On 04/28/2015 12:03 PM, Jakub Adam wrote:
> Dear Java packagers,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for package "eclipse-cdt".
>
> * Package name: eclipse-cdt
>Version : 8.6.0-1
Uploaded - thank you for the update.
Cheers,
tony
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signatu
On Fri, Oct 03, 2014 at 03:19:17PM +0200, Jakub Adam wrote:
> Dear Java packagers,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for package "eclipse-cdt".
Uploaded.
--
Miguel Landaeta, nomadium at debian.org
secure email with PGP 0x6E608B637D8967E9 available at http://miguel.cc/key.
"Faith means not wanting
On Fri, Oct 03, 2014 at 03:19:17PM +0200, Jakub Adam wrote:
> Dear Java packagers,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for package "eclipse-cdt".
>
I'll take care of it.
--
Miguel Landaeta, nomadium at debian.org
secure email with PGP 0x6E608B637D8967E9 available at http://miguel.cc/key.
"Faith mea
On 07/27/2014 12:17 PM, Jakub Adam wrote:
> Hi Tony,
>
> On 07/26/2014 08:00 PM, tony mancill wrote:
>> the change to set the javac target to 1.7. Is it necessary?
>
> yes, the package won't build without that.
>
>> Since, eclipse-cdt is Arch: all, the package may fail on any
>> architectures th
Hi Tony,
On 07/26/2014 08:00 PM, tony mancill wrote:
the change to set the javac target to 1.7. Is it necessary?
yes, the package won't build without that.
Since, eclipse-cdt is Arch: all, the package may fail on any
architectures that pull in a default-jdk that isn't openjdk-7 (see [1]).
On 07/26/2014 03:53 AM, Jakub Adam wrote:
> Dear Java packagers,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for package "eclipse-cdt".
>
> * Package name: eclipse-cdt
>Version : 8.4.0-1
>Upstream Author : Eclipse CDT project
> * URL : http://eclipse.org/cdt/
> * License
On 06/26/2014 03:47 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I fixed the eclipse-cdt package to build with Java 8 and I'm looking for
> a sponsor to upload it. This is a trivial update, a Ant task was
> simply missing the source/target attributes.
>
> http://mentors.debian.net/package/eclipse-cdt
On 05/12/2014 10:02 AM, Jakub Adam wrote:
> Dear Java packagers,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for package "eclipse-cdt".
>
> * Package name: eclipse-cdt
>Version : 8.3.0-2
Uploaded - thanks for the fix.
tony
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 03/01/2014 05:25 AM, Jakub Adam wrote:
> Dear Java packagers,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for package "eclipse-cdt".
Uploaded.
Cheers,
tony
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 10/03/2013 12:12 PM, Jakub Adam wrote:
> Dear Java packagers,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for package "eclipse-cdt".
>
> * Package name: eclipse-cdt
>Version : 8.2.1-1
>Upstream Author : Eclipse CDT project
> * URL : http://eclipse.org/cdt/
> * License
On 08/27/2013 11:28 AM, Jakub Adam wrote:
> Dear Java packagers,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for package "eclipse-cdt".
>
> * Package name: eclipse-cdt
>Version : 8.2.0-2
>Upstream Author : Eclipse CDT project
> * URL : http://eclipse.org/cdt/
> * License
On 07/11/2013 10:57 PM, Jakub Adam wrote:
> Dear Java packagers,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for package "eclipse-cdt".
>
> * Package name: eclipse-cdt
>Version : 8.2.0-1
>Upstream Author : Eclipse CDT project
> * URL : http://eclipse.org/cdt/
> * License
On 03/16/2013 09:44 AM, Jakub Adam wrote:
> Hi Niels,
>
> On 16.3.2013 10:53, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> is "cca" a typo of "ca." (i.e. "circa") or something else?
>
> Yes, it was meant to mean "circa". The abbreviation "cca." is also
> possible in English[1],
> but looks like it's not so common as
Hi Niels,
On 16.3.2013 10:53, Niels Thykier wrote:
is "cca" a typo of "ca." (i.e. "circa") or something else?
Yes, it was meant to mean "circa". The abbreviation "cca." is also possible in
English[1],
but looks like it's not so common as I thought (and I missed the dot at the
end).
Replaced
On 2013-03-15 19:20, Jakub Adam wrote:
> Dear java packagers,
>
> [...]
>
> Package source can be accessed at pkg-java git repository:
>
> http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-java/eclipse-cdt.git
>
> This is a new bugfixing release from upstream, not suitable for Wheezy,
> so please upload into experi
On 12/20/2012 04:48 AM, Jakub Adam wrote:
> Dear java packagers,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for package "eclipse-cdt".
>
> * Package name: eclipse-cdt
>Version : 8.1.1-1
>Upstream Author : Eclipse CDT project
> * URL : http://eclipse.org/cdt/
> * License
On 2012-06-24 12:38, Jakub Adam wrote:
> Dear java packagers,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for package "eclipse-cdt-pkg-config".
>
> [...]
>
>
> Package source can be accessed at pkg-java git repository:
>
> http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-java/eclipse-cdt-pkg-config.git
>
> I would be glad i
On 2012-03-11 23:36, Jakub Adam wrote:
> Hi Niels,
>
>> I see this have (apparently) been left unanswered for a while. Is this
>> RFS still relevant and if so, how do did you obtain a tarball for it?
>> Upstream does not appear to have tarballs nor svn tags. The best I
>> could find was their bi
Hi Niels,
I see this have (apparently) been left unanswered for a while. Is this
RFS still relevant and if so, how do did you obtain a tarball for it?
Upstream does not appear to have tarballs nor svn tags. The best I
could find was their binary releases at [1], which suggests there are
"multi
On 2011-11-07 18:39, Jakub Adam wrote:
> Dear java packagers,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for package "eclipse-cdt-pkg-config".
>
> * Package name: eclipse-cdt-pkg-config
>Version : 0.5.3-1
>Upstream Author : Petri Tuononen
> * URL :
> http://code.google.com/p
On 2012-02-02 22:41, Jakub Adam wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> This license in itself is discriminating against users, so it has to go
>> in non-free unless we can obtain it under a better license.
>
> for completeness I paste here a link to analysis I got from debian-legal
> [1]
> (nothing much new there). I
On 02/29/2012 11:41 AM, Jakub Adam wrote:
> Dear java packagers,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for package "eclipse-cdt".
Uploaded.
Cheers,
tony
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi,
This license in itself is discriminating against users, so it has to go
in non-free unless we can obtain it under a better license.
for completeness I paste here a link to analysis I got from debian-legal [1]
(nothing much new there). I will try to contact upstream and clarify the
license
On 2012-01-17 22:05, Jakub Adam wrote:
> Hi Niels,
>
>> [...]
>
> Regards,
>
> Jakub
>
>
Hi Jakub,
I checked the license notice in qswt/shared/shared_global_p.h of
eclipse-cdt-qa[1] and found:
"""
/
**
** Copyright
Hi Niels,
I am a bit concerned with the patches here. Particularly
"custom-build.patch" contains a lot of code changes and its
description/subject ("custom-build") is completely unhelpful.
I split that patch into smaller chunks and added some descriptions, see git.
The description of "disab
On 2012-01-12 23:26, Jakub Adam wrote:
> Dear java packagers,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for package "eclipse-cdt-qt".
>
> * Package name: eclipse-cdt-qt
>Version : 1.6.1-1
>Upstream Author : Nokia
> * URL : http://qt.nokia.com/products/eclipse-integration/
>
On 2011-11-06 12:45, Jakub Adam wrote:
> Hi Niels,
>
>> If the JNI libs are the only architecture dependent stuff, we should
>> probably split the package (i.e. eclipse-cdt-jni and eclipse-cdt or so).
>> That will also save the "mkdir/mv/rm"-code since javahelper would then
>> install all the pl
Hi Niels,
If the JNI libs are the only architecture dependent stuff, we should
probably split the package (i.e. eclipse-cdt-jni and eclipse-cdt or so).
That will also save the "mkdir/mv/rm"-code since javahelper would then
install all the plugins into usr/share instead of usr/lib.
I split th
On 2011-10-30 21:51, Jakub Adam wrote:
> Dear java packagers,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for package "eclipse-cdt".
>
> * Package name: eclipse-cdt
>Version : 8.0.1-1
>Upstream Author : Eclipse CDT project
> * URL : http://eclipse.org/cdt/
> * License
Uploaded.
Cheers,
Tony
On 10/08/2010 02:10 AM, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Hi
>
> Benjamin Drung and I have prepared a new version of eclipse-cdt.
>
> eclipse-cdt (6.0.2-1) unstable; urgency=low
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Am Freitag, den 08.10.2010, 11:10 +0200 schrieb Niels Thykier:
> Hi
>
> Benjamin Drung and I have prepared a new version of eclipse-cdt.
>
> eclipse-cdt (6.0.2-1) unstable; urgency=low
>
> * New upstream release.
> - eclipse-cdt no longer quits when looking up a declaration.
> (Closes:
31 matches
Mail list logo
