On 2012-02-02 22:41, Jakub Adam wrote: > Hi, > >> This license in itself is discriminating against users, so it has to go >> in non-free unless we can obtain it under a better license. > > for completeness I paste here a link to analysis I got from debian-legal > [1] > (nothing much new there). I will try to contact upstream and clarify the > license. > > Hopefully Nokia will allow me to use the code under free license because > as I > found out some files are already available under LGPL, for example > qswt/shared/shared_global_p.h is a private header distributed with Qt. > > Regards > > Jakub > > [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2012/02/msg00002.html > >
Actually, we can replace the private headers with clearly LGPL-licensed counterparts, it should be ok. I recall doing something like this with tijmp. ~Niels -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f5c7a51.4040...@thykier.net
