Kumar Appaiah wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 01:48:10PM +0100, David Goodenough wrote:
>
>> Well not really. If all they are intended to be is a source of JARs for
>> development purposes than thats fine (but it would be useful to be told).
>>
>> Its only if they are intended to be all of gl
On Tuesday 09 September 2008, Matthew Johnson wrote:
> On Tue Sep 09 13:48, David Goodenough wrote:
> > Well not really. If all they are intended to be is a source of JARs for
> > development purposes than thats fine (but it would be useful to be told).
>
> It's a bug that you aren't told (-:
>
>
On Tue Sep 09 13:48, David Goodenough wrote:
> Well not really. If all they are intended to be is a source of JARs for
> development purposes than thats fine (but it would be useful to be told).
It's a bug that you aren't told (-:
I'd say either there's a wishlist or normal bug about the descr
On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 01:48:10PM +0100, David Goodenough wrote:
> Well not really. If all they are intended to be is a source of JARs for
> development purposes than thats fine (but it would be useful to be told).
>
> Its only if they are intended to be all of glassfish that there is a bug.
I
On Tuesday 09 September 2008, Vincent Fourmond wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 1:17 PM, David Goodenough
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I am confused about the Glassfish packages on Debian. What are they
> > intended for? They do not seem to i
Hello,
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 1:17 PM, David Goodenough
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am confused about the Glassfish packages on Debian. What are they
> intended for? They do not seem to install a complete running version
> of Glassfish (there is no /etc/init.d script fo
I am confused about the Glassfish packages on Debian. What are they
intended for? They do not seem to install a complete running version
of Glassfish (there is no /etc/init.d script for a start) so I assume that
they are intended just to deliver JARs needed for development.
So this begs two
7 matches
Mail list logo
