On 02/12/2013 19:24, Andrew Ross wrote:
> On 27/11/13 19:34, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
>> On 26/11/2013 13:08, Vedran Miletić wrote:
>>> Why is this an issue? This updates is intended for stable only.
>> The issue here is that we have to upload it before in unstable (cf the
>> request of the Release M
2013/12/2 Andrew Ross :
> Unless removal is imminent (days, rather than weeks), then it seems
> reasonable to me to depend on it for the period of time required to get
> the update into stable. If I've followed the thread correctly my
> understanding is that Netbeans has been broken in stable by a
On 27/11/13 19:34, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> On 26/11/2013 13:08, Vedran Miletić wrote:
>>
>> Why is this an issue? This updates is intended for stable only.
> The issue here is that we have to upload it before in unstable (cf the
> request of the Release Manager)
> To build correctly under unstable
On 26/11/2013 13:08, Vedran Miletić wrote:
> 2013/11/25 Sylvestre Ledru :
>> On 25/11/2013 20:21, Joachim Zobel wrote:
>>> Am Montag, den 25.11.2013, 11:58 +0100 schrieb Sylvestre Ledru:
With openjdk-7-jdk:amd64 (7u25-2.3.12-4)
>>> The netbeans package does not build with openjdk-7. Since my i
Le 26/11/2013 13:08, Vedran Miletić a écrit :
> 2013/11/25 Sylvestre Ledru :
>> On 25/11/2013 20:21, Joachim Zobel wrote:
>>> Am Montag, den 25.11.2013, 11:58 +0100 schrieb Sylvestre Ledru:
With openjdk-7-jdk:amd64 (7u25-2.3.12-4)
>>> The netbeans package does not build with openjdk-7. Since m
2013/11/25 Sylvestre Ledru :
> On 25/11/2013 20:21, Joachim Zobel wrote:
>> Am Montag, den 25.11.2013, 11:58 +0100 schrieb Sylvestre Ledru:
>>> With openjdk-7-jdk:amd64 (7u25-2.3.12-4)
>> The netbeans package does not build with openjdk-7. Since my intention
>> was to change as little as possible a
On 25/11/2013 20:21, Joachim Zobel wrote:
> Am Montag, den 25.11.2013, 11:58 +0100 schrieb Sylvestre Ledru:
>> With openjdk-7-jdk:amd64 (7u25-2.3.12-4)
> The netbeans package does not build with openjdk-7. Since my intention
> was to change as little as possible and since I am not very
> knowledgea
Am Montag, den 25.11.2013, 11:58 +0100 schrieb Sylvestre Ledru:
> With openjdk-7-jdk:amd64 (7u25-2.3.12-4)
The netbeans package does not build with openjdk-7. Since my intention
was to change as little as possible and since I am not very
knowledgeable about java packaging I did not change that.
I
On 25/11/2013 05:54, Joachim Zobel wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Since no one has uploaded this yet I wanted to advertise this a bit.
>
Sorry about that.
I just tried to build it in a cowbuilder but it fails with:
[javac] missing type arguments for generic class Entry
[javac] where K,V are type-variables:
[j
Hi.
Since no one has uploaded this yet I wanted to advertise this a bit.
The netbeans package is currently broken, in that
you can't create projects (#720684),
SVN is not working (#698514, #668015) and
the GUI builder is not working (#677125, #653915).
This affects stable, the package is inte
Am Donnerstag, den 07.11.2013, 22:46 +0100 schrieb Matthias Klose:
> Am 06.11.2013 21:11, schrieb Joachim Zobel:
> > * Workaround for bug #720684 in openjdk-6-jdk.
> > - Changes the jdk dependency to openjdk-7-jdk.
> > - Changes the laucher script to use openjdk-7-jdk.
>
> so this st
Am 06.11.2013 21:11, schrieb Joachim Zobel:
> * Workaround for bug #720684 in openjdk-6-jdk.
> - Changes the jdk dependency to openjdk-7-jdk.
> - Changes the laucher script to use openjdk-7-jdk.
so this still keeps an rc issue open for jessie to not build using openjdk-7.
--
To UN
Hi.
I have fixed the current netbeans package and requested a pu:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=728906
In a response I have been told I need to request an upload to unstable
first. So I am looking for a sponsor to upload this.
Is a changelog with "stable" (as below) which refle
13 matches
Mail list logo
