Am Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 02:06:06PM +0200 schrieb Thorsten Glaser:
> > Last point, we still have OpenJDK 8 in unstable to help with the
> > bootstrapping
> > of some packages that can't build directly with the latest JDK (more
> > specifically, Kotlin and Scala). Similarly I think we should preserv
Am Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 12:00:42PM +0200 schrieb Emmanuel Bourg:
> Hi all,
Sorry for the late reply, this got backlogged in my inbox.
> The first point is to plan when we'll switch the default JDK to OpenJDK 17.
> The transition has progressed well, with 113 bugs fixed already, but there
> are st
Am Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 03:59:00PM +0100 schrieb Thorsten Glaser:
> Hi Holger,
>
> > and filed against src:debian-security-support, as openjdk-17 seems to be
> > supported and src:debian-security-support's purpose is to documented what's
>
> no, 11 is supported, 17 is just for users to run third-
On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 10:31:30PM +0100, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> I think nobody wants to switch default-jdk to 17 or even not ship
> 11 at all any more or stop supporting it during bullseye’s lifetime.
> Maybe that also was too implicit?
Exactly, the supported Java release for the entire Bullsey
On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 07:17:59PM +0100, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Hi tony,
>
> > source package uploaded to Debian unstable against stretch for a
> > stretch-security upload. I should be able to complete the builds and
> > smoke-tests by the end of the week and will upload once I get the
> > go-
On Sun, May 26, 2019 at 09:13:38PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> The openjdk-8 packages which were unfortunately removed from unstable
> (although
> the issue #915620 only asked for the removal of some binaries), are now again
> in
> NEW, targeting unstable. One of the FTP assistants is objecti
On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 11:18:29AM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Monday, March 25, 2019 02:17:15 PM Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> > On Mon, 25 Mar 2019, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> > > Please remove the tomcat8 package from testing and unstable (not
> > > experimental). This package has been replaced b
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 06:19:08PM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote:
> On 22.06.2016 08:47, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 01:01:14AM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote:
> >> On 22.06.2016 00:43, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> >>> Le 22/06/2016 à
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 01:01:14AM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote:
> On 22.06.2016 00:43, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> > Le 22/06/2016 à 00:28, Markus Koschany a écrit :
> >
> >> Houston, we have a problem. It seems the latest upstream release
> >> requires Java 8 for building JDBC 4. In Jessie even Java
On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 11:23:30PM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote:
> Am 29.03.2016 um 23:01 schrieb Moritz Mühlenhoff:
> > On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 10:03:56PM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote:
> >> The Security Team decided to mark the issues in Jessie as no-dsa because
> >> w
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 02:21:06PM +0100, Markus Koschany wrote:
> Am 14.03.2016 um 23:06 schrieb Moritz Mühlenhoff:
> > On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 11:45:45PM +0100, Markus Koschany wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> as you know Tomcat 6 is affected by new security vu
On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 03:28:01PM +0100, Markus Koschany wrote:
> Please find attached the debdiff for Wheezy. I have tried to backport
> libxstream-java from Jessie to Wheezy but I don't think this is the best
> solution anymore. We would need to backport libjdom2-java as well and
> change the bu
On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 11:45:45PM +0100, Markus Koschany wrote:
> Hi,
>
> as you know Tomcat 6 is affected by new security vulnerabilities that
> are fixed in version 6.0.45. Do you want me to replace the last version
> I sent to you regarding Wheezy with this one or shall I upload version
> 6.0.
On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 06:24:17PM +0100, Markus Koschany wrote:
> Am 18.02.2016 um 18:10 schrieb Emmanuel Bourg:
> > Le 18/02/2016 14:45, Markus Koschany a écrit :
> >
> >> According to [1] Tomcat 6 in Wheezy is still affected by a couple of
> >> security vulnerabilities that were already fixed i
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 07:31:27PM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote:
> Am 22.06.2015 um 07:58 schrieb tony:
> > On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 09:29:26PM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> I am looking for someone who is interested in uploading jackrabbit and
> >> fixing #787316.
> >>
> >> P
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 09:29:16AM -0700, tony mancill wrote:
> On 10/25/2014 06:43 AM, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 08:33:38PM -0700, tony mancill wrote:
> >> On 10/23/2014 01:28 PM, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 02
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 08:33:38PM -0700, tony mancill wrote:
> On 10/23/2014 01:28 PM, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 02:41:55PM +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> I've just uploaded an update of the tomcat6 pack
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 02:41:55PM +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've just uploaded an update of the tomcat6 package that builds only the
> Servlet API (libservlet2.5-java) and no longer the server packages
> (tomcat6, libtomcat6-java, etc). So even if the src:tomcat6 package is
> sti
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 04:37:41PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 02:16:13PM +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> > Le 28/04/2014 13:22, Moritz Muehlenhoff a écrit :
> > > Hi,
> > > I noticed that tomcat8 was uploaded into sid. We still have tomcat6 and
> > > tomca
Matthias Klose schrieb:
>> I'm not familiar with the Java internals, but if we're following that
>> approach
>> it would make sense to upgrade Wheezy to the version in experimental
>> (i.e. 7u15 instead of 7u3).
>
> I won't upload this myself. IcedTea 7-2.3 uses two hotspot versions, one for
> t
Matthias Klose schrieb:
> Am 01.03.2013 04:35, schrieb Moritz Mühlenhoff:
>> Backporting security fixes with Java has turned out to be more of less
>> unfeasible. I tried this once with DSA 2507 and I think that amounted to at
>> least
>> two man days of work for that
Niels Thykier schrieb:
> On 2013-02-17 23:04, Matthias Klose wrote:
>> There is a bug report open for openjdk-6 in wheezy (#675495) and squeeze
>> didn't
>> see any security updates for several months. To summarize, no party
>> involved is
>> capable or willing to provide security updates based
On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 02:53:41PM -0430, Miguel Landaeta wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 1:43 PM, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > currently there's Tomcat 6 and Tomcat 7 in Wheezy. Will 6 be dropped
> > before the Wheezy relese? It would be good to only have one version
> > in Wheezy.
>
> I agree
23 matches
Mail list logo
