Re: libapache2-mod-jk2 configuration

2005-06-28 Thread Alan Chandler
On Monday 27 June 2005 09:33, Arnaud Vandyck wrote: > Thu, 23 Jun 2005 21:12:46 +0100, > > Alan Chandler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thursday 23 June 2005 20:17, Mark Lowe wrote: > >> I'd stay away from jk2 is deprecated in favour of maintaining the > >> original mod_jk. The configuration for

Re: libapache2-mod-jk2 configuration

2005-06-27 Thread Wolfgang Baer
Arnaud Vandyck wrote: > Thu, 23 Jun 2005 21:12:46 +0100, > Alan Chandler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>On Thursday 23 June 2005 20:17, Mark Lowe wrote: >> >>>I'd stay away from jk2 is deprecated in favour of maintaining the >>>original mod_jk. The configuration for jk2 meant more hoop-jumpin

Re: libapache2-mod-jk2 configuration

2005-06-27 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
Thu, 23 Jun 2005 21:12:46 +0100, Alan Chandler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thursday 23 June 2005 20:17, Mark Lowe wrote: >> I'd stay away from jk2 is deprecated in favour of maintaining the >> original mod_jk. The configuration for jk2 meant more hoop-jumping >> than with jk and thus is fell

Re: libapache2-mod-jk2 configuration -- Do NOT do that!

2005-06-23 Thread Alan Chandler
Forgot to copy the reply to this list. On Friday 24 June 2005 07:00, Alan Chandler wrote: > On Friday 24 June 2005 01:12, Paul D. Bain wrote: > > I am not an expert on network security, but, IIRC, putting a web server > > on the same physical box as a firewall is an incredibly _bad_ idea, at >

Re: libapache2-mod-jk2 configuration -- Do NOT do that!

2005-06-23 Thread Paul D. Bain
Alan Chandler wrote: I am trying to add tomcat4 into my existing apache2 system so that I can experiment with java (in the form of servlets and jsp). Although in reality I only have a single computer, for learning purposes I want to similate the situation where I have potentially split web and

Re: libapache2-mod-jk2 configuration

2005-06-23 Thread Alan Chandler
On Thursday 23 June 2005 22:11, Mark Lowe wrote: > If you're up for compliling jk and for that matter apache then there's > no problem using apache2 and jk.. But you'd lose the benefit of the > package management that is a big plus with debian.. You misunderstand me - the link you gave below build

Re: libapache2-mod-jk2 configuration

2005-06-23 Thread Alan Chandler
On Thursday 23 June 2005 20:17, Mark Lowe wrote: > I'd stay away from jk2 is deprecated in favour of maintaining the > original mod_jk. The configuration for jk2 meant more hoop-jumping > than with jk and thus is fell out of favour.. Yes I know - thats why I was puzzled that even unstable does not

Re: libapache2-mod-jk2 configuration

2005-06-23 Thread Ugo Bellavance
Alan Chandler wrote: > I am trying to add tomcat4 into my existing apache2 system so that I can > experiment with java (in the form of servlets and jsp). > > Although in reality I only have a single computer, for learning purposes I > want to similate the situation where I have potentially split

libapache2-mod-jk2 configuration

2005-06-23 Thread Alan Chandler
I am trying to add tomcat4 into my existing apache2 system so that I can experiment with java (in the form of servlets and jsp). Although in reality I only have a single computer, for learning purposes I want to similate the situation where I have potentially split web and application servers.