2013/12/2 Andrew Ross <ubu...@rossfamily.co.uk>:
> Unless removal is imminent (days, rather than weeks), then it seems
> reasonable to me to depend on it for the period of time required to get
> the update into stable. If I've followed the thread correctly my
> understanding is that Netbeans has been broken in stable by a Java
> security update, and so fixing it isn't a stupid idea.
>

+1

> I'm tracking the effort on https://wiki.debian.org/Java/Netbeans - I've
> got three packages awaiting sponsoring, two of which need to go through
> the new queue, and the main netbeans package itself is pretty much
> ready, although could do with some tidying. It uses openjdk-7 to build
> (in fact Java 7 or greater is required). But if we're going to update in
> stable then we should do this first, so the stable update can be tested
> in unstable first.
>

Is there a place where ordinary jessie/sid users could find amd64
binaries of those packages? I'm aware of your effort on Ubuntu side
but it looks unrelated.

Regards,
Vedran


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/CA+oUA23aOHfU-J8kc7ohYkym5zwS5_JM6D31zRn7C=raxr5...@mail.gmail.com

Reply via email to