Re: Re: Where is libjawt.so located ?

2009-09-02 Thread Mathieu Malaterre
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 5:56 PM, Dominique Belhachemi wrote: >> http://packages.debian.org/search?suite=sid&searchon=contents&keywords=libjawt.so > > I am wondering if there is a transition ongoing from 'powerpc' to 'ppc' or > vice versa ? May I also jump in and ask about the difference in between

Re: Re: Where is libjawt.so located ?

2009-09-02 Thread Dominique Belhachemi
> http://packages.debian.org/search?suite=sid&searchon=contents&keywords=libjawt.so I am wondering if there is a transition ongoing from 'powerpc' to 'ppc' or vice versa ? These packages are using 'ppc' /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/jre/lib/ppc/libjawt.so openjdk-6-dbg /usr/lib/g

Re: Where is libjawt.so located ?

2009-09-02 Thread Mathieu Malaterre
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 1:35 PM, Onkar Shinde wrote: > On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 2:45 PM, Mathieu > Malaterre wrote: >> Hi there, >> >>  We are currently working on the VTK package, after a report of FTBS: >> >> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=541891 >> >>  We changed >> >>  /usr/lib/j

Bug#544680: [java-common] "update-java-alternatives --plugin -s java-6-sun" fails to update iceweasel-javaplugin.so alternative

2009-09-02 Thread Zoran Dzelajlija
Package: java-common Version: 0.33 Severity: normal --- Please enter the report below this line. --- [12:19] ~ => sudo update-java-alternatives --plugin -s java-6-sun burek Using '/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-sun/jre/lib/amd64/libnpjp2.s

Re: Where is libjawt.so located ?

2009-09-02 Thread Onkar Shinde
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 2:45 PM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > Hi there, > >  We are currently working on the VTK package, after a report of FTBS: > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=541891 > >  We changed > >  /usr/lib/jvm/default-java/jre/lib/$(ARCH)/libjawt.so > > into > >  /usr/lib

Re: Where is libjawt.so located ?

2009-09-02 Thread Paul Wise
http://packages.debian.org/search?suite=sid&searchon=contents&keywords=libjawt.so -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Where is libjawt.so located ?

2009-09-02 Thread Mathieu Malaterre
Hi there, We are currently working on the VTK package, after a report of FTBS: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=541891 We changed /usr/lib/jvm/default-java/jre/lib/$(ARCH)/libjawt.so into /usr/lib/jvm/default-java/jre/lib/$(CPU)/libjawt.so But this is not the proper so

Re: FTBFS of libjogl-java on armel

2009-09-02 Thread Sylvestre Ledru
Le mercredi 02 septembre 2009 à 14:22 +0530, Onkar Shinde a écrit : > On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 12:58 PM, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > > Le mardi 28 juillet 2009 à 20:29 +0530, Onkar Shinde a écrit : > >> According to following changelog entry, the build of javadoc was > >> disabled on armel to fix BTFS o

Re: FTBFS of libjogl-java on armel

2009-09-02 Thread Onkar Shinde
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 12:58 PM, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > Le mardi 28 juillet 2009 à 20:29 +0530, Onkar Shinde a écrit : >> According to following changelog entry, the build of javadoc was >> disabled on armel to fix BTFS of libjogl-java. >> >> libjogl-java (1.1.1+dak1-5) unstable; urgency=low >>  

Versioned Dependencies (Was: Re: libjgrapht0.6-java_0.6.0-7_amd64.changes is NEWW)

2009-09-02 Thread Matthew Johnson
On Wed Sep 02 08:46, Michael Koch wrote: > IMO a possible solution would be to have two (or more) packages and let other > packages using jgrapht (Build-)Depend on the version they need. E.g. > libjgrapht-java > could always be the latest API and libjgrapht0.6-java is an older API which > some >

Re: FTBFS of libjogl-java on armel

2009-09-02 Thread Sylvestre Ledru
Le mardi 28 juillet 2009 à 20:29 +0530, Onkar Shinde a écrit : > According to following changelog entry, the build of javadoc was > disabled on armel to fix BTFS of libjogl-java. > > libjogl-java (1.1.1+dak1-5) unstable; urgency=low > . >* Standards-Version updated to version 3.8.1 >* Dis