Re: log4j version

2003-02-11 Thread Jesse Stockall
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 10:58:51AM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote: > > > > Shouldn't it be liblog4j-java as log4j is the name of the library? > > Well the software is pronounced log for java. It could be named > liblog4j-java too but I can not see why the extra j should be there. > If the package is

Re: log4j version

2003-02-11 Thread Jesse Stockall
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 08:47:25AM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote: > You are very welcome to take it over. > > But before you do, you should contact Jesse Stockall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > that is (according to some of my logs) preparing new packages. Obviously > this seems to hav

Re: log4j version

2003-02-11 Thread Jesse Stockall
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 10:58:51AM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote: > > > > Shouldn't it be liblog4j-java as log4j is the name of the library? > > Well the software is pronounced log for java. It could be named > liblog4j-java too but I can not see why the extra j should be there. > If the package is

Re: log4j version

2003-02-11 Thread Jesse Stockall
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 08:47:25AM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote: > You are very welcome to take it over. > > But before you do, you should contact Jesse Stockall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > that is (according to some of my logs) preparing new packages. Obviously > this seems to hav

Re: Policy change proposal, Re: Bug#176628: sablevm: package incorrctly provides java1-runtime

2003-01-20 Thread Jesse Stockall
On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 09:33:28AM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote: > > > If you have better definitions on how to define java1-runtime and/or > > > java2-runtime, I'm grateful for such propositions. > > > > If AWT / GUI stuff is a particular problem (which is my understanding), > > I think it would ma

Re: Policy change proposal, Re: Bug#176628: sablevm: package incorrctly provides java1-runtime

2003-01-20 Thread Jesse Stockall
On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 09:33:28AM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote: > > > If you have better definitions on how to define java1-runtime and/or > > > java2-runtime, I'm grateful for such propositions. > > > > If AWT / GUI stuff is a particular problem (which is my understanding), > > I think it would ma

Re: java debugging on debian

2002-01-07 Thread Jesse Stockall
On Mon, 2002-01-07 at 08:41, Mike Gratton wrote: > Does anyone what the deal with Blackdown (not yet) releasing 1.3.1 is? > Blackdown has had a 1.3.1 JDK (& JRE) for quite some time. This should get it for you. deb ftp://ftp.tux.org/pub/java/debian woody non-free -- Jess

Re: java debugging on debian

2002-01-07 Thread Jesse Stockall
On Mon, 2002-01-07 at 08:41, Mike Gratton wrote: > Does anyone what the deal with Blackdown (not yet) releasing 1.3.1 is? > Blackdown has had a 1.3.1 JDK (& JRE) for quite some time. This should get it for you. deb ftp://ftp.tux.org/pub/java/debian woody non-free -- Jess

Re: Reg: EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION on JDBC in Java!!!!

2001-10-08 Thread Jesse Stockall
Sun has a list of JDBC drivers @ http://industry.java.sun.com/products/jdbc/drivers We use the I-Net driver for MS-SQL & have never had any prpoblems -- === Jesse Stockall[EMAIL

Re: Reg: EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION on JDBC in Java!!!!

2001-10-08 Thread Jesse Stockall
Sun has a list of JDBC drivers @ http://industry.java.sun.com/products/jdbc/drivers We use the I-Net driver for MS-SQL & have never had any prpoblems -- === Jesse Stockall[EMAIL