On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 09:29:16AM -0700, tony mancill wrote:
> On 10/25/2014 06:43 AM, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 08:33:38PM -0700, tony mancill wrote:
> >> On 10/23/2014 01:28 PM, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 02:41:55PM +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> >>>> Hi all,
> >>>>
> >>>> I've just uploaded an update of the tomcat6 package that builds only the
> >>>> Servlet API (libservlet2.5-java) and no longer the server packages
> >>>> (tomcat6, libtomcat6-java, etc). So even if the src:tomcat6 package is
> >>>> still part of Jessie we won't have to support the security updates.
> >>>>
> >>>> This change will break two packages:
> >>>> - libjboss-remoting-java: removal pending with jbossas4 (#764250)
> >>>> - tomcat-maven-plugin: no rdeps, low popcon. To be removed or upgraded
> >>>> to the version 2.x to fix the build failure.
> >>>>
> >>>> All the other packages which were relying on tomcat6 have been updated
> >>>> to use tomcat7 or tomcat8.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks, but wasn't the outcome of the discussion in April "Subject:
> >>> Tomcat version for jessie" to only ship tomcat8?
> >>>
> >>> Cheers,
> >>> Moritz
> >>>
> >>
> >> Hello Moritz,
> >>
> >> Yes, this was discussed at one point. However, there was some
> >> subsequent discussion about this during DebConf and as part of this
> >> thread [1]. The conclusion from the Java Team is that tomcat7 is the
> >> right choice for users given the relative newness of tomcat8 and that it
> >> is currently under development.
> >
> > Ok, but then we should remove tomcat8 from testing, so that we don't have
> > two versions of Tomcat in stable again.
>
> As I understand it, the rationale for excluding tomcat8 would be to
> minimize the surface area for security updates. And maybe that's the
> right thing to air for from a security perspective, but I'm not sure
> that it's right for users.
>
> tomcat8 includes libraries that support the latest servlet and JSP
> specifications, so excluding it from jessie seems akin to telling users
> that "Debian stable is for running (this one version of) tomcat, but not
> for developing software."
Anyone developing can install a backport or run testing/unstable.
Given that dealing with 6/7 in wheezy is already problematic enough,
having again two versions again in jessie is not feasible.
Cheers,
Moritz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141029183531.GA3915@pisco.westfalen.local
