Re: RFS: eclipse-cdt-pkg-config

2012-03-11 Thread Jakub Adam
Hi Niels, I see this have (apparently) been left unanswered for a while. Is this RFS still relevant and if so, how do did you obtain a tarball for it? Upstream does not appear to have tarballs nor svn tags. The best I could find was their binary releases at [1], which suggests there are "multi

Re: RFS: eclipse-cdt-pkg-config

2012-03-11 Thread Niels Thykier
On 2011-11-07 18:39, Jakub Adam wrote: > Dear java packagers, > > I am looking for a sponsor for package "eclipse-cdt-pkg-config". > > * Package name: eclipse-cdt-pkg-config >Version : 0.5.3-1 >Upstream Author : Petri Tuononen > * URL : > http://code.google.com/p

Re: RFS: eclipse-mylyn [uploaded]

2012-03-11 Thread Niels Thykier
On 2012-03-11 16:45, Jakub Adam wrote: > Hi Niels, > First off, uploaded and tagged. :) >> The pristine-tar branch was out of date and the regenerated tarball >> (debian/get-orig-source) generates some different binary files, so I can >> compile it[1]. > > what do you mean by "out of date"? De

Re: ITS: eclipse [uploaded]

2012-03-11 Thread Niels Thykier
On 2012-03-11 17:17, Jakub Adam wrote: > Hi Niels, > >> Do you have a pristine-tar branch or so? So far, regenerating the >> tarball with buildSDKSource.sh seems to hang (more precisely, the cvs >> checkout). > > Pushed pristine-tar branch. > Thanks, > Thanks for sponsoring > > Jakub > >

Re: ITS: eclipse (new upstream release)

2012-03-11 Thread Jakub Adam
Hi Niels, Do you have a pristine-tar branch or so? So far, regenerating the tarball with buildSDKSource.sh seems to hang (more precisely, the cvs checkout). Pushed pristine-tar branch. Thanks for sponsoring Jakub -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subj

Re: RFS: eclipse-mylyn (2nd try)

2012-03-11 Thread Jakub Adam
Hi Niels, The pristine-tar branch was out of date and the regenerated tarball (debian/get-orig-source) generates some different binary files, so I can compile it[1]. what do you mean by "out of date"? Delta file for upstream/3.6.5 is pushed into pristine-tar branch and I was able to successful

Re: ITS: eclipse (new upstream release)

2012-03-11 Thread Niels Thykier
On 2012-03-11 15:00, Jakub Adam wrote: > Dear java packagers, > > I am looking for a sponsor for package "eclipse". > > * Package name: eclipse >Version : 3.7.2-1 >Upstream Author : The Eclipse project > * URL : http://www.eclipse.org > * License : EPL-1

RFS: eclipse (new upstream release)

2012-03-11 Thread Jakub Adam
Dear java packagers, I am looking for a sponsor for package "eclipse". * Package name: eclipse Version : 3.7.2-1 Upstream Author : The Eclipse project * URL : http://www.eclipse.org * License : EPL-1.0 Section : devel It builds those binary pa

Re: RFS: eclipse-cdt-qt

2012-03-11 Thread Niels Thykier
On 2012-02-02 22:41, Jakub Adam wrote: > Hi, > >> This license in itself is discriminating against users, so it has to go >> in non-free unless we can obtain it under a better license. > > for completeness I paste here a link to analysis I got from debian-legal > [1] > (nothing much new there). I

Re: RFS: icu4j-4.4 [uploaded]

2012-03-11 Thread Niels Thykier
On 2012-03-10 23:39, Jakub Adam wrote: > Dear java packagers, > > I am looking for a sponsor for package "icu4j-4.4". > > * Package name: icu4j-4.4 >Version : 4.4.2.2-1 >Upstream Author : IBM and contributors > * URL : http://www.icu-project.org/ > * License