Arnaud Vandyck wrote: > Thu, 23 Jun 2005 21:12:46 +0100, > Alan Chandler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>On Thursday 23 June 2005 20:17, Mark Lowe wrote: >> >>>I'd stay away from jk2 is deprecated in favour of maintaining the >>>original mod_jk. The configuration for jk2 meant more hoop-jumping >>>than with jk and thus is fell out of favour.. >> >>Yes I know - thats why I was puzzled that even unstable does not have an >>libapache2-mod-jk >
Hi Arnaud, > > I'm sorry I'm not able to work for Debian ATM: > http://www.edev.be/blog/index.php/archives/2005/06/27/moving-d-6/ Well, things have to be done if you buy a house :-) > But I'm working (when I have some time) on tomcat5 *and* its connectors > (aka jk2). Arnaud if you can commit your current work to our CVS I could work a bit on tomcat5 - however currently its not uptodate (at least compared to the experimental tomcat5 version) I am working on libapache-mod-jk for both apache versions. I am almost finished but I need to test it .... Wolfgang -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
