On Tuesday 09 December 2003 10:30, José Fonseca wrote: > I guess there are too alternatives here: > > a) don't include kerbero stuff and depend on the respectives debian > packages. > > b) include the alternatives but with a lower priority > > I'm inclined towards a) as I believe the less we rely on external > binaries the better. Does anybody disagree? I wouldn't mind having alternatives if the krb5-user package USED them! :)
I would say leave the binaries in /usr/bin alone and let people use the ones in /usr/lib/j2se as needed. (option a) Brian -- Brian Almeida | http://tynian.net | [EMAIL PROTECTED] Debian Developer | http://www.debian.org | [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
