On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 10:38:46AM -0500, Brian Almeida wrote: > On Tuesday 09 December 2003 10:30, José Fonseca wrote: > > I guess there are too alternatives here: > > > > a) don't include kerbero stuff and depend on the respectives debian > > packages. > > > > b) include the alternatives but with a lower priority > > > > I'm inclined towards a) as I believe the less we rely on external > > binaries the better. Does anybody disagree? > I wouldn't mind having alternatives if the krb5-user package USED them! > :) > > I would say leave the binaries in /usr/bin alone and let people use > the ones in /usr/lib/j2se as needed. (option a)
Done. I've simply not included those binaries since they were described as optional in the README. Check the new revision from http://jrfonseca.dyndns.org/debian/ and tell me if everything is as you expect. Jose Fonseca -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
