it is related to education and as it is commonly used with debian-edu, it would be nice if someone could do the debian package.

Re: gcjwebplugin runs untrusted code without sandbox

2008-09-09 Thread peter green
I can't believe you're actually arguing that the solution against blindly trusting a website is blindly trusting a binary blob. I would rather use a secure free plugin than a secure non-free plugin, but apparently that doesn't exist. Since the choice is between a secure non-free plugin and an i

Re: java jfractionlab debian package

2008-09-09 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 09:46:48PM +0200, Xavier Oswald wrote: >Im asking here if someone is interested in packaging jfractionlab[1] >for debian. > >Im to busy right now to take another package and maintain it in a good >way. > >Since it is related t