Ainsi parlait GOMEZ Henri : > >- should we contact FHS about this new directory (/usr/share/javadoc) ? > > Yes Even if we switch to using standard /usr/share/doc instead, maybe we could summarise relevant part of our policies to FHS anyway (usr/share/java, for instance). Unless some Debian folks already did it ?
> >- is cross-linking of javadoc an interesting/achievable feature ? > >When building foo package, depending of bar package, add -linkoffline > >/usr/share/javadoc/bar option to javadoc would provide > >cross-linked api > >documentation > > > >Subsidiary question (personal curiosity): > >i know ant documentation comes in ant-doc package on debian. But is it > >installed in /usr/share/doc/ant (using the main package name) or > >/usr/share/doc/ant-doc (using the actual documentation package name) > >directory ? > >On rpm system (at least mandrake), /usr/share/doc/ant contains basic > >readme.txt, license.txt, etc, while real manual get installed in > >/usr/share/doc/ant-manual. > >This is important as we have to decide if ant javadoc will go in > >/usr/share/javadoc/ant or /usr/share/javadoc/ant-javadoc :-) > > +1 for /usr/share/javadoc/ant Then we have a technical problem to solve (sorry to bother Debian people there). As it concerns only rpm, i'll respond on jpackage-devel list only. -- Guillaume Rousse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GPG key http://lis.snv.jussieu.fr/~rousse/gpgkey.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
