Re: GRAVE bug in j2re1.4 packages

2003-12-09 Thread José Fonseca
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 10:38:46AM -0500, Brian Almeida wrote: > On Tuesday 09 December 2003 10:30, José Fonseca wrote: > > I guess there are too alternatives here: > > > > a) don't include kerbero stuff and depend on the respectives debian > > packages. > > > > b) include the alternatives bu

Re: GRAVE bug in j2re1.4 packages

2003-12-09 Thread Brian Almeida
On Tuesday 09 December 2003 10:30, José Fonseca wrote: > I guess there are too alternatives here: > > a) don't include kerbero stuff and depend on the respectives debian > packages. > > b) include the alternatives but with a lower priority > > I'm inclined towards a) as I believe the less we

Re: GRAVE bug in j2re1.4 packages

2003-12-09 Thread José Fonseca
[I'm CC'ing debian-java so that we have more feedback] On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 02:47:00PM +, José Fonseca wrote: > Brian, I'm going to check what the problem you describe. [...] > > On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 09:36:05AM -0500, Brian Almeida wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I discovered a grave bug with j