-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 2010-09-01 12:14, Thomas Koch wrote: > Hi, > > regarding Bug 594970[1], what should I do? The package FTBFS about an > @override annotation. Apperently @override is a little more complicate.[2] > It seems, that gcj does implement @Override a little bit different. > Now is this a bug in gcj or in my package? I checked my package's sourcecode. > AFAIK the class method > public synchronized void close() throws IOException > does indeed _IMPLEMENT_ the interface > void close() throws IOException; > and also eclipse does not see any problem with this. > > I thought, that hppa should also use openjdk? Can I just ignore the bug or > should I exclude hppa, can I build-conflict with gcj :-)? > > [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=594970 > [2] http://blogs.sun.com/ahe/entry/override and > http://blogs.sun.com/ahe/entry/override_snafu > > Thank you, > > Thomas Koch, http://www.koch.ro > >
Hi I believe the semantics of @Override changed between 1.5 and 6; e.g. it is acceptable to use @Override in 6 in some cases that is not in 1.5. Have you tried asking eclipse to compile it as 1.5 source (by default it will use 6 if you have openjdk-6 or sun-java6). ~Niels -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEAREIAAYFAkx+wyEACgkQVCqoiq1YlqwsTQCfTY69dA48oZRddBQMh+h5FUPK XPEAoIXwXxYqKg6gMzaj4yL3e9zHb755 =qtPq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c7ec322.1090...@thykier.net
