Re: Debian-Java 2025 wishlists

2025-01-06 Thread Julien Plissonneau Duquène
And sorry the link was missing, here it is: [1]: https://salsa.debian.org/jpd/debian-java-2025/-/blob/main/Java-Wishlists-2025.md Cheers, -- Julien Plissonneau Duquène

Re: Debian-Java 2025 wishlists

2025-01-06 Thread Julien Plissonneau Duquène
n its way (thanks to M. Klose). I grouped the wishes in 6 main themes that are: - JDK/JRE - Build Tools, Languages and Debian Java Tooling - Debian Java Documentation - Helping - Testing - Packaging - Housekeeping If I forgot anything or anyone there, or you think the themes could be adjusted d

Re: Debian-Java 2025 wishlists

2025-01-02 Thread Markus Koschany
Hello Antonin, Am Dienstag, dem 31.12.2024 um 16:00 +0100 schrieb Antonin Delpeuch (lists): > Another wish from myself: > > - that I try to update openrefine to the latest version > > - and that someone mentors me to publish it > > Thank you all for your amazing work! Openrefine is on my radar

Re: Debian-Java 2025 wishlists

2024-12-31 Thread Antonin Delpeuch (lists)
Another wish from myself: - that I try to update openrefine to the latest version - and that someone mentors me to publish it Thank you all for your amazing work! Antonin On 30/12/2024 14:41, Julien Plissonneau Duquène wrote: Hi, Last call for the wishlists ... As of now I count 7 contribut

Re: Debian-Java 2025 wishlists

2024-12-30 Thread tony mancill
On Mon, Dec 30, 2024 at 02:41:03PM +0100, Julien Plissonneau Duquène wrote: > Hi, > > Last call for the wishlists ... As of now I count 7 contributions > including mine, and there are 450 subscribers to this list, so less than > 1.6 % of subscribers participated so far. Can we try to double that a

Re: Debian-Java 2025 wishlists

2024-12-30 Thread Julien Plissonneau Duquène
Hi, Last call for the wishlists ... As of now I count 7 contributions including mine, and there are 450 subscribers to this list, so less than 1.6 % of subscribers participated so far. Can we try to double that and reach the 3 %? Le 2024-12-17 12:00, sre4e...@free.fr a écrit : As we are no

Re: Debian-Java 2025 wishlists

2024-12-25 Thread Raphael Jolly
- package http://raphael.jolly.free.fr/linoleum/ merry chistmasOn Dec 24, 2024 11:57, Julien Plissonneau Duquène wrote: > > Hi, > > Here is my very optimistic Debian Java/JVM wishlist for 2025: > > - upgrade Gradle, Groovy, Kotlin > - package GraalVM > - upgrade A

Re: Debian-Java 2025 wishlists

2024-12-24 Thread Julien Plissonneau Duquène
Hi, Here is my very optimistic Debian Java/JVM wishlist for 2025: - upgrade Gradle, Groovy, Kotlin - package GraalVM - upgrade Android SDKs - package SBT - package Kafka - package IDEA CE - package Android Studio - fix javadoc issues (reproducibility, reliability, jquery, links...) - negotiate

Re: Debian-Java 2025 wishlists

2024-12-18 Thread Loïc Rouchon
Hi, Thank you for this opportunity, here is my wishlist, mostly focused on making packaging easier, especially for people unfamiliar with the Debian packaging system (like me): 1/ Make the Debian version of maven able to locate its own plugins. Simplest example I could come up with. - Followi

Re: Debian-Java 2025 wishlists

2024-12-18 Thread Jérôme Charaoui
Hello, Le 2024-12-18 à 03 h 24, Emmanuel Bourg a écrit : - Upload Jetty 12 This gets a +1 from me, as my Puppet packages are still carrying patches to make them backwards compatible with Jetty 9 ... -- Jérôme

Re: Debian-Java 2025 wishlists

2024-12-18 Thread Matthias Klose
On 18.12.24 09:24, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: - Start testing the packages with Java 24/25 - Include OpenJDK 25 (next LTS) in Trixie as a preview sure, this can be done with the current 24 packages in unstable. openjdk-25 is awaiting NEW review. However I would like to avoid adding it in trixie,

Re: Debian-Java 2025 wishlists

2024-12-18 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 17/12/2024 à 12:00, sre4e...@free.fr a écrit : As we are now in the heart of the wishlist season, I would like to proceed with a little experiment and collect your wishes for the Java and JVM ecosystems in Debian next year. Good idea! Just post what you can think about as a reply to this

Debian-Java 2025 wishlists

2024-12-17 Thread sre4ever
Hi, As we are now in the heart of the wishlist season, I would like to proceed with a little experiment and collect your wishes for the Java and JVM ecosystems in Debian next year. Just post what you can think about as a reply to this message, regardless of other proposals (don't worry about

Request to join the debian java team

2022-11-16 Thread min sun
Hi, everyone ! I want to join the debian-java familiy ! I’m an java developer and benefited a lot from open source projects . I wish I can do some work for the team within my capability . All the best ! Live for truth

Wish to join the debian java team

2022-11-16 Thread min sun
Hi, everyone ! I want to join the debian-java familiy ! I’m an java developer and benefited a lot from open source projects . I wish I can do some work for the team within my capability . All the best ! Live for truth,goodness

Re: joining Debian Java Team

2021-12-08 Thread Markus Koschany
Am Dienstag, dem 07.12.2021 um 20:28 -0500 schrieb Joe Nahmias: > [...] > Yes, I am a DD and have requested team membership on salsa since quite some > time ago. Access granted. Welcome on board! signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: joining Debian Java Team

2021-12-07 Thread Joe Nahmias
Hello Markus, On Tue, Dec 07, 2021 at 09:56:06PM +0100, Markus Koschany wrote: > Hello Joe, > > Am Dienstag, dem 07.12.2021 um 10:51 -0500 schrieb Joe Nahmias: > > Hello, > > > > I'd like to pacakge a number of Java libs/apps under the framework of the >

Re: joining Debian Java Team

2021-12-07 Thread Markus Koschany
Hello Joe, Am Dienstag, dem 07.12.2021 um 10:51 -0500 schrieb Joe Nahmias: > Hello, > > I'd like to pacakge a number of Java libs/apps under the framework of the > Debian Java team. How do I join? > > Thanks, > --Joe Are you a DM or DD? Then you can request team memb

joining Debian Java Team

2021-12-07 Thread Joe Nahmias
Hello, I'd like to pacakge a number of Java libs/apps under the framework of the Debian Java team. How do I join? Thanks, --Joe signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: No CI/CD settings in packages of Debian Java team?

2021-04-16 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Emmanuel, On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 09:41:11PM +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > > Is there any good reason for this setting? > > When Salsa was set up we were instructed no to overuse the CI system, I > don't know how this has evolved now. As far as I know this has settled now. > Personally I t

Re: No CI/CD settings in packages of Debian Java team?

2021-04-16 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 16/04/2021 à 15:13, Andreas Tille a écrit : >> repos in java-team have pipelines disabled by default. > > Is there any good reason for this setting? When Salsa was set up we were instructed no to overuse the CI system, I don't know how this has evolved now. Personally I think this isn't very

Re: No CI/CD settings in packages of Debian Java team?

2021-04-16 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Sudip, On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 10:48:51AM +0100, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > > This entry can be found in the menu between Repository and Operations. > > I intended to do this setting for packages (for instance cronometer and > > cdk). However, the whole menu entry is missing. I have no idea why

Re: No CI/CD settings in packages of Debian Java team?

2021-04-16 Thread Phil Morrell
On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 10:48:51AM +0100, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 9:34 AM Andreas Tille wrote: > > in Debian Med we are activating Salsa-CI by adding debian/salsa-ci.yml > > to all packages and set this in > > > > -> Settings -> CI/CD > > repos in java-team have pipe

Re: No CI/CD settings in packages of Debian Java team?

2021-04-16 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
Hi Andreas, On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 9:34 AM Andreas Tille wrote: > > Hi, > > in Debian Med we are activating Salsa-CI by adding debian/salsa-ci.yml > to all packages and set this in > > -> Settings -> CI/CD > > This entry can be found in the menu between Repository and Operations. > I intend

No CI/CD settings in packages of Debian Java team?

2021-04-16 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, in Debian Med we are activating Salsa-CI by adding debian/salsa-ci.yml to all packages and set this in -> Settings -> CI/CD This entry can be found in the menu between Repository and Operations. I intended to do this setting for packages (for instance cronometer and cdk). However, the

Re: Any hints about maven libs from Debian Java team (Was: IGV update - any takers?)

2019-11-14 Thread Markus Koschany
Am 14.11.19 um 14:28 schrieb Olivier Sallou: [...] >> Try to disable the build-dependency and analyze how much code is >> depending on it. Maybe it is not necessary to get a functional IGV >> package, otherwise someone ™ must package it. > > > the pb is to know what is "functional". We may patch

Re: Any hints about maven libs from Debian Java team (Was: IGV update - any takers?)

2019-11-14 Thread Olivier Sallou
On 11/14/19 2:10 PM, Markus Koschany wrote: > Hi, > > Am 14.11.19 um 09:44 schrieb Andreas Tille: >> Hi, >> >> I'd be very happy if Debian Java team could comment on the analysis >> of libs done by Olivier to enable us upgrading IGV. >> >> On Thu

Re: Any hints about maven libs from Debian Java team (Was: IGV update - any takers?)

2019-11-14 Thread Markus Koschany
Hi, Am 14.11.19 um 09:44 schrieb Andreas Tille: > Hi, > > I'd be very happy if Debian Java team could comment on the analysis > of libs done by Olivier to enable us upgrading IGV. > > On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 09:34:51AM +0100, Olivier Sallou wrote: >> >> I had

Any hints about maven libs from Debian Java team (Was: IGV update - any takers?)

2019-11-14 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, I'd be very happy if Debian Java team could comment on the analysis of libs done by Olivier to enable us upgrading IGV. On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 09:34:51AM +0100, Olivier Sallou wrote: > > I had a quick look at latest version. It seems to be have been rewritten > a lot, a lots

debian-java and autopkgtest test suite

2019-08-24 Thread Geert Stappers
In-Reply-To: On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 02:47:12PM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote: > Am 22.08.19 um 10:35 schrieb Vincent Prat: > >> Hi all, > >> > >> I have finished packaging the core library using eclipse-debian-helper. > >> Should I also package extensions even if I do not plan to use them? > >

Re: Request to join the Debian Java Maintainers group, your power required :-)

2019-08-14 Thread Geert Stappers
On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 11:19:33PM +, Debian GitLab wrote: > > > Vincent Prat (https://salsa.debian.org/vivi-guest) requested Developer access > to the Debian Java Maintainers group. > > https://salsa.debian.org/groups/java-team/-/group_members > > -- > &g

Re: Looking on how to contribute to the Debian Java Packaging Team

2019-04-09 Thread Andreas Tille
asking for help as I did here: https://lists.debian.org/debian-java/2019/04/msg00017.html So feel free to clone the just created Git repository I've linked to and check why the JAR is not created any more. Kind regards Andreas. [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=923749#22 -- http://fam-tille.de

Re: Looking on how to contribute to the Debian Java Packaging Team

2019-04-08 Thread Eugene Zhukov
Hi Armando, As mentioned we are in freeze now, so please go ahead and help fix/test some of release critical bugs: https://bugs.debian.org/release-critical/debian/main.html Another way to start would be to install and run how-can-i-help package. If you have some gradle experience you could help

Re: Looking on how to contribute to the Debian Java Packaging Team

2019-04-06 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
Hey Armando, Thanks for your interest and welcome! There are many ways to jump into Java packaging. One way is to go through the bug reports and try confirming them and fixing them. Right now Debian/buster is in the release freeze, so it is a great time to fix bugs for the upcoming release. Ot

Looking on how to contribute to the Debian Java Packaging Team

2019-04-06 Thread ARMANDO FERREIRA LEE ENG
Hi, Happy Friday to all of you! I hope you are doing pretty well. My name is Armando Ferreira, I'm a Java Software Engineer that works at Mountain View, CA. I have been using Debian since college as my main OS, since that time I always wanted to contribute to the community but I was too young

Re: Request to join Debian Java Packaging Project

2019-04-01 Thread Andrius Merkys
On 2019-04-01 17:37, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Also, don't forget to use the repository creation script [1], it ensures > all the Java Team repositories are configured the same way. Yes, I've noticed this requirement on project's page on Salsa. Thanks for reminding. Best wishes, Andrius -- Andriu

Re: Request to join Debian Java Packaging Project

2019-04-01 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 01/04/2019 à 15:50, Andrius Merkys a écrit : > On 2019-04-01 16:39, Markus Koschany wrote: >> You just needed the "maintainer" status. I've granted it a minute ago. >> Welcome on board! > > Thanks a lot for adding me! Also, don't forget to use the repository creation script [1], it ensures al

Re: Request to join Debian Java Packaging Project

2019-04-01 Thread Andrius Merkys
Dear Markus, On 2019-04-01 16:39, Markus Koschany wrote: > You just needed the "maintainer" status. I've granted it a minute ago. > Welcome on board! Thanks a lot for adding me! Best wishes, Andrius -- Andrius Merkys Vilnius University Institute of Biotechnology, Saulėtekio al. 7, room V325 LT

Re: Request to join Debian Java Packaging Project

2019-04-01 Thread Markus Koschany
Hi, Am 01.04.19 um 15:26 schrieb Andrius Merkys: > Hello, > > I have recently been granted Developer rights in Debian Java Project on > Salsa (as 'merkys'). However, I am unable to create new repositories > there, and I am willing to upload a couple of new package

Request to join Debian Java Packaging Project

2019-04-01 Thread Andrius Merkys
Hello, I have recently been granted Developer rights in Debian Java Project on Salsa (as 'merkys'). However, I am unable to create new repositories there, and I am willing to upload a couple of new packages. Are there additional requirements for repo creation rights? I have read and I

Re: Fwd: FOSDEM 19 Debian Java talk

2019-02-14 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Hi Robert, Some comments with my Maven package maintainer hat. Le 12/02/2019 à 20:09, Robert Scholte a écrit : > I'm also wondering how you build Maven, since Maven is > being built with Maven. That should be a challenge to also rebuild all > plugins, etc. The maven package is rebuilt with the

Re: Fwd: FOSDEM 19 Debian Java talk

2019-02-14 Thread Gary Gregory
Jar manifest files carry data like "built-by" and implementation information: https://docs.oracle.com/javase/tutorial/deployment/jar/packageman.html Why not reuse "Implementation-Vendor" or invent a new entry and put "Debian" in there. Maven can display this additional information on "mvn -versio

AW: Fwd: FOSDEM 19 Debian Java talk

2019-02-13 Thread Bernd Eckenfels
“, „official“ to avoid those Groups to feel unwelcome (especially in the ASF spirit of open SOURCE). Gruss Bernd -- http://bernd.eckenfels.net Von: Michael Osipov Gesendet: Mittwoch, 13. Februar 2019 19:36 An: Maven Developers List; Robert Scholte; Dalibor Topic; Markus Koschany Cc: debian-java

Re: Fwd: FOSDEM 19 Debian Java talk

2019-02-13 Thread Michael Osipov
Am 2019-02-12 um 20:09 schrieb Robert Scholte: On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 12:34:56 +0100, Markus Koschany wrote: Hello, Dalibor Topic (Oracle) and Robert Scholte (Apache Maven) contacted me and were so kind to agree to make this discussion public, so that others can chime in too. I would like to use

Re: Fwd: FOSDEM 19 Debian Java talk

2019-02-13 Thread Dalibor Topic
Hi Markus, On 12.02.2019 12:34, Markus Koschany wrote: Regarding javadoc generation we would like to see an option that basically reverts to pre OpenJDK8 and simply is less strict than the current implementation. Unfortunately, we don't plan to go back to the pre-Java 8 Javadoc implementatio

Re: Fwd: FOSDEM 19 Debian Java talk

2019-02-13 Thread Markus Koschany
Hi Robert, Am 12.02.19 um 20:09 schrieb Robert Scholte: [...] > Hi Markus, > > first of all thanks for the insights, it is important for us to know how > Maven is used and in which way we can improve that way-of-work. Hervé is > already working hard on the reproducible builds specs with your team

Re: Fwd: FOSDEM 19 Debian Java talk

2019-02-12 Thread Robert Scholte
On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 12:34:56 +0100, Markus Koschany wrote: Hello, Dalibor Topic (Oracle) and Robert Scholte (Apache Maven) contacted me and were so kind to agree to make this discussion public, so that others can chime in too. I would like to use the opportunity to answer the initial question

Fwd: FOSDEM 19 Debian Java talk

2019-02-12 Thread Markus Koschany
Hello, Dalibor Topic (Oracle) and Robert Scholte (Apache Maven) contacted me and were so kind to agree to make this discussion public, so that others can chime in too. I would like to use the opportunity to answer the initial question "what we are interested in seeing better supported from build t

Re: FOSDEM 19 Debian Java talk

2019-02-06 Thread Markus Koschany
t feedback from four audience members after the talk. The Fedora maintainer of Tycho and Eclipse offered help and support if someone wants to update and maintain Eclipse. Someone wanted to get more involved in Debian Java and I suggested to get involved by contacting debian-java@lists.debian.org.

Re: FOSDEM 19 Debian Java talk

2019-02-01 Thread Markus Koschany
Am 01.02.19 um 23:53 schrieb Emmanuel Bourg: > Le 01/02/2019 à 22:41, Markus Koschany a écrit : > >> It is not very important but if you have some spare time in the next month >> we could figure this out and create some sort of statistics page like >> >> https://blends.debian.org/games/maintstats

Re: FOSDEM 19 Debian Java talk

2019-02-01 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 01/02/2019 à 22:41, Markus Koschany a écrit : > It is not very important but if you have some spare time in the next month > we could figure this out and create some sort of statistics page like > > https://blends.debian.org/games/maintstats/ > > just with more information and for fun. The s

Re: FOSDEM 19 Debian Java talk

2019-02-01 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 01/02/2019 à 22:46, Markus Koschany a écrit : > What numbers do we have if you include the libraries too? These numbers include the libraries (but they weren't listed above). > Hmm. Why is this different from > > https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?email=pkg-java-maintainers%40lists.alioth.

Re: FOSDEM 19 Debian Java talk

2019-02-01 Thread Markus Koschany
Am 01.02.19 um 21:39 schrieb Emmanuel Bourg: > Le 01/02/2019 à 14:28, Emmanuel Bourg a écrit : Great. Thanks! > Total packages added to testing: 179 > Total packages removed from testing: 95 > Total packages updated in testing: 291 > Total packages upgraded in testing: 283 What numbers do we h

Re: FOSDEM 19 Debian Java talk

2019-02-01 Thread Markus Koschany
Hi! Am 01.02.19 um 14:28 schrieb Emmanuel Bourg: > Hi Markus, > > Le 29/01/2019 à 19:00, Markus Koschany a écrit : > >> I will attend FOSDEM 19 in Brussels this weekend (03.02.2019, 12:40 >> local time) and give a lightning talk (15 min) about our heroics. >> >> https://fosdem.org/2019/schedule/

Re: FOSDEM 19 Debian Java talk

2019-02-01 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 01/02/2019 à 14:28, Emmanuel Bourg a écrit : > I have a script that compares the packages between two releases but I > haven't published it yet. I'll run it and post the result for the > stretch/testing differences. Here is the summary for the stretch -> testing changes (the libraries are not

Re: FOSDEM 19 Debian Java talk

2019-02-01 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Hi Markus, Le 29/01/2019 à 19:00, Markus Koschany a écrit : > I will attend FOSDEM 19 in Brussels this weekend (03.02.2019, 12:40 > local time) and give a lightning talk (15 min) about our heroics. > > https://fosdem.org/2019/schedule/event/debian_java/ Thanks a lot for holding that talk. I won

Re: FOSDEM 19 Debian Java talk

2019-02-01 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
Emmanuel Bourg: > Le 30/01/2019 à 22:59, Hans-Christoph Steiner a écrit : > >> I thought it was worth a blog post too, as a follow up to your talk: >> https://salsa.debian.org/publicity-team/bits/merge_requests/16 > > Nice, remember the Java Team also has its own blog [1], that might be > nice

Re: FOSDEM 19 Debian Java talk

2019-01-30 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 30/01/2019 à 22:59, Hans-Christoph Steiner a écrit : > I thought it was worth a blog post too, as a follow up to your talk: > https://salsa.debian.org/publicity-team/bits/merge_requests/16 Nice, remember the Java Team also has its own blog [1], that might be nice to announce the FOSDEM talk th

Re: FOSDEM 19 Debian Java talk

2019-01-30 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
hat I would add: >> >> I think one thing to mention is how the Debian Java Team has to >> consistently fight the Java standard practice of bundling all deps into >> a single JAR. This means there is no shared security updates, each dev >> has to update every dependency them

Re: FOSDEM 19 Debian Java talk

2019-01-30 Thread Markus Koschany
Am 30.01.19 um 11:10 schrieb Hans-Christoph Steiner: > > Great that you are giving that talk! I think the Java Team's work is > generally under-appreciated, so getting the word out should help with > that. Here's what I would add: > > I think one thing to mention

Re: FOSDEM 19 Debian Java talk

2019-01-30 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
Great that you are giving that talk! I think the Java Team's work is generally under-appreciated, so getting the word out should help with that. Here's what I would add: I think one thing to mention is how the Debian Java Team has to consistently fight the Java standard practice o

FOSDEM 19 Debian Java talk

2019-01-29 Thread Markus Koschany
tagged bugs list for example. https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?users=debian-java@lists.debian.org;tag=default-java9 What specific OpenJDK changes caused the most grief? Why we all love JavaDoc? :E etc. If you have some other fun statistic, please let me know. Regards, Markus [1

Re: Debian java policy and modular jar files

2019-01-22 Thread Bill Zaumen
Hi Emanuel, Thanks for your reply. On Tue, 2019-01-22 at 09:17 +0100, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Hi Bill, > > Le 22/01/2019 à 01:09, Bill Zaumen a écrit : > > > the following commands will cause java to crash: > > > > java -p /usr/share/java --list-modules > > java -p /usr/share/java --

Re: Debian java policy and modular jar files

2019-01-22 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Hi Bill, Le 22/01/2019 à 01:09, Bill Zaumen a écrit : > the following commands will cause java to crash: > > java -p /usr/share/java --list-modules > java -p /usr/share/java --describe-module MODULE I don't think this is a use case we can reasonably support. Even if there were no sy

Debian java policy and modular jar files

2019-01-21 Thread Bill Zaumen
The Debian java policy appears to need some clarification regarding how to handle modular jar files. A few things don't work the way one might expect with Java 11 (the default jdk on my system). 1. If you create a file with a version string such as libfoo-1.1.0.jar and symbolic

Re: debian-java-faq seems to be pretty old -

2018-09-03 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 03/09/2018 à 17:41, Thorsten Glaser a écrit : > GCJ is more portable and can create native executables for > many Java™ programs (though not those doing classloader > magic at runtime, for example) — these two reasons are still > extant, although I have heard GCJ no longer is :| GCJ is indeed

Re: debian-java-faq seems to be pretty old -

2018-09-03 Thread Thorsten Glaser
On Sun, 2 Sep 2018, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > > I was surprised to know that gnu java which at one point was a > > high-priority project was deprecated within gcc > > When Sun released Java under the GPL and started the OpenJDK project it > lost its raison d'être. One of them. GCJ is more portabl

Re: debian-java-faq seems to be pretty old -

2018-09-03 Thread Osamu Aoki
Hi, On Sun, Sep 02, 2018 at 06:46:00PM +0200, Javier Fernandez-Sanguino wrote: > The java-policy package should have a copy of the original document (with no > alterations). It should also include a README file to point contributors to > the > Salsa repository for the java-faw I am a bit confuse

debian-java-faq uploaded

2018-09-03 Thread Osamu Aoki
> Please go through the latest revised debian-java-faq.dbk and let me > know if any more changes are required or got left over . Well I fixed typos etc. and updated build script. dsssl is too old. Anyway, VCS-git was totally outdated. So I uploaded with new URL after making package buil

Re: debian-java-faq seems to be pretty old -

2018-09-02 Thread shirish शिरीष
did. Please go through the latest revised debian-java-faq.dbk and let me know if any more changes are required or got left over . -- Regards, Shirish Agarwal शिरीष अग्रवाल My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/

Re: debian-java-faq seems to be pretty old -

2018-09-02 Thread shirish शिरीष
erge_requests/1 just >> for comparison purposes whether it's good or not. >> >> Quite a few questions of the above need answering before the same can >> be considered somewhat done (for now) . > > I have done XML conversion. > > Please consider doing this too. >

Re: debian-java-faq seems to be pretty old -

2018-09-02 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
t https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-java-faq/ch2.en.html > > gcj and libgcj: http://gcc.gnu.org/java/ > > Classpath http://www.classpath.org. Most of the Standard classes for > Java 1.2 (except Swing and RMI) are implemented by the ClassPath > project, it tries to build an

Re: debian-java-faq seems to be pretty old -

2018-09-02 Thread Javier Fernandez-Sanguino
olicy/merge_requests/1 just > > for comparison purposes whether it's good or not. > > > > Quite a few questions of the above need answering before the same can > > be considered somewhat done (for now) . > > I have done XML conversion. > > Please consider doin

Re: debian-java-faq seems to be pretty old -

2018-09-02 Thread Osamu Aoki
> > Quite a few questions of the above need answering before the same can > be considered somewhat done (for now) . I have done XML conversion. Please consider doing this too. $ cd faq $ debiandoc2dbk -1 debian-java-faq.sgml $ rm debian-java-faq.sgml Now you have DocBook 4.5 Then

Re: debian-java-faq seems to be pretty old -

2018-09-02 Thread shirish शिरीष
at bottom :- On 02/09/2018, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > On 31/08/2018 18:27, shirish शिरीष wrote: > >> 1.2 Location of this FAQ >> >> This FAQ is published under the Debian Documentation Project at >> http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-java-faq/. The jav

Re: debian-java-faq seems to be pretty old -

2018-09-01 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
On 31/08/2018 18:27, shirish शिरीष wrote: > 1.2 Location of this FAQ > > This FAQ is published under the Debian Documentation Project at > http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-java-faq/. The java-common > (available at http://packages.debian.org/java-common) provides an HTM

Re: debian-java-faq seems to be pretty old -

2018-08-31 Thread shirish शिरीष
t; disclaimer in the GIT instead. Otherwise we will end up with contradicting > sources of information which is not very helpful to our users. > I am not really an expert in either java or HTML/SGML . If somebody can make a git repo. of the whole documentation from https://www.debian.org/doc

Re: debian-java-faq seems to be pretty old -

2018-08-31 Thread Markus Koschany
Hi, Am 31.08.2018 um 19:36 schrieb Javier Fernandez-Sanguino: [...] > I agree too as I wrote most of the content a long time ago (18 years!). > > This is > partly because the people who created the old Debian Java FAQ are no > longer involved in Debian Java o

Re: debian-java-faq seems to be pretty old -

2018-08-31 Thread Javier Fernandez-Sanguino
Hi there, El vie., 31 ago. 2018 19:03, Markus Koschany escribió: > Hello, > > Am 31.08.2018 um 18:27 schrieb shirish शिरीष: > > Dear all, > > > > I was reading > > > > https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-java-faq/ > > > > and it seem

Re: debian-java-faq seems to be pretty old -

2018-08-31 Thread Markus Koschany
Hello, Am 31.08.2018 um 18:27 schrieb shirish शिरीष: > Dear all, > > I was reading > > https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-java-faq/ > > and it seems the manual is pretty old and seems to have lot of oudated info. [...] We have recently started to improve our Jav

debian-java-faq seems to be pretty old -

2018-08-31 Thread shirish शिरीष
Dear all, I was reading https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-java-faq/ and it seems the manual is pretty old and seems to have lot of oudated info. For instance just at the beginning itself - 1.2 Location of this FAQ This FAQ is published under the Debian Documentation Project at http

Re: shouldn't openjdk-11-jre have maintainer as debian-java@lists.debian.org instead of open...@lists.launchpad.net and openjfx

2018-08-24 Thread 殷啟聰 | Kai-Chung Yan
Hello Shirish, > Btw, do you mean the gradle version in 'experimental' by any chance ? > > $ apt-cache policy gradle > gradle: > Installed: 3.4.1-7 > Candidate: 3.4.1-7 > Version table: > 4.4-1 100 > 100 http://deb.debian.org/debian experimental/main amd64 Packages > *** 3.4.

Re: shouldn't openjdk-11-jre have maintainer as debian-java@lists.debian.org instead of open...@lists.launchpad.net and openjfx

2018-08-23 Thread shirish शिरीष
Reply in-line :- On 24/08/2018, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Hi Shirish, > Hi Emmanuel, > On 23/08/2018 16:09, shirish शिरीष wrote: >> Wouldn't it better to have the maintainer be reflected to >> debian-java@lists.debian.org perhaps ? IIRC there used to be an alioth >

Re: shouldn't openjdk-11-jre have maintainer as debian-java@lists.debian.org instead of open...@lists.launchpad.net and openjfx

2018-08-23 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Hi Shirish, On 23/08/2018 16:09, shirish शिरीष wrote: > Wouldn't it better to have the maintainer be reflected to > debian-java@lists.debian.org perhaps ? IIRC there used to be an alioth > list which used to look at the maintenance before. debian-java@lists.debian.org is a discussi

shouldn't openjdk-11-jre have maintainer as debian-java@lists.debian.org instead of open...@lists.launchpad.net and openjfx

2018-08-23 Thread shirish शिरीष
pot JIT Full Java runtime environment - needed for executing Java GUI and Webstart programs, using Hotspot JIT. Homepage: http://openjdk.java.net/ Tags: uitoolkit::gtk Wouldn't it better to have the maintainer be reflected to debian-java@lists.debian.org perhaps ? IIRC there used to be an alioth

Re: Request to join the Debian Java Maintainers group

2018-08-02 Thread Geert Stappers
On Thu, Aug 02, 2018 at 10:18:02PM +, Debian GitLab wrote: > mirabilos (https://salsa.debian.org/tg) requested Developer access to the > Debian Java Maintainers group. > > https://salsa.debian.org/groups/java-team/-/group_members > Seemed to be done 7 hours ago. Groeten

Re: Access to the Debian Java Maintainers group was granted

2018-04-24 Thread Markus Koschany
Am 24.04.2018 um 12:37 schrieb Daniel Pocock: > > > On 24/04/18 11:58, Debian GitLab wrote: >> You have been granted Developer access to the Debian Java Maintainers >> <https://salsa.debian.org/groups/java-team> group. >> > > > Do I need Owner level

Re: Access to the Debian Java Maintainers group was granted

2018-04-24 Thread Daniel Pocock
On 24/04/18 11:58, Debian GitLab wrote: > You have been granted Developer access to the Debian Java Maintainers > <https://salsa.debian.org/groups/java-team> group. > Do I need Owner level access to import a repository from alioth? The migration script is giving me an error. Regards, Daniel

Re: Request to join the debian-java team

2017-08-05 Thread Markus Koschany
On 05/08/17 06:25, Alastair McKinstry wrote: Hi, I'd like to join the debian-java team. I've been working on and packaging several Java packages for debian, such as jpy (python-java gateway), thredds, netcdf, geoserver and beam libraries, used in geospatial data (ITPs submitte

Request to join the debian-java team

2017-08-05 Thread Alastair McKinstry
Hi, I'd like to join the debian-java team. I've been working on and packaging several Java packages for debian, such as jpy (python-java gateway), thredds, netcdf, geoserver and beam libraries, used in geospatial data (ITPs submitted). (These packages are interrelated; thredds and be

RE: Mailing list etiquette on debian-java

2017-07-14 Thread Ingo Bauersachs
> @Ingo > > First of all if you felt offended by these words, then I would like to > say that I am sorry. They were not meant to be serious but more with a > wink. I hope that some guy on a mailing list will not ever block you > from contributing to a far greater project. No offense taken. I'm su

Re: Mailing list etiquette on debian-java

2017-07-14 Thread George Bateman
On 14 Jul 2017 19:56, "Geert Stappers" wrote: > > > } May I suggest that we publicly voice our concerns on this list instead > > of contacting our leader who then sends private emails to me? I believe > > this would be more helpful and transparent. > > > > +1 > -1. Hello all! I've only posted to

Re: Mailing list etiquette on debian-java

2017-07-14 Thread Geert Stappers
> } May I suggest that we publicly voice our concerns on this list instead > of contacting our leader who then sends private emails to me? I believe > this would be more helpful and transparent. > +1 Plus https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robustness_principle Groeten Geert Stappers -- Leven en

Mailing list etiquette on debian-java

2017-07-14 Thread Markus Koschany
Hi, It was pointed out to me by our Debian leader no less that I might have hurt someone else's feelings or did use some unnecessary words which might stop people from contributing to Debian. Yesterday I wrote in response to Ingo's email: "I recommend to file bug reports against affected package

Re: Request to Join Project Debian Java packages from Elana Hashman (ehashman-guest)

2017-04-30 Thread tony mancill
.git/ Hello Elana, Thank you for your interest in the Debian Java Team. Your Alioth account is now associated with pkg-java. Please feel to reach out via email or IRC if you have any questions about workflows, etc. You can find contact information here: https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/JavaPack

Re: What is done in Debian Java team for multi source tarball packages (Was: Bug#855941: RFS: scala-pickling/0.10.1-1 ITP: scala-pickling -- Fast, customizable, boilerplate-free pickling support for S

2017-02-27 Thread Frederic Bonnard
my step to move it to Git was somehow useless. I think to > move forward I'll set > > Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers > > Uploaders: Frédéric Bonnard > > check the packaging and upload to new if it is OK. While the package > is waiting in the new q

What is done in Debian Java team for multi source tarball packages (Was: Bug#855941: RFS: scala-pickling/0.10.1-1 ITP: scala-pickling -- Fast, customizable, boilerplate-free pickling support for Scala

2017-02-27 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi again, I just noticed that scala-pickling consists of multiple source tarballs. Unfortunately git-buildpackage does not deal properly with this type of packages. So my step to move it to Git was somehow useless. I think to move forward I'll set Maintainer: Debian Java Mainta

Joining the Debian Java team

2017-02-27 Thread Frederic Bonnard
Sorry for the missing subject. F. On Mon, 27 Feb 2017 13:43:21 +0100, Frederic Bonnard wrote: > Hello, > > I would like to join the Debian Java team. Andreas Tille suggested me to > do so (https://lists.debian.org/debian-java/2017/02/msg00042.html) and I > think > it&#

Re: Docker image to help debian-java

2015-12-08 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
t I plan to use it as a root user and mount an external directory as /root: docker run -t -i -v ~/my-debian-docker-root:/root avdyk/debian-java So you have to put all those files in the directory you'll want to mount. Is it a good way of using docker? -- Arnaud Vandyck http://about.me/avdyk

Re: Docker image to help debian-java

2015-12-08 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 8/12/2015 13:31, Arnaud Vandyck a écrit : > Don't hesitate to comment and improve ;-) Excellent idea, thank you! Here are a few suggestions picked from my build environment: - install and configure pbuilder sudo pbuilder create --debootstrapopts --variant=buildd create /root/.pbuilde

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >