On Friday 08 August 2003 15:31, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 03:26:34PM +0200, Egon Willighagen wrote:
> > Right... and I understood from Hein's email that the sablevm package
> > does this upon upgrade...
> >
> > Is that a bug?
>
> If sablevm does something to reset a manually selected alternative, then
> yes, that is a serious bug. I have not checked whether this is true.
I've just had a look at sablevm's postinst... which installs the
update-alternative entry for java... and it does not seem to do this...
(so no bug):
update-alternatives \
--install /usr/bin/java java /usr/bin/java-sablevm 350 \
--slave $man/java.1.gz java.1.gz $man/java-sablevm.1.gz
Hein, can you send the output of:
> update-alternatives --display java
Egon
