On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 10:58:51AM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote: > > > > Shouldn't it be liblog4j-java as log4j is the name of the library? > > Well the software is pronounced log for java. It could be named > liblog4j-java too but I can not see why the extra j should be there. >
If the package is named liblog4-java than anyone doing a 'dpkg -l *log4j*' will not find the package. Although the extra j is redundant, it is part of the original library's name and should be kept. Jesse
