Bill Wohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Just did an upgrade and tomcat now requires java2-runtime which the
> Blackdown package of j2sdk1.3 does not provide. Is someone working
> to upgrade j2sdk1.3 control file so that I don't have to install jdk
> 1.1 to get tomcat to install?
Insta
>I got a message from Henri suggesting that I look at going to
>tomcat 3.3 and then building the
>connectors from jakarta-tomcat-connectors for ajp14.
Warning ajp14 in jtc is a currently under developpement
and don't expect a release before some weeks. For Tomcat 3.3
, you should consider ajp13
> "Andrew" == Andrew Pimlott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andrew> But this is Debian, and we have standards and conventions
Andrew> for our packages, so we should do better. This might
Andrew> cause some difficulty in building packages, and may
Andrew> require educating upstream
Just did an upgrade and tomcat now requires java2-runtime which the
Blackdown package of j2sdk1.3 does not provide. Is someone working
to upgrade j2sdk1.3 control file so that I don't have to install jdk
1.1 to get tomcat to install?
In the meantime, is there any update-alternatives magi
Guillaume Rousse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > ftp://ftp.leanedit.org/debian-java/java-classpath_0.0.1-1_all.deb
> Could you please make this available also non-packaged for us poor non-debian
> users to have a look at ?
FWIW, you can use
ar p data.tar.gz | tar xz
in a suitable directory to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andrew Pimlott) writes:
> On Fri, Nov 23, 2001 at 12:21:57PM +0100, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
> > According to discussion, it seems we agreed on following points:
>
> I didn't realize there was consensus, [...]
Me neither. For the record, I'm also dissenting with Guillaume's
"co
> "Andrew" == Andrew Pimlott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andrew> But this is Debian, and we have standards and conventions
Andrew> for our packages, so we should do better. This might
Andrew> cause some difficulty in building packages, and may
Andrew> require educating upstrea
Just did an upgrade and tomcat now requires java2-runtime which the
Blackdown package of j2sdk1.3 does not provide. Is someone working
to upgrade j2sdk1.3 control file so that I don't have to install jdk
1.1 to get tomcat to install?
In the meantime, is there any update-alternatives mag
Guillaume Rousse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > ftp://ftp.leanedit.org/debian-java/java-classpath_0.0.1-1_all.deb
> Could you please make this available also non-packaged for us poor non-debian
> users to have a look at ?
FWIW, you can use
ar p data.tar.gz | tar xz
in a suitable directory t
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andrew Pimlott) writes:
> On Fri, Nov 23, 2001 at 12:21:57PM +0100, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
> > According to discussion, it seems we agreed on following points:
>
> I didn't realize there was consensus, [...]
Me neither. For the record, I'm also dissenting with Guillaume's
"c
I got a message from Henri suggesting that I look at going to tomcat 3.3 and
then building the
connectors from jakarta-tomcat-connectors for ajp14.
I downloaded, I believe, all the files that I need but things will not compile.
The tomcat 3.3 seems to build ok.
I then went to the jakarta-tomcat-
Ainsi parlait GOMEZ Henri :
> >- should we contact FHS about this new directory (/usr/share/javadoc) ?
>
> Yes
Even if we switch to using standard /usr/share/doc instead, maybe we could
summarise relevant part of our policies to FHS anyway (usr/share/java, for
instance). Unless some Debian folks
I got a message from Henri suggesting that I look at going to tomcat 3.3 and then
building the
connectors from jakarta-tomcat-connectors for ajp14.
I downloaded, I believe, all the files that I need but things will not compile.
The tomcat 3.3 seems to build ok.
I then went to the jakarta-tomcat
Ainsi parlait GOMEZ Henri :
> >- should we contact FHS about this new directory (/usr/share/javadoc) ?
>
> Yes
Even if we switch to using standard /usr/share/doc instead, maybe we could
summarise relevant part of our policies to FHS anyway (usr/share/java, for
instance). Unless some Debian folks
On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 06:39:38PM +0100, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
> Ainsi parlait Andrew Pimlott :
> > What exactly do you mean by "standard documentation"? I assume you
> > mean "non-developer documentation". In this case, you are
> > presenting a false division, because "developer documentation
On Wed, Nov 14, 2001 at 11:23:52PM +0100, Max Kellermann wrote:
> I have made a Debian package containing an experimental java
> classpath builder
Hi Max. I took a quick look at your package. I think the idea is
basically right, but I would be somewhat disappointed if we couldn't
fit the necessa
Ainsi parlait Andrew Pimlott :
> On Fri, Nov 23, 2001 at 12:21:57PM +0100, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
> > According to discussion, it seems we agreed on following points:
>
> I didn't realize there was consensus, though that may be because
> I've been skimming lots of back mail. I don't think this pr
[ Responding to an old message. Sorry. ]
On Fri, Nov 09, 2001 at 12:29:44AM -0800, Kevin A. Burton wrote:
> Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Someone else writes:
> > > Due to the WORA nature of Java applications, a lot of projects assume they
> > > are the only package management system
On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 06:39:38PM +0100, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
> Ainsi parlait Andrew Pimlott :
> > What exactly do you mean by "standard documentation"? I assume you
> > mean "non-developer documentation". In this case, you are
> > presenting a false division, because "developer documentatio
On Wed, Nov 14, 2001 at 11:23:52PM +0100, Max Kellermann wrote:
> I have made a Debian package containing an experimental java
> classpath builder
Hi Max. I took a quick look at your package. I think the idea is
basically right, but I would be somewhat disappointed if we couldn't
fit the necess
Ainsi parlait Andrew Pimlott :
> On Fri, Nov 23, 2001 at 12:21:57PM +0100, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
> > According to discussion, it seems we agreed on following points:
>
> I didn't realize there was consensus, though that may be because
> I've been skimming lots of back mail. I don't think this p
[ Responding to an old message. Sorry. ]
On Fri, Nov 09, 2001 at 12:29:44AM -0800, Kevin A. Burton wrote:
> Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Someone else writes:
> > > Due to the WORA nature of Java applications, a lot of projects assume they
> > > are the only package management syste
* Guillaume Rousse
| Can't posting be restricted to subscribers only ?
This has been discussed a gazillion times already. Posting will not
be restricted to subscribers only.
(And why would you want to do that? It would mean more work on many
people, or we would cooperate worse with other part
* Guillaume Rousse
| Can't posting be restricted to subscribers only ?
This has been discussed a gazillion times already. Posting will not
be restricted to subscribers only.
(And why would you want to do that? It would mean more work on many
people, or we would cooperate worse with other par
24 matches
Mail list logo
