Am Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 02:06:06PM +0200 schrieb Thorsten Glaser:
> > Last point, we still have OpenJDK 8 in unstable to help with the
> > bootstrapping
> > of some packages that can't build directly with the latest JDK (more
> > specifically, Kotlin and Scala). Similarly I think we should preserve
> > OpenJDK
> > 11 in unstable after the transition to OpenJDK 17.
>
> Who’s going to maintain that?
>
> For OpenJDK 8 I took over because,
Do we even have to keep 8 around in unstable at this point? If people want to
bootstrap kotlin or scala for a new arch, why can't this happen on a buster
system?
Cheers,
Moritz
