Re: What should I do on FTBFS on hppa against gcj?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2010-09-01 12:14, Thomas Koch wrote: > Hi, > > regarding Bug 594970[1], what should I do? The package FTBFS about an > @override annotation. Apperently @override is a little more complicate.[2] > It seems, that gcj does implement @Override a lit

Re: Clojure versioning

Hello Peter, This looks great, please commit it in the main tree. We should work towards a new release for next week, I still have a few things I want to add to mh_make before I can do a combined release of maven-debian-helper and maven-repo-helper. Ludovic Le 01/09/2010 18:07, Peter Colli

Re: What should I do on FTBFS on hppa against gcj?

On Wed Sep 01 16:36, Torsten Werner wrote: > Hi Thomas, > > Am 01.09.2010 12:14, schrieb Thomas Koch: > > I thought, that hppa should also use openjdk? Can I just ignore the bug or > > should I exclude hppa, can I build-conflict with gcj :-)? > > feel free to ignore hppa bugs. It is no longer a

Re: Clojure versioning

On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 06:07:29PM +0100, Peter Collingbourne wrote: > One idea is to have a > .mk file in /usr/share/cdbs/1/class which defines a clojure.version > environment variable in DEB_MAVEN_ARGS and declares a substvar, say > clojure:Depends. The individual package would then be responsib

Re: What should I do on FTBFS on hppa against gcj?

Hi Thomas, Am 01.09.2010 12:14, schrieb Thomas Koch: > I thought, that hppa should also use openjdk? Can I just ignore the bug or > should I exclude hppa, can I build-conflict with gcj :-)? feel free to ignore hppa bugs. It is no longer a release architecture. Cheers, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRI

What should I do on FTBFS on hppa against gcj?

Hi, regarding Bug 594970[1], what should I do? The package FTBFS about an @override annotation. Apperently @override is a little more complicate.[2] It seems, that gcj does implement @Override a little bit different. Now is this a bug in gcj or in my package? I checked my package's sourcecode. A