I've sat together with Egon Willighagen who is member of CDK upstream
> team to update the cdk package[1]. So far the switch from ant to maven
> seems to have basically succeeded. However, for some reason it does not
> build modules in the correct sequence and thus we are running
Awesome! Plz let me know if I can answer any questions around dependencies,
or impact of missing dependencies.
Egon
On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 9:35 PM Andrius Merkys wrote:
> Hi Andreas,
>
> On Wed, 20 Nov 2019, 22:19 Andreas Tille, wrote:
>
>> I have no idea what restrictions the lack of cmlxom
Hi all,
are there plans within Debian for the upcoming Java security changes,
which make many unsigned and self-signed applets blocked somewhere in
2014?
Are there options for Debian to become a trusted signer of applets?
Egon
--
Dr E.L. Willighagen
Postdoctoral Researcher
Department of Bioinf
Hi Niels, Onkar,
On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 10:02 AM, Egon Willighagen
wrote:
> I will have a look the JavaDoc cleaning thing now...
I quickly figured out that that would take me more effort, to properly
hook that in the Debian build systems...
I did have a look at compiling 1.4.12 which resul
Hi Niels, Onkar,
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 9:54 AM, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Personally I have no issues with targetting this for experimental; in
> fact I think it makes perfect sense to use experimental for possible
> API/ABI issues[1].
Daniel Leidert and I met up in Utrecht along with some 10 oth
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Niels Thykier wrote:
> The issue is that it fails to clean properly - at least some (java)doc
> files are not cleaned, but also some non-text files (can't remember - I
> didn't pay too much attention to it). I haven't actually investigated
> the failure that deepl
Hi Niels,
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Niels Thykier wrote:
> I "just" read the diff between our current version (1.2.10) and the RFS
> version 1.4.9. Actually, thanks you just made me realize that it FTBFS
> when built twice in a row!
Ah, right! Yes, from 1.2 to 1.4 there are API changes..
NIels,
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 10:04 AM, Niels Thykier wrote:
> On 2012-05-19 14:56, Onkar Shinde wrote:
> It seems that some public methods are changing signature and also that
> some public constants are disappearing in this release (compared to our
> current version).
Which ones are those? Th
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Egon Willighagen
wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 8:32 AM, Onkar Shinde wrote:
>> Latest changelog for reference.
>> cdk (1:1.2.10-1) unstable; urgency=low
>> - Remove modules which do not contain any class files when built - inchi,
&g
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 8:32 AM, Onkar Shinde wrote:
> Latest changelog for reference.
> cdk (1:1.2.10-1) unstable; urgency=low
> - Remove modules which do not contain any class files when built - inchi,
> pdbcml, qsarxml.
The latter two need CMLXOM packaged, I guess. The first one needs
j
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Onkar Shinde wrote:
> When java libraries are packaged in Debian the jar files are named
> -.jar and there is a symlink present with name
> .jar. The reason that I replaced all the versioned name
> in various dependencies with version less name is that the version
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 10:26 AM, Onkar Shinde wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 12:39 PM, Egon Willighagen
> wrote:
>> Can you please file patch 21 and 22 'upstream'? Preferably as Git
>> patches, but the raw Debian patches are fine with me too:
>>
>>
Hi Onkar,
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 6:56 AM, Onkar Shinde wrote:
> I need sponsorship for package cdk 1.2.7-1. The packaging bits are in
> pkg-java svn repository.
Thanx for doing this!
> Latest changelog for reference.
> cdk (1:1.2.7-1) unstable; urgency=low
> * debian/patches
> - series - U
Hi all,
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Egon Willighagen
wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 11:47 AM, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> We would need to package all of its dependencies, so a list of
>> bioclipse's dependencies would be nice. Bonus if you go further and
>>
On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 1:09 AM, Giovanni Mascellani
wrote:
> I made a big mistake with libjgrapht0.8-java: I forgot to rename the
> source package from libjgrapht-java to libjgrapht0.8-java. Fortunately
> the package got in NEW, so I just wrote an email to FTP masters, asking
> for REJECTing it.
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 11:47 AM, Niels Thykier wrote:
> We would need to package all of its dependencies, so a list of
> bioclipse's dependencies would be nice. Bonus if you go further and
> generate a dependency tree.
OK, filed as wishlist report:
http://pele.farmbio.uu.se/cgi-bin/bugzilla/sho
Dear Niels,
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 8:35 AM, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> It's dependencies are listed here:
>> https://elexis.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/elexis/trunk/elexis-developer-
>> resources/doc/developer.textile
>
> Sweet, by the way, you can see its direct dependencies in the manifest:
>
> h
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 12:44 PM, Marcelo Laia wrote:
> Like that there is no need to make that decision for the user, based
> on Debian police (see yours previous comments), this way to upgrade
> jabref is not the Debian way, so, I will not upgrade that package
> manually and I believe that this i
I have been out of the Debian
Java loop for quite a long time now, and cc-ed the list, hoping they
can provide further information.
Kind regards,
Egon Willighagen
--
Post-doc @ Uppsala University
Proteochemometrics / Bioclipse Group of Prof. Jarl Wikberg
Homepage: http://egonw.git
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 11:53 AM, Jan-Pascal van
Best wrote:
> Torsten Werner wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 12:53 PM, Vincent Fourmond
>> wrote:
>>> I'm wondering: would it be a good idea to remove everything but to
>>> leave a dummy file in pkg-java/trunk/solr stating that the packaging
>>>
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 10:28 AM, Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This does not work in a pristine build environment (such as one set up
> by pbuilder) because the DLJ has to be accepted, which can't work in a
> non-interactive environment.
>
> How do you cope with that? Use a patche
On Jan 29, 2008 5:18 PM, Eric Lavarde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I can log a bug along these lines if you want but someone will have to
> dig into it, because, without error message, I don't know where to start.
You could start by updating this page:
http://developer.classpath.org/mediation/Fre
On Jan 7, 2008 10:22 AM, Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/1/7, Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > I understand, but do we really have other possible ways?
>
> Not moving packages that work only with icedtea to main at the moment.
What are the timelines of IcedTea and gcj with re
On Thursday 02 November 2006 23:07, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Petter Reinholdtsen writes:
> > The most important feature is java applet support. Some of the
> > important test cases are listed on
> > http://wiki.debian.org/DebianEdu/JavaInDebianEdu>. Last time I
> > tested, few of them were working
On Sunday 22 October 2006 18:02, Simon Urbanek wrote:
> The bad news is that JGR doesn't quite
> work. Although I was able to start JGR with GIJ, its Swing
> implementation seems to be incomplete/incompatible such that I get
> tons of exceptions on the console that fail in the middle of the GIJ
> S
On Sunday 22 October 2006 13:11, Andrew Haley wrote:
> > diff -ru rJava-orig/src/Makevars.in rJava/src/Makevars.in
> > --- rJava-orig/src/Makevars.in 2006-10-11 01:52:30.0 +0200
> > +++ rJava/src/Makevars.in 2006-10-22 12:39:36.0 +0200
> > @@ -14,5 +14,5 @@
> > jri:
>
On Sunday 22 October 2006 11:51, Andrew Haley wrote:
> > But it fails because of this call:
> >
> > /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.4.2-gcj-4.1-1.4.2.0/bin/javac -target 1.4 -source
> > 1.4 -target 1.4 -source 1.4 -classpath src/JRI.jar -d examples
> > examples/rtest.java
> >
> > Note the duplicate '-t
cc: debian-java -> I need a bit of help here, see below
On Wednesday 11 October 2006 15:48, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> | > Unfortunately, JGR is still somewhat outside Debian as it wants Sun's
> | > Java JDK so I don't think I'll ever package it directly. Now, if
> | > someone wanted to outside
On Thursday 11 September 2003 09:37, Mark Howard wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 10:33:39PM +0200, John Leuner wrote:
> > I feel that despite whatever decisions we make about free and non-free
> > VMs and tools etc, we should firstly pay attention to simply compiling
> > our software with free too
On Thursday 11 September 2003 09:37, Mark Howard wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 10:33:39PM +0200, John Leuner wrote:
> > I feel that despite whatever decisions we make about free and non-free
> > VMs and tools etc, we should firstly pay attention to simply compiling
> > our software with free too
On Thursday 07 August 2003 12:54, Paolo Ariano wrote:
> Il gio, 2003-08-07 alle 11:43, Egon Willighagen ha scritto:
> > I would suggest to apt-get source of some Java application and check how
> > that does it... e.g. Jmol on mentors.debian.net, which is not in Debian
> > itse
Hi all,
KDE has Java bindings. There does not seem to be a Debian package for these
Java bindings... or I could not find them. (Are there?)
Ofcourse I could download the kdebindings-3.1.3.tar.bz2 package... but does
anyone have experience in using and compiling these in combination with the
b
On Friday 08 August 2003 15:31, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 03:26:34PM +0200, Egon Willighagen wrote:
> > Right... and I understood from Hein's email that the sablevm package
> > does this upon upgrade...
> >
> > Is that a bug?
>
> If sabl
On Friday 08 August 2003 15:15, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 02:54:56PM +0200, Egon Willighagen wrote:
> > On Friday 08 August 2003 14:26, Hein Meling wrote:
> > > Every time I do an update, and there is a new version of sablevm (I
> > > think), the
On Friday 08 August 2003 14:26, Hein Meling wrote:
> Every time I do an update, and there is a new version of sablevm (I
> think), the alternatives system returns to "auto" mode and selects sablevm
> as the default JVM, even though I have previously (manually) selected
> j2sdk1.4 as the default.
Hi all,
KDE has Java bindings. There does not seem to be a Debian package for these
Java bindings... or I could not find them. (Are there?)
Ofcourse I could download the kdebindings-3.1.3.tar.bz2 package... but does
anyone have experience in using and compiling these in combination with the
b
On Friday 08 August 2003 15:31, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 03:26:34PM +0200, Egon Willighagen wrote:
> > Right... and I understood from Hein's email that the sablevm package
> > does this upon upgrade...
> >
> > Is that a bug?
>
> If sabl
On Friday 08 August 2003 15:15, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 02:54:56PM +0200, Egon Willighagen wrote:
> > On Friday 08 August 2003 14:26, Hein Meling wrote:
> > > Every time I do an update, and there is a new version of sablevm (I
> > > think), the
On Friday 08 August 2003 14:26, Hein Meling wrote:
> Every time I do an update, and there is a new version of sablevm (I
> think), the alternatives system returns to "auto" mode and selects sablevm
> as the default JVM, even though I have previously (manually) selected
> j2sdk1.4 as the default.
On Thursday 07 August 2003 12:54, Paolo Ariano wrote:
> Il gio, 2003-08-07 alle 11:43, Egon Willighagen ha scritto:
> > I would suggest to apt-get source of some Java application and check how
> > that does it... e.g. Jmol on mentors.debian.net, which is not in Debian
> > itse
On Thursday 07 August 2003 11:28, Paolo Ariano wrote:
> reading the debian-new-maint-guide the first problem is to use:
> dh_make obviously ... there is no makefile :|
>
> so is there some document that i didn't find and i've to read it (or
> probably i've not read very well the others) but:
>
> wh
On Thursday 07 August 2003 11:28, Paolo Ariano wrote:
> reading the debian-new-maint-guide the first problem is to use:
> dh_make obviously ... there is no makefile :|
>
> so is there some document that i didn't find and i've to read it (or
> probably i've not read very well the others) but:
>
> wh
On Thursday 10 April 2003 04:53, Michael Hackett wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Apr 2003 08:50:15 +0200
> Egon Willighagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > - or maybe even a CD image as an add on for Debian (including the
> > Blackdown stuff)
> > - a Build-Java-software-on-Debian-
On Wednesday 09 April 2003 22:01, Mark Howard wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-04-09 at 07:50, Egon Willighagen wrote:
> > Are there other people interested in setting up a Debian/Alioth project
> > that should centralize the various Debian/Java efforts? This project
> > would involve
Hi all,
more and more Java software is getting packaged as Debian binaries.
Which I think is excellent, being a Debian user writing Java software.
My main problem now and then is, to see what Debian all has to offer,
which is a lot, actually too much for me to comprehend. There is the
Blackdown
Op donderdag 27 februari 2003 16:54, schreef Ola Lundqvist:
> > Packages that contain a runtime conforming to the Java 1.1
> > specification should provide java1-runtime. Packages that
> > contain a runtime conforming to the Java 2 specification
> > should provide java2-runtime. If a pack
Op vrijdag 28 februari 2003 23:02, schreef David Jardine:
> > We will now create the necessary links typing this into the
> > console:
> >
> > $ ln -s /usr/local/bin/j2sdk1.4.1_01/bin* /usr/bin
>
> Why does it have to be moved? Doesn't this mess up
> the Debian packaging system? W
Op donderdag 27 februari 2003 16:54, schreef Ola Lundqvist:
> > Packages that contain a runtime conforming to the Java 1.1
> > specification should provide java1-runtime. Packages that
> > contain a runtime conforming to the Java 2 specification
> > should provide java2-runtime. If a pack
Op vrijdag 28 februari 2003 23:02, schreef David Jardine:
> > We will now create the necessary links typing this into the
> > console:
> >
> > $ ln -s /usr/local/bin/j2sdk1.4.1_01/bin* /usr/bin
>
> Why does it have to be moved? Doesn't this mess up
> the Debian packaging system? W
On Thursday 02 January 2003 22:36, Joe Phillips wrote:
> On Tue, 2002-12-31 at 17:53, T. Alexander Popiel wrote:
> > Thus, the API is in the end-user docs, not just the developer docs.
> > I suppose that one could argue that anyone trying to use ant for
> > their own programs (instead of just using
On Thursday 02 January 2003 22:36, Joe Phillips wrote:
> On Tue, 2002-12-31 at 17:53, T. Alexander Popiel wrote:
> > Thus, the API is in the end-user docs, not just the developer docs.
> > I suppose that one could argue that anyone trying to use ant for
> > their own programs (instead of just using
On Tuesday 12 November 2002 21:23, David Shepherd wrote:
> I've just tried installing the j2sdk1.4 and j2re1.4 packages from a
> blackdown mirror and got the following conflict with 1.3 which is
> already installed.
>
> Anyone else had this error and fixed it?
>
> I don't want to remove j2sdk1.3 as
On Tuesday 12 November 2002 21:23, David Shepherd wrote:
> I've just tried installing the j2sdk1.4 and j2re1.4 packages from a
> blackdown mirror and got the following conflict with 1.3 which is
> already installed.
>
> Anyone else had this error and fixed it?
>
> I don't want to remove j2sdk1.3 as
On Sunday 20 October 2002 11:37, Arash Bijanzadeh wrote:
> On Sunday 20 October 2002 12:48, Egon Willighagen wrote:
> > On Sunday 20 October 2002 08:38, Arash Bijanzadeh wrote:
> > > Can I use kdevelop for my java project? Any one have experience with
> > > this?
>
On Sunday 20 October 2002 08:38, Arash Bijanzadeh wrote:
> Can I use kdevelop for my java project? Any one have experience with this?
Yes, but you cannot make KDE/Java programs at this moment, because the
kdebindings for Java are not yet available for Debian...
Egon
point to some info on how to get them?
Looking forward to any ideas/suggestions/etc,
kind regards,
Egon Willighagen
PS. If I get it to run, I'll write an article about KDE/Java development with
Gideon in LinuxFocus. It is really great software!
point to some info on how to get them?
Looking forward to any ideas/suggestions/etc,
kind regards,
Egon Willighagen
PS. If I get it to run, I'll write an article about KDE/Java development with
Gideon in LinuxFocus. It is really great software!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PRO
On Sunday 22 September 2002 12:44, Mark Howard wrote:
> Hi,
> We're working (upstream) on a java program which includes multiple
> l10n files, based on ResourceBundles. The java documentation on the
> placement of these is very sketchy, but we think that the only
> requirement is that they reside
On Sunday 22 September 2002 12:44, Mark Howard wrote:
> Hi,
> We're working (upstream) on a java program which includes multiple
> l10n files, based on ResourceBundles. The java documentation on the
> placement of these is very sketchy, but we think that the only
> requirement is that they resid
On Monday 13 May 2002 03:22, Jim Pick wrote:
> Sounds like Debian could use the same solution for gcj that Debian uses
> for emacs -> just distribute the .java files and do the ahead-of-time
> compilation (.java to .so) at install time. Is this automatic enough
> under gcj so that this could that
On Monday 13 May 2002 03:22, Jim Pick wrote:
> Sounds like Debian could use the same solution for gcj that Debian uses
> for emacs -> just distribute the .java files and do the ahead-of-time
> compilation (.java to .so) at install time. Is this automatic enough
> under gcj so that this could that
On Sunday 12 May 2002 22:00, Andrew Pimlott wrote:
> On Sun, May 12, 2002 at 09:40:05PM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> > I disagree on that class files should be placed in a -dev package for the
> > same reason as I want every jar file to be placed in /usr/share/java
> > (maybe with an exception for
On Sunday 12 May 2002 21:32, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> On Sun, May 12, 2002 at 09:13:35PM +0200, Egon Willighagen wrote:
> > On Sunday 12 May 2002 21:11, Egon Willighagen wrote:
> > > Only if your binary package can run with free virtual machines (like
> > > kaffe, libgcj,
On Sunday 12 May 2002 21:11, Egon Willighagen wrote:
> Only if your binary package can run with free virtual machines (like kaffe,
> libgcj, ORP and KissMe), it may go into main. Otherwise, it must go into
> non-free, or in contrib if your package itself is free.
Better:
Only if yo
On Sunday 12 May 2002 17:11, Nic Ferrier wrote:
> Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If your binary package can run only with non-free virtual machines
> (the only free Java virtual machine seems to be kaffe - and the one
> included in libgcj), it cannot go to main. If your package i
On Sunday 12 May 2002 22:00, Andrew Pimlott wrote:
> On Sun, May 12, 2002 at 09:40:05PM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> > I disagree on that class files should be placed in a -dev package for the
> > same reason as I want every jar file to be placed in /usr/share/java
> > (maybe with an exception fo
On Sunday 12 May 2002 21:32, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> On Sun, May 12, 2002 at 09:13:35PM +0200, Egon Willighagen wrote:
> > On Sunday 12 May 2002 21:11, Egon Willighagen wrote:
> > > Only if your binary package can run with free virtual machines (like
> > > kaffe, libgcj,
On Sunday 12 May 2002 21:11, Egon Willighagen wrote:
> Only if your binary package can run with free virtual machines (like kaffe,
> libgcj, ORP and KissMe), it may go into main. Otherwise, it must go into
> non-free, or in contrib if your package itself is free.
Better:
Only if yo
On Sunday 12 May 2002 17:11, Nic Ferrier wrote:
> Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If your binary package can run only with non-free virtual machines
> (the only free Java virtual machine seems to be kaffe - and the one
> included in libgcj), it cannot go to main. If your package
On donderdag 25 april 2002 16:44, Greg Wilkins wrote:
> Are there any Debian java developers interested in helping me package
> the Jetty WWW Server and Servlet container?
>
> Jetty is 100% java and has it's own HTTP/1.1 www server, so it does
> not need apache etc. While I know the basics of maki
On donderdag 25 april 2002 16:44, Greg Wilkins wrote:
> Are there any Debian java developers interested in helping me package
> the Jetty WWW Server and Servlet container?
>
> Jetty is 100% java and has it's own HTTP/1.1 www server, so it does
> not need apache etc. While I know the basics of mak
Hi all,
to get J2SDK for linux running on my machine, i had to make a symbolic link:
/usr/lib# ln -s libstdc++-libc6.1-2.so.3 libstdc++-libc6.1-1.so.2
Is there a more elegant way?
regards,
Egon
Hi all,
to get J2SDK for linux running on my machine, i had to make a symbolic link:
/usr/lib# ln -s libstdc++-libc6.1-2.so.3 libstdc++-libc6.1-1.so.2
Is there a more elegant way?
regards,
Egon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
On Saturday 9 February 2002 15:51, Rick Lutowski wrote:
> Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> > Kenneth Pronovici <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > If you'd prefer to take this discussion off the list, that's fine,
> > > too.
> >
> > I do not know for everybody but I am very interresting in that
> > d
On Saturday 9 February 2002 15:51, Rick Lutowski wrote:
> Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> > Kenneth Pronovici <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > If you'd prefer to take this discussion off the list, that's fine,
> > > too.
> >
> > I do not know for everybody but I am very interresting in that
> >
> On Tue, Oct 23, 2001 at 11:04:47AM +0200, Egon Willighagen wrote:
> > Is it "legal" to have (I am thinking Java here):
> >
> > - A GPL-ed program that uses
> > a LPGL-ed libraries that uses
> > a "Apache Public License"-ed library
> &
Hi all,
i have been browsing the archives but i could not find a definate answer:
Is it "legal" to have (I am thinking Java here):
- A GPL-ed program that uses
a LPGL-ed libraries that uses
a "Apache Public License"-ed library
The be precise, i am considering packaging a GPL-ed tool that u
Hi all,
i have been browsing the archives but i could not find a definate answer:
Is it "legal" to have (I am thinking Java here):
- A GPL-ed program that uses
a LPGL-ed libraries that uses
a "Apache Public License"-ed library
The be precise, i am considering packaging a GPL-ed tool that
On Friday 19 October 2001 03:26, Kevin A. Burton wrote:
> "Anthony Green" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Guillaume wrote:
> > > I would like to present jpackage project here, as it seems we have
> > > similar goals:
> >
> > What would be very interesting (to me, at least!) is to see packages with
On Friday 19 October 2001 03:26, Kevin A. Burton wrote:
> "Anthony Green" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Guillaume wrote:
> > > I would like to present jpackage project here, as it seems we have
> > > similar goals:
> >
> > What would be very interesting (to me, at least!) is to see packages with
On Wednesday 17 October 2001 20:25, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
> Hello folks.
>
> I would like to present jpackage project here, as it seems we have similar
> goals:
> 1 - to provide packaged java application for linux distributions
> 2 - to establish a clean fhs-compliant policy for them.
> See proje
On Wednesday 17 October 2001 20:25, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
> Hello folks.
>
> I would like to present jpackage project here, as it seems we have similar
> goals:
> 1 - to provide packaged java application for linux distributions
> 2 - to establish a clean fhs-compliant policy for them.
> See proj
about 2 weeks ago I installed the new Debian packages in "Incoming"
for Java1.3... works great. But now my Java3D system no longer works...
Which is probably caused by the fact that the libraries are no longer
in the correct dir:
/usr/lib/j2re1.3/lib/i386/libJ3D.so
/usr/lib/j2re1.3/lib/i386/libj3
about 2 weeks ago I installed the new Debian packages in "Incoming"
for Java1.3... works great. But now my Java3D system no longer works...
Which is probably caused by the fact that the libraries are no longer
in the correct dir:
/usr/lib/j2re1.3/lib/i386/libJ3D.so
/usr/lib/j2re1.3/lib/i386/libj
On Monday 08 October 2001 08:17, Peter Makholm wrote:
> Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I was under the impression from the discussions this spring that the
> > Blackdown folks had got explicit permission from Sun for Debian to
> > distribute the JDK in non-free.
>
> If such permission
On Monday 08 October 2001 08:17, Peter Makholm wrote:
> Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I was under the impression from the discussions this spring that the
> > Blackdown folks had got explicit permission from Sun for Debian to
> > distribute the JDK in non-free.
>
> If such permissio
On Tuesday 25 September 2001 20:56, Michael Schlueter wrote:
> Now I will start with argouml
Good. Can't wait to file al those bugs and missing features in it
that i've got piled up over the last one and a half year :)
Egon
On Tuesday 25 September 2001 20:56, Michael Schlueter wrote:
> Now I will start with argouml
Good. Can't wait to file al those bugs and missing features in it
that i've got piled up over the last one and a half year :)
Egon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "u
On Wednesday 19 September 2001 16:58, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 03:33:59PM +0200, Egon Willighagen wrote:
> > On Tuesday 18 September 2001 14:44, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> > > Like, CLASSPATH=$CLASSPATH:$INTERNALCLASSPATH before running
> > > th
On Wednesday 19 September 2001 16:58, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 03:33:59PM +0200, Egon Willighagen wrote:
> > On Tuesday 18 September 2001 14:44, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> > > Like, CLASSPATH=$CLASSPATH:$INTERNALCLASSPATH before running
> > > th
On Wednesday 19 September 2001 09:22, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 02:59:10PM -0700, Stephen Zander wrote:
> > The following just entered .../Incoming.
>
> Great! Good work guys!
I cannot agree more!
Egon
On Tuesday 18 September 2001 14:44, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> Like, CLASSPATH=$CLASSPATH:$INTERNALCLASSPATH before running
> the real jvm.
I'm not really in favor of a system wide classpath; i prefer the current
system where /usr/bin/program deals with this...
But if the majority prefers it
On Wednesday 19 September 2001 09:22, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 02:59:10PM -0700, Stephen Zander wrote:
> > The following just entered .../Incoming.
>
> Great! Good work guys!
I cannot agree more!
Egon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubs
On Tuesday 18 September 2001 14:44, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> Like, CLASSPATH=$CLASSPATH:$INTERNALCLASSPATH before running
> the real jvm.
I'm not really in favor of a system wide classpath; i prefer the current
system where /usr/bin/program deals with this...
But if the majority prefers it
On Sunday 16 September 2001 13:00, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 16, 2001 at 12:32:51AM -0500, Ben Burton wrote:
> Ok. Lets standardize on the libfoo[version]-java names.
I really like to comment that i do not think we should punish those
who complied to the current Java policy, and use
lib-f
On Sunday 16 September 2001 13:00, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 16, 2001 at 12:32:51AM -0500, Ben Burton wrote:
> Ok. Lets standardize on the libfoo[version]-java names.
I really like to comment that i do not think we should punish those
who complied to the current Java policy, and use
lib-
On Saturday 15 September 2001 19:29, Ben Burton wrote:
> Okay. Note that java policy states that "Libraries packages must be named
> lib-XXX-java."
>
> Below we see an approximate list of all java library packages available in
> debian. One observes that more than *half* of them are named
> "libX
On Saturday 15 September 2001 19:29, Ben Burton wrote:
> Okay. Note that java policy states that "Libraries packages must be named
> lib-XXX-java."
>
> Below we see an approximate list of all java library packages available in
> debian. One observes that more than *half* of them are named
> "lib
On Wednesday 12 September 2001 17:30, Ben Burton wrote:
> > What about using XML instead?
>
> The initial reason for suggesting plain text was that (1) it seemed like
> it would handle the task well enough, i.e. I didn't see a natural tree
> structure on the data, and (2) it's easier to inspect and
On Wednesday 12 September 2001 17:30, Ben Burton wrote:
> > What about using XML instead?
>
> The initial reason for suggesting plain text was that (1) it seemed like
> it would handle the task well enough, i.e. I didn't see a natural tree
> structure on the data, and (2) it's easier to inspect an
1 - 100 of 158 matches
Mail list logo
