On Monday 27 June 2005 09:33, Arnaud Vandyck wrote: > Thu, 23 Jun 2005 21:12:46 +0100, > > Alan Chandler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thursday 23 June 2005 20:17, Mark Lowe wrote: > >> I'd stay away from jk2 is deprecated in favour of maintaining the > >> original mod_jk. The configuration for jk2 meant more hoop-jumping > >> than with jk and thus is fell out of favour.. > > > > Yes I know - thats why I was puzzled that even unstable does not have an > > libapache2-mod-jk > > I'm sorry I'm not able to work for Debian ATM: > http://www.edev.be/blog/index.php/archives/2005/06/27/moving-d-6/
No need to be sorry. I am just grateful for all the work everyone has already done. I was just puzzled as to the choices - but now I understand its a time to do things issue rather than a choice thing. -- Alan Chandler http://www.chandlerfamily.org.uk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
