Tomcat/potato

2001-10-04 Thread Eduardo Gargiulo
Hi all. I'm new to the list. I'm looking for help to install/configure tomcat on potato. I want to know where to point my apt sources and what packages I need. thanks -- Eduardo Gargiulo GnuPG Fingerprint = 3EF7 1AEE 8C2C F823 C8CC A4FC 4D12 D717 8745 64ED

Re: The proposed java policy have now moved.

2001-10-04 Thread Ola Lundqvist
On Thu, Oct 04, 2001 at 05:27:12PM +0200, Marcus Crafter wrote: > Hi Ola, > > Great work, and thanks for updating the policy. :-) > > Just one question though - I'm curious why programs have to depend on > both java-virtual-machine *and* java1/2-runtime now ? Why is this so ? W

Re: [Fwd: [Issue 15720] - attempts to load dt_shmem and generates RuntimePermission exception]

2001-10-04 Thread Juergen Kreileder
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > wanted to pass this on to the java list, which I listen in on ... > > If you run blackdown current woody jdk with netbeans 3.2.1 on > unstable platform (all latest/greatest as of 9:43 AM EST Oct 4), you > cannot debug because clicking on > debug=>attach throws an excep

Re: The proposed java policy have now moved.

2001-10-04 Thread Marcus Crafter
Hi Ola, Great work, and thanks for updating the policy. :-) Just one question though - I'm curious why programs have to depend on both java-virtual-machine *and* java1/2-runtime now ? Why is this so ? I would have thought depending on java1/2-runtime would implici

Tomcat/potato

2001-10-04 Thread Eduardo Gargiulo
Hi all. I'm new to the list. I'm looking for help to install/configure tomcat on potato. I want to know where to point my apt sources and what packages I need. thanks -- Eduardo Gargiulo GnuPG Fingerprint = 3EF7 1AEE 8C2C F823 C8CC A4FC 4D12 D717 8745 64ED -- To UNS

Re: The proposed java policy have now moved.

2001-10-04 Thread Ola Lundqvist
On Thu, Oct 04, 2001 at 05:27:12PM +0200, Marcus Crafter wrote: > Hi Ola, > > Great work, and thanks for updating the policy. :-) > > Just one question though - I'm curious why programs have to depend on > both java-virtual-machine *and* java1/2-runtime now ? Why is this so ?

[Fwd: [Issue 15720] - attempts to load dt_shmem and generates RuntimePermission exception]

2001-10-04 Thread Heitzso
wanted to pass this on to the java list, which I listen in on ... If you run blackdown current woody jdk with netbeans 3.2.1 on unstable platform (all latest/greatest as of 9:43 AM EST Oct 4), you cannot debug because clicking on debug=>attach throws an exception re RuntimePermission related to acc

Re: [Fwd: [Issue 15720] - attempts to load dt_shmem and generates RuntimePermission exception]

2001-10-04 Thread Juergen Kreileder
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > wanted to pass this on to the java list, which I listen in on ... > > If you run blackdown current woody jdk with netbeans 3.2.1 on > unstable platform (all latest/greatest as of 9:43 AM EST Oct 4), you > cannot debug because clicking on > debug=>attach throws an exce

Re: The proposed java policy have now moved.

2001-10-04 Thread Marcus Crafter
Hi Ola, Great work, and thanks for updating the policy. :-) Just one question though - I'm curious why programs have to depend on both java-virtual-machine *and* java1/2-runtime now ? Why is this so ? I would have thought depending on java1/2-runtime would implic

[Fwd: [Issue 15720] - attempts to load dt_shmem and generates RuntimePermission exception]

2001-10-04 Thread Heitzso
wanted to pass this on to the java list, which I listen in on ... If you run blackdown current woody jdk with netbeans 3.2.1 on unstable platform (all latest/greatest as of 9:43 AM EST Oct 4), you cannot debug because clicking on debug=>attach throws an exception re RuntimePermission related to a

Re: Bug#114214: The proposed java policy have now moved.

2001-10-04 Thread Josip Rodin
On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 05:36:58PM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote: > As the new maintainer I have now finally had the time to > change the policy acording to the discussions on the java > mailinglist. > > Because the previous policy was on bortz accound I have to > move it to a new location > http://p

Re: Bug#114214: The proposed java policy have now moved.

2001-10-04 Thread Josip Rodin
On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 05:36:58PM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote: > As the new maintainer I have now finally had the time to > change the policy acording to the discussions on the java > mailinglist. > > Because the previous policy was on bortz accound I have to > move it to a new location > http://