Hi, regarding Bug 594970[1], what should I do? The package FTBFS about an @override annotation. Apperently @override is a little more complicate.[2] It seems, that gcj does implement @Override a little bit different. Now is this a bug in gcj or in my package? I checked my package's sourcecode. AFAIK the class method public synchronized void close() throws IOException does indeed _IMPLEMENT_ the interface void close() throws IOException; and also eclipse does not see any problem with this.
I thought, that hppa should also use openjdk? Can I just ignore the bug or should I exclude hppa, can I build-conflict with gcj :-)? [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=594970 [2] http://blogs.sun.com/ahe/entry/override and http://blogs.sun.com/ahe/entry/override_snafu Thank you, Thomas Koch, http://www.koch.ro -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
