On Thursday 02 January 2003 22:36, Joe Phillips wrote: > On Tue, 2002-12-31 at 17:53, T. Alexander Popiel wrote: > > Thus, the API is in the end-user docs, not just the developer docs. > > I suppose that one could argue that anyone trying to use ant for > > their own programs (instead of just using it as an incidental tool > > for building someone else's program) should install an ant-dev package, > > too... but that seems slightly strange to me, since the person is > > still acting as an end-user for the tool, instead of incorporating > > it into their program. > > While you are correct in saying that in some cases, in order to use ant > you need to extend it, I do feel that by extending ant, you then become > an ant developer.
Mmmm... making a custom task is not really being Ant development... > IMHO, it would be appropriate to have a separate package for those > intending to extend ant as opposed to use it as-is. But anyway, what about libx packages? Those are libraries too. Where is the API documentation of those packages? It seems exactly like that... Egon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
