Hi Ola,

        Great work, and thanks for updating the policy. :-)

        Just one question though - I'm curious why programs have to depend on
        both java-virtual-machine *and* java1/2-runtime now ? Why is this so ?

        I would have thought depending on java1/2-runtime would implicitly
        mean that the software requires a java-virtual-machine ?

        Now that we have java1/2-runtime, what does java-virtual-machine
        actually mean now ? (do we even need it anymore ?) does it mean 'any'
        jvm ? (in which case depending on it and java1/2 would be slightly
        contradictory wouldn't it ?)

        Or have I missed the point entirely ? :-)

        Cheers,

        Marcus

On Tue, 2 Oct 2001, Ola Lundqvist wrote:

> Package: www.debian.org
> 
> Hi
> 
> As the new maintainer I have now finally had the time to
> change the policy acording to the discussions on the java
> mailinglist.
> 
> Because the previous policy was on bortz accound I have to
> move it to a new location
> http://people.debian.org/~opal/java/policy.html
> 
> So the link from www.debian.org/devel should be changed acordingly.
> 
> Hints on how to make this page (automaticly, no manual changes each
> time please) look like the other official pages
> are appriciated. Bortz used docbook but I can not find out how
> he created the web version. So now I have the same html version
> as the one in java-common.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> // Ola
> 
> PS: Folks on debian-java are welcome to read it though and make
> comments. :)
> DS.
> 
> 

-- 
        .....
     ,,$$$$$$$$$,      Marcus Crafter
    ;$'      '$$$$:    Computer Systems Engineer
    $:         $$$$:   Open Software Associates GmbH
     $       o_)$$$:   82-84 Mainzer Landstrasse
     ;$,    _/\ &&:'   60327 Frankfurt Germany
       '     /( &&&
           \_&&&&'     Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
          &&&&.        Business Hours : +49 69 9757 200
    &&&&&&&:


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to