packaging XMLUnit 2.x.
Cheers,
tony
[1] https://github.com/xmlunit/user-guide/wiki/Migrating-from-XMLUnit-1.x-to-2.x
On Thu, May 01, 2025 at 01:25:16PM +0200, Mechtilde wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Do you have any problems if I start directly with a version 2 of xmlunit.
>
> It will create som
On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 07:59:53PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
>https://salsa.debian.org/java-team/liblastfm-java/
>
> has visibility set to private. Could some owner please set it to
> public, please.
Done.
Cheers,
tony
new upstream versions are somewhat easier via mentors
anyway.)
Thank you,
tony
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
make it easier to
maintain the packages we do have.
- Less version drift from upstream (where possible).
Thank you for compiling the list, and happy new year!
tony
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
es for video conference at Debconf, we
could schedule a Java BoF to discuss your plans. Afternoon in GMT+9
will the morning in Europe and late evening in the evening in the US.
(Of course, we could do that before or after Debconf too.)
Cheers,
tony
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
k this is suitable for all builds.
Cheers,
tony
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
; built successfully.
Hi Chris,
If it saves you any time (it's a long build), I was able to build
zeroc-ice successfully on armel after adding Vladimir's suggestion to
debian/rules.
Cheers,
tony
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
at do you think?
Hi Felix,
In my opinion we should be remove the outdated freeplane package from
Debian.
Cheers,
tony
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
t cases, but will either update this bug or upload
in the 2-3 days.
Regards,
tony
n up anyway. The dependency on gcj-jdk was dropped from javahelper
(src:javatools) for buster [0].
Thanks for catching this.
Cheers,
tony
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=892530
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
ava-team/jabref/-/blob/master/debian/rules#L13
And be declared as a dependency of the binary package:
https://salsa.debian.org/java-team/jabref/-/blob/master/debian/control#L55
Cheers,
tony
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
the fix should also include
updating debian/control to strictly depend on the version(s) specified
in the patched pom. Without some explicit declaration of dependencies,
it seems like this is going to break again, right?
Thanks,
tony
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
ccessful:
sbuild --chroot=unstable --dist=unstable --arch-any --arch-all
And this build is also successful:
sbuild --chroot=unstable --dist=unstable --no-arch-any --arch-all
Let me know if you have any problems reproducing this locally. It might
be helpful to invoke the build with DH_VERBOSE=1.
Che
pload target unstable or experimental? (Unless you plan to
file an unblock request with the release team for bookworm, I think it
should experimental.)
If that's okay with you, I will update the changelog before sponsoring
the upload.
Cheers,
tony
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
on) will be able to configure
itself, even if perhaps not optimally, without setting either
"+UseParallelGC" or "+UseG1GC". Is that all we need to change?
We should be able to build and ship the package with conservative
(compatible) defaults and document tuning for better per
the standards version
- update the debhelper dependency
Cheers,
tony
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
ution to Debian!
Cheers,
tony
bian Java team" or something else in the
> ITP bug?
That's great! (And I meant to mention that in my first response.) It
definitely sounds like a good package for team maintenance, and the Java
Team is the right one. Please let me know if I can help with reviews,
sponsoring, etc.
Th
t, but after a quick first glance at the source
tree, it appears that the packaging should be straight-forward. For
example, I didn't notice any build dependencies that we would have to
package first.
Filing either an RFP [1] or ITP [2] bug would be a good next step.
Cheers,
ton
rs
> * URL : https://codeberg.org/tob/stegosuite
> * License : GPL3
> Programming Lang: Java
> Description : Steganography tool to hide information in image files
Hello Tobias,
I will sponsor this update. Thank you for your contribution to Debian!
Cheers,
Tony
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi Phil,
On Sat, Aug 20, 2022 at 05:10:10PM +0100, Phil Morrell wrote:
> Feel free to chat with me in #debian-java on irc/matrix and if anyone
> has permissions to the Salsa java-team, please could you add me there.
Done.
Cheers,
tony
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi Paul,
On Sat, Aug 13, 2022 at 09:51:03PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, 3 Jul 2022 21:25:49 +0200 Paul Gevers wrote:
> > Your package failed to build from source on arm64 and armhf while it
> > built there successfully in the past.
>
> I just checked to see if there would be a c
at if you would like. (I recently
configured a local s390x QEMU environment for another project and so
have it ready to go.)
Regards,
tony
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
n, if nothing else,
it is consistent with other languages in Debian. So my vote is to
accept the change.
That fact that so many packages are affected does mean there will be a
lot of uploads, but ideally we will upload at least once per release
cycle (anyway), so the timing of this patch and proposal is reasonable.
I am interested to hear other opinions from the Debian Java Team.
Cheers,
tony
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
ction:
> Version 3
> • uscan invokes the custom script as "script --upstream-version version
> ../spkg_version.orig.tar.gz".
>
> Version 4
> • uscan invokes the custom script as "script --upstream-version version".
I have tested locally, updated debian/watch, and pushed this to the
Salsa repo.
My apologies for the confusion.
tony
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 10:22:04PM +0100, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> libjpf-java is affected by an RC which in turn affects its rdepds like
> osmosis.
>
> I've updated the package in git to modernize the packaging.
>
> tony, do you want to make any changes before upl
? Since it addresses a security concern, I
am intending to set the urgency=high. I have kicked off a ratt build
(133 reverse build dependencies) that is still underway, but everything
has been successful so far. If there are any build failures, I can
follow-up on them sooner.
Thank you,
tony
On Sun, Dec 12, 2021 at 10:37:54AM +0100, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 10/12/2021 à 15:20, Felix Lechner a écrit :
>
> > Lintian cites your manual as supporting documentation for several
> > tags. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8] Such references help users when
> > grasping the conditions that provoke Linti
ebian, I thought readers of this list might have
opinions about whether I should switch the Debian packaging from
building against lapack to openblas.
Thank you for your input!
tony
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
was originally me who asked Peymaneh to contact
> this list, and I was sponsoring the same.
> I was initially of the same opinion that it should be unified into a
> single source package, but ebourg's points against doing that are pretty
> strong too.
> 2) Do "$something-else" for all these packages to stay in sync - again,
> probably bumping versions only when needed.
> With this approach, I do not see a problem in introducing a Go runtime
> source package there
100% agreed. I don't mean to belabor the point. Thank you for the
discussion and for the links to the other language packages.
Cheers,
tony
pens if the
version of the ANTLR parser for language X is subtly incompatible with
language Y, and a user runs a system on Debian that requires both
bindings?)
tony
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 10:47:36AM -0400, Olek Wojnar wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 27, 2021, 04:09 Peymaneh Nejad wrote:
> > Is it intended or wished for that additional runtimes other than Java are
> > packaged in seperate source packages, or would it be better to add another
> > binary package (that'd b
to enable salsa-ci for every package I'd work on,
> please consider to bump my access level to maintainer
I have added you to the team as a Maintainer. Thank you for
contributing!
Be aware that there is not consensus among members of the Java Team
regarding use of salsa-ci, so please discuss on-list before enabling for
large numbers of team-maintained packages.
Cheers,
tony
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
s well.)
Thank you for packaging this.
Cheers,
tony
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi Pierre,
I reviewed the diff, built the package, and build the r-deps
(libspring-java) with ratt.
Thank you for the bug fix. DM rights granted.
Cheers,
tony
On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 05:15:55PM +0100, Pierre Gruet wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have updated the package eclipselink, which FTB
On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 07:10:25PM +0100, Vincent Prat wrote:
> Hi Tony,
>
> >> Should we package Eclipse Collections as a separate project (in which
> >> case I will submit an ITP bug), or update and rename the existing package?
> >> For your information,
lacement. (I'm
assuming that eclipse-collections is a drop-in replacement, or nearly so
- maybe just a Java package name change?)
> Best wishes for the new year
Same to you!
Cheers,
tony
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
> dcut dm --uid "Pierre Gruet" --allow libmiglayout-java
Done.
> With a bit of advance, best wishes for 2021!
Likewise!
Cheers,
tony
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
e added to the Salsa group? My username is pollo.
Hi Louis-Philippe Véronneau,
Welcome to the Java Team!
Cheers,
tony
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
if it didn't work.
Cheers,
tony
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
;m using the
schroot on the porterbox.
In any event, my inclination is to close the unaligned access bug and
open a new bug for the test failure on this architecture. I can't
reproduce it on amd64.
Cheers,
tony
On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 05:34:25PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Thu, 2020-12-03 at 11:28 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > [adding d-java to Cc for greater visibility]
> >
> > On Mon, 2020-11-30 at 09:21 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2020-11-2
n do it to take the load off people.
+1, both for getting this into the Debian and I am also offering to help (if
that helps).
Thank you for noticing this Thorsten.
Cheers,
tony
On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 09:26:13AM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 03:05:26PM -0800, tony mancill wrote:
> > Hello Matthias, Tiago, and other members of the OpenJDK team,
> >
> > Thank you for the recent uploads of 11.0.9.1 [1]. Given that it
>
pdate, would you mind if I prepare an upload of
11.0.9.1 for Debian stable?
Thank you,
tony
[1] https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/openjdk-11
[2] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8250861
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
411
Uid: pgtdeb...@free.fr
Allowed: libdsiutils-java
Cheers,
tony
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
tream.
I like the idea of focusing on a toolchain to make it easier to build
these packages. We should be able to offer them via contrib [1].
Cheers,
tony
[1]
https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-archive.html#the-contrib-archive-area
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Sat, Sep 26, 2020 at 03:40:39PM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote:
> In short: 3.6.2 will not be released again, 8.x could make it into
> Debian 11 but there is a big question mark at the moment, more help is
> appreciated.
Hi Markus,
Can you post a list of what others can help with?
Che
On Sun, Sep 20, 2020 at 01:01:43AM +0100, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 19, 2020 at 11:34 PM tony mancill wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 12:40:44PM +0100, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> > > Hi All,
> > >
> > > While working on #943552 I faced few
y suggested changes then I can go
> ahead and team-upload them. All the changes are only in the
> MANIFEST.MF and nothing in the code.
Hi Sudip,
Sounds reasonable to me.
Cheers,
tony
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
eed to package version 7.x. Debian can start with
8.x from the sources here: https://github.com/openjdk/jmc
Cheers,
tony
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
anks and I hope everyone is having a great week!
Same to you!
Cheers,
tony
On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 11:56:24AM +0300, mer...@debian.org wrote:
> Hi Tony,
>
> On 2020-07-27 16:50, tony mancill wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 08:51:49AM +0300, mer...@debian.org wrote:
> >> What is more, the subtree tool/smsd/ contains only pom.xml, what mig
Hi Andrius,
On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 08:51:49AM +0300, mer...@debian.org wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 2020-07-27 08:38, tony mancill wrote:
> >> It actually seems that org/openscience/cdk/smsd/Isomorphism is not
> >> part of the currently packaged CDK. Any idea how t
f the sources:
➜ cdk-2.3.134.g1bb9a64587 find . -name Isomorphism.java
./legacy/src/main/java/org/openscience/cdk/smsd/Isomorphism.java
But the legacy pom is ignored:
https://salsa.debian.org/java-team/cdk/-/blob/master/debian/libcdk-java.poms#L91
I'll look into the discrepancy with libjgrapht0.6-java, which doesn't
include maven metadata.
Cheers,
tony
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi Dongjin,
On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 07:43:20PM +0900, Dongjin Lee wrote:
> Hi Tony,
>
> > In this case, given that Graal is GPLv2 with the CPE, it feels like we
> should be building it from source.
>
> Thanks for the comprehensive explanation. It was the very answer I ne
e should be
building it from source.
If you are interested, here is a link to the DFSG and an excellent FAQ
about [3,4].
Cheers,
tony
[1] https://github.com/oracle/graal
[2] https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-archive#s-non-free
[3] https://www.debian.org/social_contract.html#guidelines
> What is the preferred solution for this? Can I rename the plugin to:
> org.eclipse.wst.common.emfworkbench ? or just ignore the lintian warning?
In my opinion, you should prefer consistent naming and ignore (or
override) the lintian warning.
Cheers,
tony
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
on script which saves the information in a sqlite
> database and that same script can search for a class or can list the
> classes in a package. Also, has an option to update the database. Tony
> (added in Cc) had been testing it. But I have not made any attempt to
> package it yet, as
On Sun, Jun 28, 2020 at 11:03:37PM -0400, Olek Wojnar wrote:
> Hi tony,
>
> On Sun, Jun 28, 2020 at 9:48 PM tony mancill wrote:
>
> >
> > I attempted to reproduce this but the package depends on
> > libchecker-framework-java and the sources checked into the Salsa r
po-helper/-/blob/debian/1.9.4/src/main/bin/mh_patchpoms#L136
I attempted to reproduce this but the package depends on
libchecker-framework-java and the sources checked into the Salsa repo
[3] don't match what I see uploaded NEW [4]. Do you mind pushing the
branch you used for the upload?
Thank
validation are packaged in Debian yet,
> so they have to be packaged.
javax.activation is found in geronimo-validation-1.1-spec.jar in the
libgeronimo-validation-1.1-spec-java package.
I believe we do need to package something for jakarta.validation.
Cheers,
tony
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
urity-java
> libjaxws-java
> libjackson2-jaxrs-providers-java
Thanks for helping with the update. A rebuild using ratt [1] is an easy
way to validate that the update won't cause an avalanche of FTBFS bugs.
Cheers,
tony
[1] https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/ratt
requests/1
Hi Manas Kashyap,
Thank you for the contribution! I have merged the request and uploaded
the package.
Cheers,
tony
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
am upload.
>* Fix FTBFS. (Closes: #952103)
>* Update Standards-Version to 4.5.0
>* Use debhelper-compat.
> - Update compat level to 12.
>
> Usually Tony sponsors my java contributions. You might want to have a
> look before him. :)
Uploaded. Thank you for the update Sudip!
Cheers,
tony
On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 03:56:35PM +0100, Felix Natter wrote:
> Lilian BENOIT writes:
> > Hello,
>
> hello Lilian, Hans, Tony,
>
> > In july, a message "OpenJDK 13 (ea) entering testing" has been sended on
> > this
> > mailing-list. (https://list
On Wed, Feb 05, 2020 at 04:20:40PM +0100, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Hi tony,
>
> > on January 28th as a reminder). I am in process of building the 8u242
> > source package uploaded to Debian unstable against stretch for a
>
> thanks for the update, but… Debian unstable
e-tests by the end of the week and will upload once I get the
go-ahead from the Security Team.
Cheers,
tony
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
to build.
> tycho-1.2.0 is the first release which builds without any dependency on
> a previous version of tycho. tycho-1.5.1 is the final target but it can
> only be done step-by-step.
>
> Can someone please have a look...
Hi Sudip,
The update looks good to me. I will
Hi Felix,
On Sat, Oct 19, 2019 at 08:13:34PM +0200, Felix Natter wrote:
> hello Tony,
>
> as discussed, here are two more dependencies of freeplane-1.7.10
> (darcula and its dependency iconloader from the same author).
>
> 1. https://salsa.debian.org/java-team/libiconlo
his upload (probably
later this evening).
> @debian-java: Can I post the darcula package and its dependency
> (remaining two dependencies for freeplane-1.7.10) directly on d-java, or
> shall I do it via mentors?
Send me an email whenever you're ready and I will look at this one too.
any other missing attributes).
Feel free to push a branch or repo to Salsa so others can take a look.
There is so much variation in upstreams; the exact steps required depend
on the details of how the library is packaged in the first place.
This is a good example of how packaging Java libraries can become
tedious... :)
Cheers,
tony
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 06:29:08PM +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Oct 2019 06:30:52 -0700, tony mancill wrote:
>
> error: No member named $memberName
> at /usr/share/perl5/Archive/Zip/Archive.pm line 411.
>
> Archive::Zip::Archive::contents(Archive:
** [debian/rules:4: binary] Error 255
I don't know if this is the same issue but wanted to mention it here,
since it seems potentially related. I'd be glad to provide more
debugging information or testing if that would help. libquartz2-java is
an example of a source package that exhibits this issue.
Cheers,
tony
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
nges file for a local build of the package you are
updating. ratt will then build all of the reverse dependencies using
sbuild.
There is a very good wiki page on configuring sbuild here:
https://wiki.debian.org/sbuild
Cheers,
tony
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
roblem" approach when it is feasible.
Occasionally this approach gets complicated during upstream version
updates because there are multiple patches against the same build system
or source files. When that happens, I try to to refactor the patches
with the new version update. But otherwise, I
On Sun, Jun 16, 2019 at 08:24:17AM -0700, tony mancill wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 11:23:39PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > Hi Ryan,
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 11:55:59PM +, Ryan Morillo wrote:
> > > Hi guys,
> > > The jTDS driver has been
On Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 02:18:02PM +0200, Steffen Möller wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On 02.09.19 13:14, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> > Le 30/08/2019 à 05:31, tony mancill a écrit :
> >
> > > I use Guava often at my job, and in my experience guava updates are
> > > saf
#x27;d glad to help with the update and/or with any breakage of reverse
dependencies. It might take me a bit of time to get to it, so feel free
to go ahead with your update as soon as you're ready.
Cheers,
tony
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 04:25:33PM +0200, Felix Natter wrote:
> there is a simple new upstream release of freeplane (1.7.9):
>
> (...)
>
> Could someone please consider uploading this?
Absolutely - thank you for the update!
Cheers,
tony
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
er is not the same as Maintainer, and vivi-guest is
configured as a Developer (as are others).
As Geert suggests, pushing another branch and opening a merge request
should work fine for now.
The team can discuss what the default access level should be.
Cheers,
tony
[1] https://salsa.debi
> >
> > *Java 12*
> >
>
> * jdk-12.0.2+9 (which matches jdk-12.0.2-ga)
>
> *Java 13*
>
> Won't be released until Sept
Hi Martijn,
Thank you for the information. Matthias has uploaded 11.0.4+11 to
unstable, which will let us get started on the security
es, you can attach
them to the bug.
Once buster is released, I'm willing to take a look at updating the
package. Since the package is arch:all, it shouldn't be a problem to
use the updated package from unstable/testing on buster (assuming the
newer version doesn't pull in new dependencies not present in buster).
Cheers,
tony
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, May 26, 2019 at 09:47:13PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 24.05.19 20:29, Martijn Verburg wrote:
> > On Fri, 24 May 2019 at 15:40, tony mancill wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 11:58:14PM +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> >>> Le 23/05/2
;t go ahead and upload to
testing-proposed-updates for Buster? If there are any concerns, please
speak up. Otherwise, I'll work on an upload this weekend.
Thanks,
tony
[1]
https://tracker.debian.org/news/1040268/accepted-openjdk-11-11031-1bpo92-source-amd64-all-into-stretch-backports-bac
le critical open CVEs in the JVM
isn't a good experience for our users. My proposal is that we do what
we need to get 11.0.3-ga-1 into Buster.
From a versioning standpoint, this should work. Am I missing something?
$ dpkg --compare-versions 11.0.3-ga-1 gt 11.0.3+7-1 && ec
On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 12:24:03PM +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 22/05/2019 à 06:17, tony mancill a écrit :
>
> > For stable backports and buster, I agree that we should upload an
> > 11.0.3-ga package, particularly given the vulnerabilities still present
> > in 11.0
es for unstable,
testing, and backports. I think it is easy to mistake, for example, an
11.0.3+x (prerelease) version in Debian with the 11.0.3 GA release being
distributed by other projects.
Matthias, since you've been handling all of the recent uploads, do you
have specific thoughts or concerns about an upload of 11.0.3-ga?
Thank you,
tony
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, Feb 17, 2019 at 05:48:30PM +0100, Markus Koschany wrote:
> Hi Ingo,
>
> Am 17.02.19 um 16:45 schrieb Ingo Bauersachs:
> > Tony, Markus
> >
> >> [...]
> >> Any thoughts on whether we should focus on fixing javadoc generation or
> >> look at
On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 08:22:14PM +0100, Markus Koschany wrote:
> Am 15.02.19 um 15:42 schrieb tony mancill:
> [...]
> > Any thoughts on whether we should focus on fixing javadoc generation or
> > look at other ways to mitigate the FTBFS?
>
> Like burning all those -doc
On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 10:07:34PM +0100, Markus Koschany wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am 26.01.19 um 20:07 schrieb tony mancill:
> [...]
> > I'm trying to peel the onion and believe that this is a problem in the
> > maven-javadoc-plugin package. I found the same issue for a
On Sun, Feb 03, 2019 at 04:24:02PM +0100, Felix Natter wrote:
> Markus Koschany writes:
>
> > Hi,
>
> hello Markus,
> hello Tony,
>
> > Am 30.01.19 um 20:55 schrieb Felix Natter:
> >> hi Debian-java,
> >>
> >> I would like
On Sun, Jan 27, 2019 at 12:25:35AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Tony,
>
> On Sat, Jan 26, 2019 at 10:52:46AM -0800, tony mancill wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 26, 2019 at 11:11:36AM +0100, Andreas Tille wro
), since it looks like all of these commits will
be part of 3.1.0 [4].
I'm not sure how much time I'll have to dedicate to this over the
weekend and so would be happy if someone fixes it before I get to it.
Cheers,
tony
[1] https://github.com/oracle/opengrok/issues/2629
[2] h
On Sat, Jan 26, 2019 at 11:11:36AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Tony,
>
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 08:23:55PM -0800, tony mancill wrote:
> > I recently patched the jhove package for a similar issue,
> > ...
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/debian/patches/jh
e jaxb-impl on the
classpath while running tests.
Attached are a set of commits that let the package build for me locally.
Cheers,
tony
From f8f5c72b866718e05811b33f8445ee311228da12 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: tony mancill
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2019 20:17:27 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] Add build
resolve this for packages that have runtime
dependences on swt4-gtk's binary packages?
Thank you,
tony
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
ax.servlet:javax.servlet-api:3.1
> instead of javax.servlet:javax.servlet-api:debian (Closes: #915889)
>
> -- Felix Natter Fri, 21 Dec 2018 21:31:46 +0100
>
> The repo is here:
> https://salsa.debian.org/java-team/freeplane/
>
> Could someone please sponsor this
contribution!
Cheers,
tony
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
built locally against the updated jtreg and gone ahead and sponsored
the upload to experimental. Please let me know if you need any
subsequent uploads.
Cheers,
tony
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
1 - 100 of 859 matches
Mail list logo
