On Tue Sep 09 13:48, David Goodenough wrote: > Well not really. If all they are intended to be is a source of JARs for > development purposes than thats fine (but it would be useful to be told).
It's a bug that you aren't told (-: I'd say either there's a wishlist or normal bug about the description and documentation, or there's an important, severe or grave bug about the functionality. In either case there's a bug though (-: > For this reason I thought that a discussion on the list was the best starting > point. > That's still reasonable. Sadly I can't answer the original question though (-: Matt -- Matthew Johnson
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
