Hi, regarding Bug 594970[1], what should I do? The package FTBFS about an @override annotation. Apperently @override is a little more complicate.[2] It seems, that gcj does implement @Override a little bit different. Now is this a bug in gcj or in my package? I checked my package's sourcecode. AFAIK the class method public synchronized void close() throws IOException does indeed _IMPLEMENT_ the interface void close() throws IOException; and also eclipse does not see any problem with this.
I thought, that hppa should also use openjdk? Can I just ignore the bug or should I exclude hppa, can I build-conflict with gcj :-)? [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=594970 [2] http://blogs.sun.com/ahe/entry/override and http://blogs.sun.com/ahe/entry/override_snafu Thank you, Thomas Koch, http://www.koch.ro -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201009011214.21653.tho...@koch.ro
