Re: Debianized Eclipse 2.1M5

2003-02-11 Thread Thomas J. Zeeman
On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, Caoilte O'Connor wrote: > On Tuesday 11 February 2003 10:17 am, Takashi Okamoto wrote: > > I rebuild on Eclipse with sid. But 2.1M5 didn't work with libmotif3. I > > changed to gtk binding and uploaded new packages. > > > > New packages should work and build with sid. Howeve

Re: log4j version

2003-02-11 Thread Ola Lundqvist
Hi I think both Tony and I can sponsor you. Regards, // Ola On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 07:53:59AM -0500, Jesse Stockall wrote: > On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 08:47:25AM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote: > > You are very welcome to take it over. > > > > But before you do, you should contact Jesse Stockall <[

Re: JNI Installation Directories: Another push

2003-02-11 Thread Ola Lundqvist
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 01:59:25AM -0800, Stephen Zander wrote: > > "Ola" == Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Ola> You actually say that they allow jdk1.1 to be in the archives > Ola> but not updates to it? > > Yep. Impressive, huh! Well. Do they have any reason for this?

Re: Debianized Eclipse 2.1M5

2003-02-11 Thread Thomas J. Zeeman
On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, Caoilte O'Connor wrote: > On Tuesday 11 February 2003 10:17 am, Takashi Okamoto wrote: > > I rebuild on Eclipse with sid. But 2.1M5 didn't work with libmotif3. I > > changed to gtk binding and uploaded new packages. > > > > New packages should work and build with sid. Howeve

Re: log4j version

2003-02-11 Thread Ola Lundqvist
Hi I think both Tony and I can sponsor you. Regards, // Ola On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 07:53:59AM -0500, Jesse Stockall wrote: > On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 08:47:25AM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote: > > You are very welcome to take it over. > > > > But before you do, you should contact Jesse Stockall <[

Re: JNI Installation Directories: Another push

2003-02-11 Thread Ola Lundqvist
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 01:59:25AM -0800, Stephen Zander wrote: > > "Ola" == Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Ola> You actually say that they allow jdk1.1 to be in the archives > Ola> but not updates to it? > > Yep. Impressive, huh! Well. Do they have any reason for this?

Re: Debianized Eclipse 2.1M5

2003-02-11 Thread Caoilte O'Connor
On Tuesday 11 February 2003 10:17 am, Takashi Okamoto wrote: > From: Roberto Franchini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Debianized Eclipse 2.1M5 > Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 15:18:47 +0100 > > > I can't install libmotif, since libmotif doesn't exists. On my > > workstation I've got libmotif3 an lesst

Re: log4j version

2003-02-11 Thread Grzegorz B. Prokopski
W liście z wto, 11-02-2003, godz. 10:58, Ola Lundqvist pisze: > Hi > > On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 09:57:53AM +0200, Kalle Kivimaa wrote: > > Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > The package should also be renamed to liblog4-java. But there are a couple > > > > Shouldn't it be liblog4j-ja

Re: log4j version

2003-02-11 Thread Jesse Stockall
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 10:58:51AM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote: > > > > Shouldn't it be liblog4j-java as log4j is the name of the library? > > Well the software is pronounced log for java. It could be named > liblog4j-java too but I can not see why the extra j should be there. > If the package is

Re: Debianized Eclipse 2.1M5

2003-02-11 Thread Thomas J. Zeeman
On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, Takashi Okamoto wrote: > From: Roberto Franchini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Debianized Eclipse 2.1M5 > Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 15:18:47 +0100 > > I can't install libmotif, since libmotif doesn't exists. On my workstation > > I've got libmotif3 an lesstif2. > > I rebui

Re: log4j version

2003-02-11 Thread Jesse Stockall
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 08:47:25AM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote: > You are very welcome to take it over. > > But before you do, you should contact Jesse Stockall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > that is (according to some of my logs) preparing new packages. Obviously > this seems to have stalled. I had new p

Re: Debianized Eclipse 2.1M5

2003-02-11 Thread Caoilte O'Connor
On Tuesday 11 February 2003 10:17 am, Takashi Okamoto wrote: > From: Roberto Franchini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Debianized Eclipse 2.1M5 > Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 15:18:47 +0100 > > > I can't install libmotif, since libmotif doesn't exists. On my > > workstation I've got libmotif3 an lesst

Re: log4j version

2003-02-11 Thread Grzegorz B. Prokopski
W liście z wto, 11-02-2003, godz. 10:58, Ola Lundqvist pisze: > Hi > > On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 09:57:53AM +0200, Kalle Kivimaa wrote: > > Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > The package should also be renamed to liblog4-java. But there are a couple > > > > Shouldn't it be liblog4j-ja

Re: Debianized Eclipse 2.1M5

2003-02-11 Thread Roberto Franchini
On Tuesday 11 February 2003 11:17, Takashi Okamoto wrote: > From: Roberto Franchini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Debianized Eclipse 2.1M5 > Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 15:18:47 +0100 > > > I can't install libmotif, since libmotif doesn't exists. On my > > workstation I've got libmotif3 an lesstif2

Re: log4j version

2003-02-11 Thread Jesse Stockall
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 10:58:51AM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote: > > > > Shouldn't it be liblog4j-java as log4j is the name of the library? > > Well the software is pronounced log for java. It could be named > liblog4j-java too but I can not see why the extra j should be there. > If the package is

Re: Debianized Eclipse 2.1M5

2003-02-11 Thread Thomas J. Zeeman
On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, Takashi Okamoto wrote: > From: Roberto Franchini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Debianized Eclipse 2.1M5 > Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 15:18:47 +0100 > > I can't install libmotif, since libmotif doesn't exists. On my workstation > > I've got libmotif3 an lesstif2. > > I rebui

Re: log4j version

2003-02-11 Thread Jesse Stockall
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 08:47:25AM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote: > You are very welcome to take it over. > > But before you do, you should contact Jesse Stockall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > that is (according to some of my logs) preparing new packages. Obviously > this seems to have stalled. I had new p

Re: Debianized Eclipse 2.1M5

2003-02-11 Thread Takashi Okamoto
From: Roberto Franchini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Debianized Eclipse 2.1M5 Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 15:18:47 +0100 > I can't install libmotif, since libmotif doesn't exists. On my workstation > I've got libmotif3 an lesstif2. I rebuild on Eclipse with sid. But 2.1M5 didn't work with libmoti

Re: JNI Installation Directories: Another push

2003-02-11 Thread Stephen Zander
> "Ola" == Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Ola> You actually say that they allow jdk1.1 to be in the archives Ola> but not updates to it? Yep. Impressive, huh! -- Stephen "A duck!"

Re: log4j version

2003-02-11 Thread Ola Lundqvist
Hi On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 09:57:53AM +0200, Kalle Kivimaa wrote: > Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > The package should also be renamed to liblog4-java. But there are a couple > > Shouldn't it be liblog4j-java as log4j is the name of the library? Well the software is pronounced log

Re: Debianized Eclipse 2.1M5

2003-02-11 Thread Roberto Franchini
On Tuesday 11 February 2003 11:17, Takashi Okamoto wrote: > From: Roberto Franchini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Debianized Eclipse 2.1M5 > Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 15:18:47 +0100 > > > I can't install libmotif, since libmotif doesn't exists. On my > > workstation I've got libmotif3 an lesstif2

Re: Debianized Eclipse 2.1M5

2003-02-11 Thread Takashi Okamoto
From: Roberto Franchini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Debianized Eclipse 2.1M5 Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 15:18:47 +0100 > I can't install libmotif, since libmotif doesn't exists. On my workstation > I've got libmotif3 an lesstif2. I rebuild on Eclipse with sid. But 2.1M5 didn't work with libmoti

Re: log4j version

2003-02-11 Thread Kalle Kivimaa
Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The package should also be renamed to liblog4-java. But there are a couple Shouldn't it be liblog4j-java as log4j is the name of the library? -- * Sufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology (T.P) * * PGP public key avai

Re: JNI Installation Directories: Another push

2003-02-11 Thread Stephen Zander
> "Ola" == Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Ola> You actually say that they allow jdk1.1 to be in the archives Ola> but not updates to it? Yep. Impressive, huh! -- Stephen "A duck!" -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?

Re: log4j version

2003-02-11 Thread Ola Lundqvist
Hi On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 09:57:53AM +0200, Kalle Kivimaa wrote: > Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > The package should also be renamed to liblog4-java. But there are a couple > > Shouldn't it be liblog4j-java as log4j is the name of the library? Well the software is pronounced log

Re: log4j version

2003-02-11 Thread Ola Lundqvist
Hello On Mon, Feb 10, 2003 at 05:56:10PM -0500, Tony Simone wrote: > Hi all. I've been working on OpenNMS packages for Debian, and have been > supplying them from the opennms.org site for now. I recently ran into a > build problem with the latest OpenNMS version that has prompted this > message.

Re: log4j version

2003-02-11 Thread Kalle Kivimaa
Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The package should also be renamed to liblog4-java. But there are a couple Shouldn't it be liblog4j-java as log4j is the name of the library? -- * Sufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology (T.P) * * PGP public key avai

Re: log4j version

2003-02-11 Thread Ola Lundqvist
Hello On Mon, Feb 10, 2003 at 05:56:10PM -0500, Tony Simone wrote: > Hi all. I've been working on OpenNMS packages for Debian, and have been > supplying them from the opennms.org site for now. I recently ran into a > build problem with the latest OpenNMS version that has prompted this > message.