> http://packages.debian.org/search?suite=sid&searchon=contents&keywords=libjawt.so
I am wondering if there is a transition ongoing from 'powerpc' to 'ppc' or vice versa ? These packages are using 'ppc' /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/jre/lib/ppc/libjawt.so openjdk-6-dbg /usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/java-1.5.0-gcj-4.5/jre/lib/ppc/libjawt.so gcc-snapshot /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.5.0-gcj-4.4/jre/lib/ppc/libjawt.so gcj-4.4-jre-headless /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/jre/lib/ppc/libjawt.so openjdk-6-jre-headless These packages are using 'powerpc' /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.5.0-gcj-4.3-1.5.0.0/jre/lib/powerpc/libjawt.so java-gcj-compat-headless /usr/lib/kaffe/jthreads/jre/lib/powerpc/libjawt.so kaffe-jthreads /usr/lib/kaffe/pthreads/jre/lib/powerpc/libjawt.so kaffe-pthreads The openjdk-6 package is using a redefinition/mapping of the architecture in debian/rules: [...] arch_map := alpha=alpha arm=arm armel=arm amd64=amd64 hppa=parisc i386=i586 lpia=i586 m68k=m68k mips=mips mipsel=mipsel powerpc=ppc sparc=sparc s390=s390 ia64=ia64 [...] Where can I read more about the reason for that? In what case do I have to use 'ppc' instead of 'powerpc'? Thanks Dominique -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
