Hi Niels,
I see this have (apparently) been left unanswered for a while. Is this
RFS still relevant and if so, how do did you obtain a tarball for it?
Upstream does not appear to have tarballs nor svn tags. The best I
could find was their binary releases at [1], which suggests there are
"multiple 0.5.3" versions.
If you just pulled trunk, I think it is best to go back to the
"+svn$rev" notation.
yes, this RFS is still relevant. For the source tarball I determined the
right svn revision by comparing the commit date with build timestamp of
the last upstream binary release. But if you like it better I appended
revision number to the version.
I am also not sure what to make of the copyright holder of some the
files in "templates/projecttemplates/". By the looks of it, it is a
template/example thing.
On the other hand, there seems to be a "Symbian Software" (possibly
now owned by Nokia), so it could be a real copyright statement. If the
latter is the case, the copyright statement is missing in d/copyright.
Right, template.properties and template.xml seem to have real copyrights,
added them to the list. Rest of the files are just templates with placeholders
for copyright.
Regards,
Jakub
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f5d28d0.6040...@ktknet.cz
