On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 10:58:51AM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> > 
> > Shouldn't it be liblog4j-java as log4j is the name of the library?
> 
> Well the software is pronounced log for java. It could be named
> liblog4j-java too but I can not see why the extra j should be there.
>

If the package is named liblog4-java than anyone doing a 
'dpkg -l *log4j*' will not find the package.

Although the extra j is redundant, it is part of the original library's
name and should be kept.

Jesse


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to